专家述评
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
关注内引流与外引流微创青光眼手术的合理选用
杨宏方
卢文涵
孙兴怀
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20231225-00218
Rational selection between internal and external drainage approaches for microinvasive/minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in intraocular pressure control
Yang Hongfang
Lu Wenhan
Sun Xinghuai
Authors Info & Affiliations
Yang Hongfang
Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, National Research & Training Center of Microinvasive/Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery, Shanghai 200031, China
Lu Wenhan
Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, National Research & Training Center of Microinvasive/Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery, Shanghai 200031, China
Sun Xinghuai
Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, National Research & Training Center of Microinvasive/Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery, Shanghai 200031, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20231225-00218
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

青光眼是不可逆性致盲眼病的首要原因,原发性开角型青光眼是其中的主要类型,其致病机制复杂,但降眼压仍是目前公认的最有效治疗手段。主流的抗青光眼手术是通过增加房水引流达到降低眼压的效果。近二十年来,微创/微小切口抗青光眼手术(MIGS)逐渐成为青光眼手术的热点,国内也逐步开展相关术式,但临床效果并非完全理想。建议眼科医师应在充分理解房水流出路径的解剖、病理生理学特点和各种MIGS手术方式设计原理的基础上,了解各术式的优势和局限性,合理选择内引流和外引流MIGS,规范化开展微创青光眼手术。期待未来能利用无创的多模式影像学手段协助术前评估术眼的结构和功能,为患者个体化选择和规划治疗方式,实现青光眼的精准治疗。

青光眼;微创/微小切口抗青光眼手术;房水流出路径;内引流术;外引流术
ABSTRACT

Glaucoma stands as the leading cause of irreversible blindness, with primary open-angle glaucoma being the predominant type.Although its pathogenic mechanisms are intricate, lowering intraocular pressure remains the most effective treatment.Mainstream glaucoma surgeries aim to lower intraocular pressure by increasing aqueous humor outflow.Over the past two decades, microinvasive/minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has emerged as a hotspot in this field, focusing on minimizing incisions.Domestic practices have followed closely, but clinical outcomes have not been ideal.Based on a comprehensive understanding of the anatomy and pathophysiology of the aqueous outflow pathway and the design principles of various MIGS procedures, ophthalmologists should recognize the advantages and limitations of each technique.It is important to rationally choose between internal and external drainage MIGS and standardize their implementation.In the future, the use of non-invasive multimodal imaging techniques for preoperative assessment of the structural and functional aspects of the eye is expected to facilitate personalized selection and planning for precise treatment.

Glaucoma;Microinvasive/minimally invasive glaucoma surgery;Aqueous humor outflow;Internal drainage procedures;External drainage procedures
Sun Xinghuai, Email: nc.defudabe.umhsnushx
引用本文

杨宏方,卢文涵,孙兴怀. 关注内引流与外引流微创青光眼手术的合理选用[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2024,42(06):497-502.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20231225-00218

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
青光眼是全球重要的公共卫生问题,是导致不可逆盲的重要病因,原发性开角型青光眼(primary open-angle glaucoma,POAG)是其中的一大主要类型。目前研究认为,与原发性闭角型青光眼可以早期预防、阻止疾病发生和发展的特点不同,POAG只能通过治疗来控制疾病进展。据估计,全世界约7 600万人患有青光眼,其中5 750万人受到POAG的影响 [ 1 ]。尽管POAG的致病机制复杂、学说众多,目前公认最直接有效的治疗方法仍然是通过药物、激光或手术降低眼压,其中20%~50%的青光眼患者在其一生中需要进行手术治疗 [ 2 ]。抗青光眼手术实质上即为降眼压手术,原则上青光眼眼压升高的病理机制主要为房水外流受阻,因而针对该病理环节的手术主要是增加房水引流。众多手术方式中,我们所熟知的小梁切除术和传统青光眼引流装置植入术是增加房水引流术式的经典代表,其中小梁切除术是各国青光眼指南所推荐的"金标准"术式,应用最为广泛。近二十年来,多种新的抗青光眼术式不断涌现,创口越来越微小,我们统称为微创/微小切口抗青光眼手术(microinvasive/minimally invasive glaucoma surgery,MIGS) [ 3 ]。MIGS已成为目前抗青光眼手术的热点和一大趋势。国内也在逐步开展这类手术,但临床效果并不如意。究其原因,存在着部分术者对相关术式认识较片面,甚至对其手术设计原理未深入理解,就开始在临床上实施相关手术,以求新求快的问题。目前已有众多不同类型的MIGS手术在国内开展,还有不少新的术式在不断研发问世,合理选择相应术式为青光眼患者进行手术治疗的关键在于,清楚理解房水流出路径的解剖和病理生理基础,以及各类手术方式的设计原理,以利于规范化开展MIGS,并获得最佳手术效果;同时,也激发我们思考,如何改进和研发适合我国国情、具有我国自主知识产权的新型青光眼术式。青光眼新术式的出现都是基于青光眼眼压升高的基础研究发现,因此,了解并理解相关的研究进展对临床上MIGS的正确合理应用很有必要。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Allison K Patel D Alabi O . Epidemiology of glaucoma:the past,present,and predictions for the future[J/OL]. Cureus 202012(11)∶e11686[2023-11-06]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769798/. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11686 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Tham YC Li X Wong TY et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ophthalmology 2014121(11)∶20812090. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Ahmed . MIGS and the FDA:what's in a name?[J]. Ophthalmology 2015122(9)∶17371739. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.022 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Mäepea O Bill A Pressures in the juxtacanalicular tissue and Schlemm's canal in monkeys[J]. Exp Eye Res 199254(6)∶879883. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4835(92)90151-h .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Andrew NH Akkach S Casson RJ . A review of aqueous outflow resistance and its relevance to microinvasive glaucoma surgery[J]. Surv Ophthalmol 202065(1)∶1831. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.08.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Schacknow PN Samples JR . The glaucoma book[M]. New YorkSpringer 20106578.
[7]
Vahabikashi A Gelman A Dong B et al. Increased stiffness and flow resistance of the inner wall of Schlemm's canal in glaucomatous human eyes[J/OL]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019116(52)∶2655526563[2023-11-06]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31806762/. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1911837116 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Carreon T van der Merwe E Fellman RL et al. Aqueous outflow-a continuum from trabecular meshwork to episcleral veins[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res 201757108133. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.12.004 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
孙兴怀王艳孟樊荣原发性开角型青光眼非穿透小梁手术患者深层巩膜瓣及小梁膜的病理学观察[J]. 中华眼科杂志 200339(8)∶462465. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2003.08.107 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Sun XH Wang Y Meng FR . Pathological study on the deep scleral flap and external trabecular membrane obtained from non-penetrating trabecular surgery[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol 200339(8)∶462465. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2003.08.107 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[10]
Rosenquist R Epstein D Melamed S et al. Outflow resistance of enucleated human eyes at two different perfusion pressures and different extents of trabeculotomy[J]. Curr Eye Res 19898(12)∶12331240. DOI: 10.3109/02713688909013902 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Gonzalez JM Jr Ko MK Hong YK et al. Deep tissue analysis of distal aqueous drainage structures and contractile features[J/OL]. Sci Rep 20177(1)∶17071[2023-11-06]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5719038/. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16897-y .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Xin C Wang RK Song S et al. Aqueous outflow regulation:optical coherence tomography implicates pressure-dependent tissue motion[J]. Exp Eye Res 2017158171186. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.06.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Johnstone M Xin C Tan J et al. Aqueous outflow regulation-21st century concepts[J/OL]. Prog Retin Eye Res 202183100917[2023-11-08]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8126645/. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100917 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Johnstone M Xin C Martin E et al. Trabecular meshwork movement controls distal valves and chambers:new glaucoma medical and surgical targets[J/OL]. J Clin Med 202312(20)∶6599[2023-11-08]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607137/. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206599 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Johnstone MA . The aqueous outflow system as a mechanical pump:evidence from examination of tissue and aqueous movement in human and non-human primates[J]. J Glaucoma 200413(5)∶421438. DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000131757.63542.24 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Kaufmann C Bachmann LM Robert YC et al. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry[J]. Arch Ophthalmol 2006124(8)∶11041108. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.124.8.1104 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Battista SA Lu Z Hofmann S et al. Reduction of the available area for aqueous humor outflow and increase in meshwork herniations into collector channels following acute IOP elevation in bovine eyes[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 200849(12)∶53465352. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-1707 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Lewczuk K Jabłońska J Konopińska J et al. Schlemm's canal:the outflow 'vessel'[J/OL]. Acta Ophthalmol 2022100(4)∶e881e890[2023-11-10]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293138/. DOI: 10.1111/aos.15027 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Du R Xin C Xu J et al. Pulsatile trabecular meshwork motion:an indicator of intraocular pressure control in primary open-angle glaucoma[J/OL]. J Clin Med 202211(10)∶2696[2023-11-20]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9142929/. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102696 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Johnson M What controls aqueous humour outflow resistance?[J]. Exp Eye Res 200682(4)∶545557. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.10.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
M Elhusseiny A Jamerson EC Menshawey R et al. Collector channels:role and evaluation in Schlemm's canal surgery[J]. Curr Eye Res 202045(10)∶11811187. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1773866 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Li P Butt A Chien JL et al. Characteristics and variations of in vivo Schlemm's canal and collector channel microstructures in enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography [J]. Br J Ophthalmol 2017101(6)∶808813. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309295 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Lee JY Akiyama G Saraswathy S et al. Aqueous humour outflow imaging:seeing is believing[J]. Eye (Lond) 202135(1)∶202215. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-01215-0 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Waxman S Loewen RT Dang Y et al. High-resolution,three-dimensional reconstruction of the outflow tract demonstrates segmental differences in cleared eyes[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201859(6)∶23712380. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-23075 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
Johnson M McLaren JW Overby DR . Unconventional aqueous humor outflow:a review[J]. Exp Eye Res 201715894111. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.01.017 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[26]
Suguro K Toris CB Pederson JE . Uveoscleral outflow following cyclodialysis in the monkey eye using a fluorescent tracer[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 198526(6)∶810813.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[27]
Fellman RL Mattox C Singh K et al. American glaucoma society position paper:microinvasive glaucoma surgery[J]. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 20203(1)∶16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.12.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[28]
中华医学会眼科学分会青光眼学组中国微创青光眼手术适应证选择专家共识(2023)[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志 202341(6)∶521526. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20230311-00083 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Glaucoma Group of Ophthalmology Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese consensus on the selection of indications for minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (2023)[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 202341(6)∶521526. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20230311-00083 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[29]
Balas M Mathew DJ . Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery:a review of the literature[J/OL]. Vision (Basel) 20237(3)∶54[2023-11-12]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443347/. DOI: 10.3390/vision7030054 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[30]
Jabłońska J Lewczuk K Konopińska J et al. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery:a review and classification of implant-dependent procedures and techniques[J/OL]. Acta Ophthalmol 2022100(2)∶e327e338[2023-11-20]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291507/. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14906 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[31]
Pereira I van de Wijdeven R Wyss HM et al. Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices:a comprehensive review of current options and future directions[J]. Eye (Lond) 202135(12)∶32023221. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01595-x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[32]
Ang B Lim SY Betzler BK et al. Recent advancements in glaucoma surgery-a review[J/OL]. Bioengineering (Basel) 202310(9)∶1096[2023-11-20]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10525614/. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10091096 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[33]
Shah M Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery-an interventional glaucoma revolution[J/OL]. Eye Vis (Lond) 2019629[2023-11-22]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766174/. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-019-0154-1 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[34]
Faria BM Costa VP Melillo G et al. Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy for glaucoma:1-year outcomes and success predictors[J]. J Glaucoma 202231(6)∶443448. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002025 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[35]
Tabet R Stewart WC Feldman R et al. A review of additivity to prostaglandin analogs:fixed and unfixed combinations[J]. Surv Ophthalmol 200853Suppl1S8592. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.08.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[36]
Reiss G Clifford B Vold S et al. Safety and effectiveness of cypass supraciliary micro-stent in primary open-angle glaucoma:5-year results from the COMPASS XT Study[J]. Am J Ophthalmol 2019208219225. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.015 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[37]
Yu DY Morgan WH Sun X et al. The critical role of the conjunctiva in glaucoma filtration surgery[J]. Prog Retin Eye Res 200928(5)∶303328. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.06.004 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[38]
Huang AS Li M Yang D et al. Aqueous angiography in living nonhuman primates shows segmental,pulsatile,and dynamic angiographic aqueous humor outflow[J]. Ophthalmology 2017124(6)∶793803. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.030 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[39]
Narayanaswamy A Thakur S Nongpiur ME et al. Aqueous outflow channels and its lymphatic association:a review[J]. Surv Ophthalmol 202267(3)∶659674. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.10.004 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[40]
Huang AS Francis BA Weinreb RN . Structural and functional imaging of aqueous humour outflow:a review[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 201846(2)∶158168. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13064 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[41]
Wu Y Seong YJ Li K et al. Organogenesis and distribution of the ocular lymphatic vessels in the anterior eye[J/OL]. JCI Insight 20205(13)∶e135121[2023-11-23]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406257/. DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.135121 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[42]
Akiyama G Saraswathy S Bogarin T et al. Functional,structural,and molecular identification of lymphatic outflow from subconjunctival blebs[J/OL]. Exp Eye Res 2020196108049[2023-11-23]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328765/. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108049 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[43]
Batlle JF Corona A Albuquerque R Long-term results of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma from a single-center nonrandomized study[J]. J Glaucoma 202130(3)∶281286. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001734 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[44]
Samuelson TW Sarkisian SR Jr Lubeck DM et al. Prospective,randomized,controlled pivotal trial of an ab interno implanted trabecular Micro-Bypass in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract:two-year results[J]. Ophthalmology 2019126(6)∶811821. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.006 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[45]
Ahmed I Fea A Au L et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing hydrus and iStent microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants for standalone treatment of open-angle glaucoma:the COMPARE Study[J]. Ophthalmology 2020127(1)∶5261. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.034 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[46]
Skaat A Sagiv O Kinori M et al. Gold micro-shunt implants versus ahmed glaucoma valve:long-term outcomes of a prospective randomized clinical trial[J]. J Glaucoma 201625(2)∶155161. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000175 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[47]
Fili S Janoud L Vastardis I et al. The STARflo™ glaucoma implant:a single-centre experience at 24 months[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019257(12)∶26992706. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04461-5 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[48]
Denis P Hirneiß C Reddy KP et al. A first-in-human study of the efficacy and safety of MINIject in patients with medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (STAR-Ⅰ)[J]. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 20192(5)∶290297. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.06.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[49]
Yang SA Ciociola EC Mitchell W et al. Effectiveness of microinvasive glaucoma surgery in the United States:intelligent research in sight registry analysis 2013-2019[J]. Ophthalmology 2023130(3)∶242255. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.10.021 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[50]
Gallardo MJ Supnet RA Ahmed I Circumferential viscodilation of Schlemm's canal for open-angle glaucoma:ab-interno vs ab-externo canaloplasty with tensioning suture[J]. Clin Ophthalmol 20181224932498. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S178962 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
孙兴怀,Email: nc.defudabe.umhsnushx
B
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
C
上海申康医院发展中心研究计划 (SHDC2020CR6029)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号