临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
近视眼像差与人眼客观焦深的关联性分析
张明栋
王雁
赵新恒
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20221123-00545
Correlation analysis of myopia aberration and objective depth of focus in the human eye
Zhang Mingdong
Wang Yan
Zhao Xinheng
Authors Info & Affiliations
Zhang Mingdong
Clinical School of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Eye Institute, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nankai University, Institute of Ophthalmology, Nankai University, Tianjin 300020, China
Wang Yan
Clinical School of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Eye Institute, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nankai University, Institute of Ophthalmology, Nankai University, Tianjin 300020, China
Zhao Xinheng
Clinical School of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Eye Institute, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nankai University, Institute of Ophthalmology, Nankai University, Tianjin 300020, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20221123-00545
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨低、高阶像差与人眼客观焦深的关联性及影响客观焦深的因素。

方法采用横断面研究,选取2022年2—4月在天津市眼科医院屈光手术中心就诊的近视及散光患者76例152眼,其中男41例,女35例。采用iTrace视功能分析仪手动选择3、4、5和6 mm 4个扫描直径,对患者的全眼低阶像差和高阶像差进行测量,同时直接测得患者在该瞳孔直径下的客观焦深。采用Spearman秩相关性分析评估不同瞳孔直径下客观焦深与低、高阶像差之间的相关性;对不同程度近视和散光人群及不同瞳孔直径、眼别、性别间的客观焦深进行比较。

结果客观焦深与总低阶像差在3、4、5、6 mm瞳孔直径下均呈正相关( r s =0.380、0.317、0.385、0.519,均 P<0.01)。客观焦深与离焦(近视度)在3、4、5、6 mm瞳孔直径下均呈正相关( r s =0.377、0.323、0.403、0.512,均 P<0.01),与像散(散光度)仅在瞳孔直径为6 mm时呈正相关( r s =0.255, P<0.05)。3、4、5、6 mm瞳孔直径下不同近视程度组客观焦深总体比较差异均有统计学意义( H=6.440、7.370、9.990、16.930,均 P<0.05),其中不同瞳孔直径下高度近视组客观焦深均明显高于低度近视组,6 mm瞳孔直径下高度近视组客观焦深高于中度近视组,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。客观焦深与总高阶像差在3、4、5、6 mm瞳孔直径下均呈正相关( r s =0.911、0.807、0.733、0.677,均 P<0.001)。在各项高阶像差中,客观焦深与总彗差在3、4、5、6 mm瞳孔直径下均呈正相关( r s =0.727、0.557、0.620、0.487,均 P<0.001);与垂直彗差在3、4、5、6 mm瞳孔直径下均呈正相关( r s =0.439、0.405、0.553、0.400,均 P<0.001);与水平彗差在瞳孔直径为5 mm和6 mm时均呈正相关( r s =0.308、0.308,均 P<0.01);与三叶草像差在3、4、5、6 mm瞳孔直径下均呈正相关( r s =0.344、0.443、0.316、0.330,均 P<0.01);与球差在瞳孔直径为4、5和6 mm时均呈正相关( r s =0.321、0.310、0.428,均 P<0.01)。3 mm与4 mm、5 mm与6 mm瞳孔直径下客观焦深比较,差异均有统计学意义( P=0.011、0.004)。不同散光程度之间及不同性别、不同眼别之间客观焦深比较差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。

结论人眼客观焦深大小主要与高阶像差中垂直彗差和三叶草像差以及低阶像差中离焦量具有较强关联性,水平彗差和球差仅在瞳孔直径较大时与客观焦深相关性较强;此外,瞳孔直径较小(3 mm)或较大时(6 mm)明显影响客观焦深。

近视;像差;视觉质量;客观焦深;低阶像差;高阶像差
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation between low-order and high-order aberrations and objective depth of focus in the human eye, and the factors that influence objective depth of focus.

MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed.Seventy-six patients (152 eyes) with myopia and astigmatism patients who were treated at the Refractive Surgery Center of Tianjin Eye Hospital from February to April 2022 were selected, including 41 males and 35 females.The patients' whole-eye low-order and high-order aberrations and objective depth of focus were measured at 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm manually selected pupil diameters using the iTrace visual function analyzer.The correlation between objective depth of focus and low-order and high-order aberrations at different pupil diameters was analyzed by Spearman rank correlation analysis.Objective depth of focus was compared between individuals with different degrees of myopia and astigmatism, individuals with different pupil diameters, right and left eyes, and different sexes.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Eye Hospital (No.2022039).

ResultsObjective depth of focus was positively correlated with total low-order aberrations at 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm pupil diameter ( r s =0.380, 0.317, 0.385, 0.519, all at P<0.01). Objective depth of focus was positively correlated with defocus at 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm pupil diameter ( r s =0.377, 0.323, 0.403, 0.512, all at P<0.01), and with astigmatism at 6 mm pupil diameter ( r s =0.255, P<0.05). There were statistically significant overall differences in objective depth of focus between groups with different degrees of myopia at 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm pupil diameter ( H=6.440, 7.370, 9.990, 16.930; all at P<0.05). Among them, the objective depth of focus of high myopia was significantly higher than that of low myopia at different pupil diameters, and the objective depth of focus of high myopia was higher than that of moderate myopia at 6 mm pupil diameter, with statistically significant differences (all at P<0.05). Objective depth of focus was positively correlated with total high-order aberration at pupil diameters of 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm ( r s =0.911, 0.807, 0.733, 0.677; all at P<0.001). Among various high-order aberrations, objective depth of focus was positively correlated with total coma at 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm pupil diameter ( r s =0.727, 0.557, 0.620, 0.487; all at P<0.001), positively correlated with vertical coma at 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm pupil diameter ( r s =0.439, 0.405, 0.553, 0.400; all at P<0.001), positively correlated with horizontal coma at 5 and 6 mm pupil diameter ( r s =0.308, 0.308; both at P<0.01), positively correlated with trefoil aberration at 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm pupil diameter ( r s =0.344, 0.443, 0.316, 0.330; all at P<0.01), positively correlated with spherical aberration at 4, 5, and 6 mm pupil diameter ( r s =0.321, 0.310, 0.428; all at P<0.01). There was a significant difference in objective depth of focus between 3 and 4 mm, 5 and 6 mm pupil diameters ( P=0.011, 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference in objective depth of focus between different degrees of astigmatism, between males and females, or between left and right eyes (all at P>0.05).

ConclusionsThe objective depth of focus of the human eye is mainly strongly correlated with vertical coma, trefoil aberration in high-order aberrations, as well as defocus in low-order aberrations.Horizontal coma and spherical aberration are strongly correlated with objective depth of focus only when the pupil diameter is large.In addition, if the pupil diameter is too small (3 mm) or too large (6 mm), it has a significant effect on the objective depth of focus.

Myopia;Aberration;Visual quality;Objective depth of focus;Low-aberration;High-aberration
Wang Yan, Email: mocdef.aabnis.piv3417naygnaw
引用本文

张明栋,王雁,赵新恒. 近视眼像差与人眼客观焦深的关联性分析[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2024,42(04):347-353.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20221123-00545

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
临床上往往通过视力、对比敏感度、点扩散函数、调制传递函数等指标来反映人眼的视觉质量以及成像质量 [ 1 , 2 ]。近年来,各类眼科手术已从复明手术转到屈光手术,眼科医师对视觉质量以及成像质量的评价和研究越来越精细。焦深通常是指不影响视轴上的物体在视网膜上成像清晰度的像面可移动的最大范围 [ 3 , 4 , 5 ],直接影响视觉质量。目前,许多老视手术通过增加焦深来解决 [ 6 ],白内障手术中人工晶状体的设计以及屈光不正框架眼镜镜片的设计也涉及焦深问题 [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]。但以往多通过计算得出人眼的主观焦深,关于人眼客观焦深的详细研究及其影响因素在国内外鲜见报道,且无法直接量化。本研究拟分析低、高阶像差对人眼客观焦深的影响,探讨客观焦深作为人眼视觉质量及成像质量评价指标的可行性,为相关临床工作提供参考依据。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
中华医学会眼科学分会眼视光学组中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼视光专业委员会屈光手术视觉质量评价的专家共识[J]中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 201921(8)∶561-568. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.03.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Chinese Optometric Association,Chinese Ophthalmological Society,Ophthalmology and Optometry Committee,Ophthalmologists Association,Chinese Doctor Association. Experts ' consensus on visual quality evaluation after refractive surgery [J]Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201921(8)∶561-568. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.03.001 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[2]
徐路路王雁吴雅楠近视眼飞秒激光小切口基质透镜取出术后角膜光学质量的客观评估[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201735(2)∶139-145. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2017.02.010 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Xu LL , Wang Y , Wu YN et al. Assessment of corneal optical quality following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201735(2)∶139-145. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2017.02.010 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[3]
Atchison DA , Charman WN , Woods RL . Subjective depth-of-focus of the eye[J]Optom Vis Sci 199774(7)∶511-520. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199707000-00019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Wang B , Ciuffreda KJ . Depth-of-focus of the human eye:theory and clinical implications[J]Surv Ophthalmol 200651(1)∶75-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.11.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
王雁赵堪兴汤欣波前像差与临床视觉矫正[M]北京人民卫生出版社 20116567.
Wang Y Zhao KX Tang X et al. Wavefront aberration and clinical vision correction[M]Beijing People ' s Medical Publishing House 20116567.
[6]
Leray B , Cassagne M , Soler V et al. Relationship between induced spherical aberration and depth of focus after hyperopic LASIK in presbyopic patients[J]Ophthalmology 2015122(2)∶233-243. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.021 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Rampat R , Gatinel D Multifocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in 2020[J/OL]Ophthalmology 2021128(11)∶e164-e185[2023-10-10]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32980397/. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.026 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Kohnen T , Suryakumar R Extended depth-of-focus technology in intraocular lenses[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 202046(2)∶298-304. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000109 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Pilger D , Homburg D , Brockmann T et al. Clinical outcome and higher order aberrations after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens[J]Eur J Ophthalmol 201828(4)∶425-432. DOI: 10.1177/1120672118766809 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Vázquez-Villa A , Delgado-Atencio JA , Vázquez-Montiel S et al. Aspheric lens to increase the depth of focus[J]Opt Lett 201540(12)∶2842-2845. DOI: 10.1364/OL.40.002842 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Legge GE , Mullen KT , Woo GC et al. Tolerance to visual defocus[J]J Opt Soc Am A 19874(5)∶851-863. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.000851 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Jansonius NM , Kooijman AC . The effect of spherical and other aberrations upon the modulation transfer of the defocussed human eye[J]Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 199818(6)∶504-513.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Thibos LN , Hong X , Bradley A et al. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations[J]J Vis 20044(4)∶329-351. DOI: 10.1167/4.4.9 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Iskander DR . Computational aspects of the visual Strehl ratio[J]Optom Vis Sci 200683(1)∶57-59. DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000195563.82891.3b .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Hipsley A , Hall B , Rocha KM . Long-term visual outcomes of laser anterior ciliary excision[J]Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 20181038-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.01.033 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Benard Y , Lopez-Gil N , Legras R Subjective depth of field in presence of 4th-order and 6th-order Zernike spherical aberration using adaptive optics technology[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 201036(12)∶2129-2138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.022 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Fernández J , Rodríguez-Vallejo M , Burguera N et al. Spherical aberration for expanding depth of focus[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 202147(12)∶1587-1595. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000713 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Rocha KM , Soriano ES , Chamon W et al. Spherical aberration and depth of focus in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses:a prospective randomized study[J]Ophthalmology 2007114(11)∶2050-2054. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.024 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Rocha KM , Vabre L , Chateau N et al. Expanding depth of focus by modifying higher-order aberrations induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 200935(11)∶1885-1892. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.059 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Legras R , Benard Y , Lopez-Gil N Effect of coma and spherical aberration on depth-of-focus measured using adaptive optics and computationally blurred images[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 201238(3)∶458-469. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.10.032 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
邸保忠青少年近视眼与AC/A率关系的研究[J]眼视光学杂志 20002(1)∶38-39. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2000.01.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Di BZ . A study on AC/A ratio in juvenile myopes[J]Chin J Optom Ophthalmol 20002(1)∶38-39. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2000.01.011 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[22]
Wang Y , Zhao K , Jin Y et al. Changes of higher order aberration with various pupil sizes in the myopic eye[J]J Refract Surg 200319(2)∶Suppl-S270. 274DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20030302-21 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
王雁,Email: mocdef.aabnis.piv3417naygnaw
B

张明栋:参与选题、酝酿和设计试验、实施研究、采集数据、分析/解释数据、起草文章;王雁:参与选题、解释数据、对文章知识性内容的审阅和智力性内容的修改及定稿;赵新恒:参与选题、酝酿和设计试验、分析/解释数据、起草文章

C
所有作者均声明不存在任何利益冲突
D
国家重点研发计划 (2022YFC2404502)
国家自然科学基金面上项目 (82271118)
天津市科技计划 (21JCZDJC01190)
天津市卫生健康科技项目 (TJWJ2022XK036)
天津市医学重点学科(专科)建设项目 (TJYXZDXK-016A)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号