综述
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
微创青光眼手术研究进展
王琳艳
叶娟 [综述]
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20210622-00366
Systemic research update of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery
Wang Linyan
Ye Juan
Authors Info & Affiliations
Wang Linyan
Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
Ye Juan
Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20210622-00366
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

青光眼是全球主要的不可逆性致盲眼病,传统的青光眼手术存在损伤结膜和巩膜组织,影响二次手术等缺点。近年来,有诸多关于微创青光眼手术(MIGS)的研究探索,旨在降低眼压、减少患者药物负担的同时,尽量减少对眼部的创伤。从解剖上考虑,房水经小梁网流出的阻力同时来自于近端(小梁网、Schlemm管内壁)和远端(Schlemm管外壁、集液管、房水静脉、巩膜内静脉丛),因此可以把小梁网相关的MIGS手术根据作用位点的不同,分为解除近端阻力(增加小梁网旁路、扩张Schlemm管及小梁网切开)和同时解除远端、近端阻力的手术(Xen Gel Stent和PRESERFLO Microshunt)。此外,还有一些MIGS术式通过增加经脉络膜上腔途径引流或破坏睫状体减少房水生成,达到降低眼压的目的。增加脉络膜上腔引流的术式具有不依赖于眼压高低的优势,代表术式有Cypass Micro-Stent、iStent Supra和iSTAR MINIject。微创的睫状体破坏手术则包括超声睫状体成形术、微脉冲睫状体光凝术、内镜下睫状体光凝术等。MIGS虽然具有创伤更小、可有效控制眼压的优势,但其远期有效性及安全性仍有待严密观察。由于各种新型MIGS术式种类繁多,且大多仍处于临床试验阶段,尚未进入我国市场,因此对国内眼科医生来说相对陌生。本文就目前主流的MIGS术式原理及术后效果进行综述。

青光眼;微创青光眼手术;眼压
ABSTRACT

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide.Conventional glaucoma surgeries have disadvantages like injuring the tissue of conjunctiva and sclera.Recently, there have been many new treatments called minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) sprung up, which aims to lower intraocular pressure and reduce the use of glaucoma medications with less ocular injury.The resistance of aqueous outflow comes from both proximal and distal anatomically.The proximal resistance comes from trabecular meshwork and the inner wall of Schlemm canal (SC), while the distal resistance is decided by the outer wall of SC, aqueous vein, collector canals, episcleral veins and intrascleral venous plexus.Therefore, we could classify the MIGS by anatomical site and the mechanism to control intraocular pressure into different types.First, the MIGS acts on trabecular meshwork, which could be separated into removing proximal resistance including increasing trabecular meshwork bypass, expanding SC, cutting through trabecular meshwork and removing both proximal and distal resistance including Xen Gel Stent and PRESERFLO Microshunt.Second, MIGS procedures reduce intraocular pressure by increasing suprachoroidal drainage or by disrupting the ciliary body to reduce aqueous humor production.The MIGS expanding suprachoroidal drainage is independent of intraocular pressure level, like Cypass Micro-Stent, iStent Supra and iSTAR MINIject.The MIGS destroying ciliary body to reduce humor production include ultrasound cycloplasty, micropulse cyclophotocoagulation, and endocyclophotocoagulation.Despite MIGS can control intraocular pressure effectively in a less invasive way, close follow-ups are still necessary to see its long-term effectiveness and safety.However, the emerging implants are quite confusing to many ophthalmologists.It is especially true for Chinese surgeons as most MIGS are still under clinical trial and have not entered Chinese market.Therefore, this article summarizes the current mainstream MIGS and discussed the design and surgical outcomes of these surgeries.

Glaucoma;Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery;Intraocular pressure
Ye Juan, Email: nc.defudabe.ujznaujey
引用本文

王琳艳,叶娟. 微创青光眼手术研究进展[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2024,42(06):576-583.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20210622-00366

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
青光眼是一种以视野缺损及特征性视神经损害为特征的不可逆性致盲眼病,据估计,到2040年,全球将有超过1.1亿青光眼患者 [ 1 ]。青光眼的治疗主要通过药物、激光或手术降低眼压,从而控制疾病进展。青光眼手术方式繁多,传统的青光眼手术,如小梁切除术、Ex-Press引流器植入术及引流阀植入术(如Ahmed、Baerveldt)等 [ 2 , 3 ],在有效控制眼压的同时,还较易发生低眼压、滤过泡感染、滤过泡瘢痕化等术中及术后并发症。因此,微创青光眼手术(minimally invasive glaucoma surgery,MIGS)应运而生 [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]。美国青光眼协会(American Glaucoma Society,AGS)关于MIGS的定义是一种内路或外路的降眼压方式,该术式巩膜切口较小或无巩膜切口,同时伴有很少或无结膜操作 [ 7 ]。房水经小梁网流出的阻力来自于近端(小梁网、Schlemm管内壁)和远端(Schlemm管外壁、集液管、房水静脉、巩膜内静脉丛) [ 8 , 9 ],因此可以把小梁网相关的MIGS手术根据作用位点不同,分为近端阻力解除(增加小梁网旁路、扩张Schlemm管及小梁网切开)、远端阻力解除和全部阻力解除手术。还有一些MIGS通过增加经脉络膜上腔途径引流或破坏睫状体减少房水生成,达到降低眼压的目的。根据降压原理及作用位点的不同,本文将目前文献报道的诸多MIGS术式进行小结( 表1 ),并据此逐一展开常见术式的原理介绍及降压效果讨论,以期增加临床医生对MIGS的了解。
作用途径分类   MIGS装置或术式 生产厂家 路径 工作原理 植入装置的材料及大小 眼压降低幅度 抗青光眼药物使用减少情况
近端阻力解除 小梁网旁路 iStent [ 10 ] 美国Glaukos公司 内路 L型支架经小梁插入Schlemm管 肝素表面处理的钛材料;长1 mm,高0.33 mm 15.30% 38.00%
    iStent inject [ 10 ] 美国Glaukos公司 内路 直支架经小梁插入Schlemm管;需要植入2个支架 肝素表面处理的钛材料;长360 μm,高230 μm 29.10% 34.00%
  扩张Schlemm管 Hydrus [ 10 ] 瑞士Alcon公司 内路 新月形支架经小梁插入Schlemm管,同时扩张90°-120°的Schlemm管 镍钛合金;长8 mm,高0.3 mm 34.40%  
    iTrack,内路粘小管成形(ABiC) [ 10 ] 澳大利亚Ellex Medical Lasers公司 内路 微导管引导下,粘弹剂扩张Schlemm管   36.20% 62.10%
  小梁网切开 小梁消融术(Trabectome) [ 10 ] 美国NeoMedix Corporation公司 内路 消融小梁网及Schlemm管内壁,同时保持持续灌注和抽吸   24.00% 31.60%
    Kahook双刀 [ 10 ] 美国New World Medical公司 内路 经斜面双刀片切开小梁网   25.10% 64.10%
    AIDA,准分子激光小梁切开术(ELT) [ 11 ] 德国Glautec AG公司   准分子激光将小梁网上消融出数个微孔开口   1年30%;2年24% 无明显减少
    iTrack 250A,内路房角镜辅助及微导管引导全周小梁切开术 [ 10 ] 美国iScience Interventional公司 内路 微导管引导下,全周切开小梁网及Schlemm管内壁   36.50% 56.10%
    TRAB360 [ 12 ] 美国Sight Sciences公司 内路 尼龙样、可伸展弯曲的小梁切开刀,进入Schlemm管实现全周切开小梁网及Schlemm管内壁   降低(7.3±6.7)mmHg(1年) 从术前的(1.7±1.3)种减少至(1.1±1.0)种(1年)
全部阻力解除   XEN [ 10 ] 美国Allergan公司 内路 支架经小梁插入结膜下 猪明胶与戊二醛交联;长6.0 mm,高0.5 mm 38.80% 59.90%
    PRESERFLO(既往称为InnFocus) [ 10 ] 日本Santen公司 外路 支架经结膜下插入前房 新型聚合物(styrene block iso butylene block-styrene);长8.5 mm,管腔外径350 μm,内径70 μm 50.00% 83.30%
增加经脉络膜上腔途径引流   Cypass [ 13 ](已退市) 瑞士Alcon公司 内路 支架从前房插入脉络膜上腔 聚酰亚胺;长6.35 mm,外径510 μm,内径305 μm 30.2%(2年) 85.7%(2年)
    iStent Supra [ 14 ] 美国Glaukos公司 内路 支架从前房插入脉络膜上腔 一种弯曲的生物相容多聚物和钛组成的肝素涂层装置;长4 mm,直径165 μm 46.8%(1年) 尚无数据
    The Solx Gold Shunt [ 14 ] 美国SOLX公司 外路 扁平矩形支架,从前房插入脉络膜上腔 纯金,宽3.2 mm,长5.2 mm,厚44-68 μm 10.5 mmHg(5年降幅38.8%) 38.50%
    The STARflo [ 14 ] 比利时iSTAR Medical公司 外路 支架将房水从前房引流入脉络膜上腔 专有的多孔硅材料制成,长8 mm,宽5 mm,厚275 μm 术前37 mmHg降至术后1年的14.5 mmHg(降幅60.8% ) 3.3种减少至1.5种(降幅54.5%)
    iSTAR MINIject [ 15 ] 比利时iSTAR Medical公司 内路 支架将房水从前房引流入脉络膜上腔 新型多孔硅胶材料STAR 39.10% 24例患者中有21例(87.5%)未使用药物
减少房水生成   超声睫状体成形术 [ 16 ] 法国Eye Tech Care公司   高强度聚焦超声,诱导睫状体凝固   术前27.7 mmHg降至术后1年的19.8 mmHg 从3.2种降至2.3种
    微脉冲睫状体光凝术 [ 17 , 18 , 19 ] 美国Iridex公司   多段短暂激光能量破坏睫状体,同时减少热传导   41.6%~51%  
    内镜下睫状体光凝术 [ 20 ] 美国Beaver-Visitec International Medical公司   内窥镜下直视睫状体,微小激光探针发射激光破坏睫状体   从术前的(21.8±6.6)mmHg降至术后24个月的(17.9±4.9)mmHg (2.0±1.0)种减至(1.2±0.8)种
不同MIGS术式小结

注:MIGS:微创青光眼手术 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa

试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Tham YC Li X Wong TY et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ophthalmology 2014121(11)∶20812090. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
郑蓥蓥张玉秋王晓蕾Ex-press青光眼引流钉植入术治疗不同类型青光眼的长期临床观察[J]. 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志 202020(4)∶283289. DOI: 10.14166/j.issn.1671-2420.2020.04.004 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zheng YY Zhang YQ Wang XL et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of Ex-press glaucoma shunt implantation in the treatment of different types of glaucoma[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol Otorhinol 202020(4)∶283289. DOI: 10.14166/j.issn.1671-2420.2020.04.004 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[3]
季红朱颖婷张莹莹Ahemd与Baerveldt两种不同引流阀治疗青光眼的Meta分析[J]. 中国眼 耳鼻喉科杂志 201616(3)∶206211. DOI: 10.14166/j.issn.1671-2420.2016.01.017 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Ji H Zhu YT Zhang YY et al. Ahmed glaucoma valve versus Baerveldt glaucoma implant:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol Otorhinol 201616(3)∶206211. DOI: 10.14166/j.issn.1671-2420.2016.01.017 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[4]
陈霄雅王怀洲王宁利微创青光眼手术新进展[J]. 眼科 201423(1)∶6468. DOI: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2014.01.016 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Chen XY Wang HZ Wang NL . Update in micro-invasive glaucoma surgery[J]. Ophthalmol CHN 201423(1)∶6468. DOI: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2014.01.016 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[5]
周吉超张纯青光眼手术的微创时代[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志 201634(11)∶10521056. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2016.11.020 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhou JC Zhang C The era of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201634(11)∶10521056. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2016.11.020 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[6]
中华医学会眼科学分会青光眼学组中国微创青光眼手术适应证选择专家共识(2023)[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志 202341(6)∶521526. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20230311-00083 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Glaucoma Group of Ophthalmology Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese consensus on the selection of indications for minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (2023)[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 202341(6)∶521526. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20230311-00083 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[7]
Fellman RL Mattox C Singh K et al. American Glaucoma Society Position Paper:microinvasive glaucoma surgery[J]. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 20203(1)∶16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.12.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Roy Chowdhury U Bahler CK Hann CR et al. Isolation and characterization of novel primary cells from the human distal outflow pathway[J/OL]. Sci Rep 202111(1)∶4034[2023-09-15]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33597641/. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83558-6 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
McDonnell F Dismuke WM Overby DR et al. Pharmacological regulation of outflow resistance distal to Schlemm ' s canal [J]. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2018315(1)∶C44C51. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00024.2018 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Gillmann K Mansouri K Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery:where is the evidence?[J]. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 20209(3)∶203214. DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000294 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Deubel C Böhringer D Anton A et al. Long-term follow-up of intraocular pressure and pressure-lowering medication in patients following excimer laser trabeculotomy[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021259(4)∶957962. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-05029-4 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Sarkisian SR Mathews B Ding K et al. 360° ab-interno trabeculotomy in refractory primary open-angle glaucoma[J]. Clin Ophthalmol 201913161168. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S189260 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Vold S Ahmed II Craven ER et al. Two-year COMPASS trial results:supraciliary microstenting with phacoemulsification in patients with open-angle glaucoma and cataracts[J]. Ophthalmology 2016123(10)∶21032112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Lee R Bouremel Y Eames I et al. Translating minimally invasive glaucoma surgery devices[J]. Clin Transl Sci 202013(1)∶1425. DOI: 10.1111/cts.12660 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Denis P Hirneiß C Reddy KP et al. A first-in-human study of the efficacy and safety of MINIject in patients with medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (STAR-I)[J]. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 20192(5)∶290297. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.06.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Giannaccare G Vagge A Sebastiani S et al. Ultrasound cyclo-plasty in patients with glaucoma:1-year results from a multicentre p rospective study [J]. Ophthalmic Res 201961(3)∶137142. DOI: 10.1159/000487953 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Aquino MC Barton K Tan AM et al. Micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma:a randomized exploratory study[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 201543(1)∶4046. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12360 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Tan AM Chockalingam M Aquino MC et al. Micropulse transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of refractory glaucoma[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 201038(3)∶266272. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02238.x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Williams AL Moster MR Rahmatnejad K et al. Clinical efficacy and safety profile of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma[J]. J Glaucoma 201827(5)∶445449. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000934 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Yip LW Yong SO Earnest A et al. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of glaucoma:an Asian experience[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 200937(7)∶692697. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02120.x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Bahler CK Hann CR Fjield T et al. Second-generation trabecular meshwork bypass stent (iStent inject) increases outflow facility in cultured human anterior segments[J]. Am J Ophthalmol 2012153(6)∶12061213. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.12.017 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Richter GM Coleman AL . Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery:current status and future prospects[J]. Clin Ophthalmol 201610189206. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S80490 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Mathew DJ Buys YM . Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery:a critical appraisal of the literature[J]. Annu Rev Vis Sci 202064789. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-121219-081737 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Hengerer FH Auffarth GU Riffel C et al. Second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents as standalone treatment for glaucoma:a 36-month prospective study[J]. Adv Ther 201936(7)∶16061617. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-00984-9 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
Samuelson TW Sarkisian SR Jr Lubeck DM et al. Prospective,randomized,controlled pivotal trial of an ab interno implanted trabecular micro-bypass in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract:two-year results[J]. Ophthalmology 2019126(6)∶811821. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.006 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[26]
Jabłońska J Lewczuk K Rękas MT . Comparison of safety and efficacy of Hydrus and iStent combined with phacoemulsyfication in open angle glaucoma patients:24-month follow-up[J/OL]. Int J Environ Res Public Health 202320(5)∶4152[2023-09-15]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36901162/. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054152 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[27]
石砚王怀洲尹鹏微导管引导的内路小梁切开术治疗原发性先天性青光眼六个月的疗效[J]. 眼科 201928(3)∶165168. DOI: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2019.03.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Shi Y Wang HZ Yin P et al. Six-month outcomes of ab-interno microcatheter-assisted trabeculotomy in primary congenital glaucoma[J]. Ophthalmol CHN 201928(3)∶165168. DOI: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2019.03.002 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[28]
吴慧娟微创青光眼手术的新时代[J]. 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志 201616(3)∶149155+159. DOI: 10.14166/j.issn.1671-2420.2016.03.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wu HJ . The new era of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol Otorhinol 201616(3)∶149155+159. DOI: 10.14166/j.issn.1671-2420.2016.03.001 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[29]
Bitrian E Grajewski AL . Surgical management of childhood glaucoma[M]. BerlinSpringer 2018137146.
[30]
黄萍王怀洲吴慧娟小梁消融术疗效和安全性的临床观察[J]. 中华眼科杂志 201551(2)∶115119. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2015.02.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Huang P Wang HZ Wu HJ et al. Preliminary investigation on the safety and efficacy of trabectome[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol 201551(2)∶115119. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2015.02.011 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[31]
Kaplowitz K Bussel II Honkanen R et al. Review and meta-analysis of ab-interno trabeculectomy outcomes[J]. Br J Ophthalmol 2016100(5)∶594600. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307131 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[32]
Areaux RG Jr Grajewski AL Balasubramaniam S et al. Trabeculotomy ab interno with the trab360 device for childhood glaucomas[J]. Am J Ophthalmol 2020209178186. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[33]
Berlin MS Töteberg-Harms M Kim E et al. Surgical innovations in glaucoma[M]. BerlinSpringer 20148595.
[34]
Do AT Parikh H Panarelli JF . Subconjunctival microinvasive glaucoma surgeries:an update on the Xen gel stent and the PreserFlo MicroShunt[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 202031(2)∶132138. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000643 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[35]
De Gregorio A Pedrotti E Stevan G et al. XEN glaucoma treatment system in the management of refractory glaucomas:a short review on trial data and potential role in clinical practice[J]. Clin Ophthalmol 201812773782. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S146919 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[36]
Chatzara A Chronopoulou I Theodossiadis G et al. XEN implant for glaucoma treatment:a review of the literature[J]. Semin Ophthalmol 201934(2)∶9397. DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2019.1581820 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[37]
Marcos Parra MT Salinas López JA López Grau NS et al. XEN implant device v ersus trabeculectomy,either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification,in open-angle glaucoma patients [J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019257(8)∶17411750. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04341-y .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[38]
Wagner FM Schuster AK Emmerich J et al. Efficacy and safety of XEN ® -implantation vs.trabeculectomy:data of a " real-world " setting [J/OL]. PLoS One 202015(4)∶e0231614[2023-09-15]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32310972/. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231614 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[39]
Fernández-García A Zhou Y García-Alonso M et al. Medium-term clinical ou tcomes following Xen45 device implantation [J]. Int Ophthalmol 202040(3)∶709715. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01232-3 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[40]
Gabbay IE Allen F Morley C et al. Efficacy and safety data for the XEN45 implant at 2 years:a retrospective analysis[J]. Br J Ophthalmol 2020104(8)∶11251130. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-313870 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[41]
Costello Eye Physicians and Surgeons. XEN 45 gel stent[EB/OL].[ 2021/8/21]. https://costelloeye.com/minimally-invasive-glaucoma-surgery/xen-45-gel-implant/.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[42]
Kingshott P Wei J Bagge-Ravn D et al. Covalent attachment of poly (ethylene glycol) to surfaces,critical for reducing bacterial adhesion[J]. Langmuir 200319(17)∶69126921. DOI: 10.1021/la034032m .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[43]
Beckers HJ Pinchuk L Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery with a new ab-externo subconjunctival bypass-current status and review of literature[J/OL]. Eur Ophthalmic Rev 201913(1)∶27[2023-09-15]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336205507. DOI: 10.17925/EOR.2019.13.1.27 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[44]
Figus M Posarelli C Passani A et al. The supraciliary space as a suitable pathway for glaucoma surgery:ho-hum or home run?[J]. Surv Ophthalmol 201762(6)∶828837. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.05.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[45]
Figus M Posarelli C Passani A et al. The supraciliary space as a suitable pathway for glaucoma surgery:ho-hum or home run?[J]. Surv Ophthalmol 201762(6)∶828837. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.05.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[46]
Reiss G Clifford B Vold S et al. Safety and effectiveness of cypass supraciliary micro-stent in primary open-angle glaucoma:5-year results from the COMPASS XT study[J]. Am J Ophthalmol 2019208219225. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.015 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[47]
Vold S Ahmed II Craven ER et al. Two-year COMPASS trial results:supraciliary microstenting with phacoemulsification in patients with open-angle glaucoma and cataracts[J]. Ophthalmology 2016123(10)∶21032112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[48]
Lass JH Benetz BA He J et al. Corneal endothelial cell loss and morphometric changes 5 years after phacoemulsification with or without cypass micro-stent[J]. Am J Ophthalmol 2019208211218. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.016 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[49]
Myers JS Masood I Hornbeak DM et al. Prospective evaluation of two iStent ® trabecular Stents,one iStent Supra ® suprachoroidal Stent,and postoperative prostaglandin in refractory glaucoma:4-year outcomes [J]. Adv Ther 201835(3)∶395407. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0666-4 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[50]
Denis P Hirneiß C Reddy KP et al. A first-in-human study of the efficacy and safety of MINIject in patients with medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (STAR-I)[J]. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 20192(5)∶290297. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.06.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[51]
Francis BA Kawji AS Vo NT et al. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) in the management of uncontrolled glaucoma with prior aqueous tube shunt[J]. J Glaucoma 201120(8)∶523527. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f46337 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[52]
Michelessi M Bicket AK Lindsley K Cyclodestructive procedures for non-refractory glaucoma[J/OL]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20184(4)∶CD009313[2023-09-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29694684/. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009313.pub2 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[53]
Aptel F Charrel T Lafon C et al. Miniaturized high-intensity focused ultrasound device in patients with glaucoma:a clinical pilot study[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201152(12)∶87478753. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8137 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[54]
Rabin RL Rabin AR Zhang AD et al. Co-management of cataract and glaucoma in the era of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 201829(1)∶8895. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000444 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
通信作者:叶娟,Email: nc.defudabe.ujznaujey
B
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
C
衷心感谢北京大学第三医院眼科张纯教授、孟素坤医生在本文构思、撰写及投稿过程中给予的指导与帮助
D
浙江省重点研发项目 (2019C03020)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号