临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
集束化认知行为干预在脑胶质瘤术后患者中的应用研究
高波
宗雪荣
田婷婷
李萌萌
王微
李波
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20240401-01751
Effects of bundled cognitive-behavior intervention in postoperative patients with glioma
Gao bo
Zong Xuerong
Tian Tingting
Li Mengmeng
Wang Wei
Li Bo
Authors Info & Affiliations
Gao bo
Neurosurgery Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272000, China
Zong Xuerong
Neurosurgery Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272000, China
Tian Tingting
Neurosurgery Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272000, China
Li Mengmeng
Neurosurgery Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272000, China
Wang Wei
Psychology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272000, China
Li Bo
Neurosurgery Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272000, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20240401-01751
182
67
0
0
1
1
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨集束化认知行为干预在脑胶质瘤术后患者中的应用效果。

方法采用便利抽样法,选取于2022年1月—2023年6月在济宁医学院附属医院神经外科行手术治疗的95例脑胶质瘤患者为研究对象。按照入组顺序分为观察组和对照组。对照组接受常规医疗护理干预,观察组在对照组基础上采取集束化认知行为干预。比较两组患者干预前后不同时间点中文版癌症自我管理效能量表(C-SUPPH)、简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)的得分变化。

结果重复测量方差分析结果显示,两组C-SUPPH、SF-36、SAS、SDS得分比较存在组间、时间及交互效应,差异均有统计学意义( P均<0.05)。在出院后1、3、6个月,观察组C-SUPPH、SF-36得分高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义( P均<0.05);在出院后3、6个月,观察组SAS、SDS得分低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义( P均<0.05)。

结论集束化认知行为干预能够增加脑胶质瘤术后患者的自我管理效能,改善其生活质量,缓解其焦虑、抑郁情绪。

干预;集束化认知行为干预;脑胶质瘤;自我管理效能;生活质量
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of bundled cognitive-behavior intervention in postoperative patients with glioma.

MethodsFrom January 2022 to June 2023, convenience sampling was used to select 95 patients with glioma who underwent surgical treatment at the Neurosurgery Department of Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University as subjects. The patients were divided into an observation group and a control group based on the order of enrollment. The control group received routine medical nursing intervention, while the observation group received bundled cognitive-behavior intervention on the basis of control group. The scores of the Chinese-Strategies Used by People to Promote Health (C-SUPPH), Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were compared between two groups of patients at different time points before and after intervention.

ResultsRepeated measures analysis of variance showed that there were intergroup, time, and interaction effects between the C-SUPPH, SF-36, SAS, and SDS scores of the two groups, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge, the C-SUPPH and SF-36 scores in observation group were lower than those in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). At 3 and 6 months after discharge, the SAS and SDS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05) .

ConclusionsBundled cognitive-behavior intervention can increase the self-management efficacy of postoperative glioma patients, improve their quality of life, and alleviate their anxiety and depression.

Intervention;Bunched cognitive-behavior intervention;Glioma;Self-management efficacy;Quality of life
Li Bo, Email: mocdef.6ab217399745obil
引用本文

高波,宗雪荣,田婷婷,等. 集束化认知行为干预在脑胶质瘤术后患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2024,30(23):3195-3200.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20240401-01751

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
脑胶质瘤具有复发率高、疾病进展迅速、死亡率高等特点,是所有脑肿瘤中死亡率最高的肿瘤,且发病率呈逐年上升趋势,5年病死率在全身恶性肿瘤中排第三位 [ 123 ]。脑胶质瘤的临床表现主要包括头痛、头晕、恶心、呕吐等,严重者会出现认知功能障碍和癫痫发作。脑胶质瘤的治疗以手术切除肿瘤为主,辅助放疗、化疗以延长患者生存期,但预后仍较差 [ 45 ]。手术并发症以及化疗引起的不良反应会对患者造成很大影响,导致生活质量下降 [ 6789 ]。患者术后会经历较长时间的自我管理阶段,自我效能感是患者自我管理过程中的重要感受之一 [ 1011 ],它不仅能增强患者的康复信念,还能提高患者适应突发疾病的能力,从而改善患者的生活质量。目前临床上关于脑胶质瘤术后患者的干预方式相对比较单一,更多是注重患者的认知需求,而忽视了健康行为的改变。因此,本课题组整合多种行为干预策略,以"认知行为干预理论""行为改变整合理论""集束化干预策略"为指导,提出集束化认知行为干预方案 [ 9 ],旨在探讨集束化认知行为干预对脑胶质瘤术后患者自我效能感和生活质量的影响,力求为患者提供更科学有效的脑胶质瘤术后康复干预方案。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Xu H Zhang A Han X et al. ITGB2 as a prognostic indicator and a predictive marker for immunotherapy in gliomas[J]. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2022713):645-660. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03022-2 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Du Q Lin Y Zhang W et al. Bioinformatics analysis of LMAN1 expression,clinical characteristics,and its effects on cell proliferation and invasion in glioma[J]. Brain Res 20221789147952. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.147952 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
中国抗癌协会脑胶质瘤专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会脑胶质瘤整合诊治指南(精简版)[J]. 中国肿瘤临床 20224916):811-818. DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2022.20220728 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Brain Glioma Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association. China Anti-Cancer Association guidelines for integrative diagnosis and treatment of glioma(abridged version)[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology 20224916):811-818.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[4]
Chen R Zhang H Wu W et al. Antigen presentation machinery signature-derived CALR mediates migration,polarization of macrophages in glioma and predicts immunotherapy response[J]. Front Immunol 202213833792. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.833792 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
梁倩张辉. MRI影像组学在脑胶质瘤中的研究进展[J]. 磁共振成像 2024152):192-197. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2024.02.031 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Liang Q Zhang H . Research progression of MRI radiomics in glioma[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2024152):192-197.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[6]
Tan XH Zhou HD Hou LB et al. Expression and prognosis of GNG5 in lower-grade glioma using public database[J]. All Life 2022151):1101-1116. DOI: 10.1080/26895293.2022.2131636 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
刘琴朱国华. 胶质瘤术后患者心理安全感的影响因素与生活质量的相关性[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志 2023311):37-41. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2023.01.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Liu Q Zhu GH . Influencing factors of psychological security in patients with glioma after operation and study on correlation between psychological security and quality of life[J]. China Journal of Health Psychology 2023311):37-41.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[8]
高敏孟晓静李翔. 神经胶质瘤病人症状群评估工具研究进展[J]. 护理研究 2023374):645-649. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.04.015 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Gao M Meng XJ Li X et al. Research progress of symptom cluster assessment tools in patients with glioma[J]. Chinese Nursing Research 2023374):645-649.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[9]
高波宗雪荣盛艳. 集束化认知行为干预对脑胶质瘤患者疾病恐惧及心理安全感的影响[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志 2024333):252-258. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371468-20230904-00086 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Gao B Zong XR Sheng Y et al. Effects of bunched cognitive behavior intervention on disease fear and psychological security in glioma patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science 2024333):252-258.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[10]
Durosier Mertilus DS Lengacher CA Rodriguez CS . A review and conceptual analysis of cancer pain self-management[J]. Pain Manag Nurs 2022232):168-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.04.005 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
邓雁余琼武福姣. 基于自我效能理论的护理干预对食管癌根治术后患者的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志 2022579):1042-1048. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.09.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Deng Y Yu Q Wu FJ et al. Effects of nursing intervention strategies based on self-efficacy theory on nutritional status and cancer induced fatigue after total thoracoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer[J]. Chin J Nurs 2022579):1042-1048.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[12]
国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局中国抗癌协会脑胶质瘤专业委员会中国医师协会脑胶质瘤专业委员会. 脑胶质瘤诊疗指南(2022版)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志 2022388):757-777. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20220510-00239 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Lev EL Owen SV . A measure of self-care self-efficacy[J]. Res Nurs Health 1996195):421-429. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199610)19:5&lt;421::AID-NUR6&gt;3.0.CO;2-S .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
钱会娟袁长蓉. 中文版癌症自我管理效能感量表的信效度测评[J]. 中华护理杂志 2011461):87-89. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2011.01.032 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Qian HJ Yuan CR . The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of cancer self-management efficacy scale[J]. Chin J Nurs 2011461):87-89.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[15]
Ware J Snoww K Kosinski MA et al. SF-36. Health survey:manual and interpretation guide[J]. Health Assessment Lab 1993.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
李鲁王红妹沈毅. SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J]. 中华预防医学杂志 2002362):569-572. DOI: 10.3760/j:issn:0253-9624.2002.02.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Li L Wang HM Shen Y et al. Development and psychometric tests of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales[J]. Chin J Prev Med 2002362):109-113.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[17]
段泉泉胜利. 焦虑及抑郁自评量表的临床效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志 2012269):676-679. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2012.09.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Duan QQ Shen L . Differential validity of SAS and SDS among psychiatric non-psychotic outpatients and their partners[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal 2012269):676-679.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[18]
罗常月焦鹏屠淑敏. RAC3在脑胶质瘤组织的表达及其对脑胶质瘤细胞迁移与侵袭能力的影响[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志 2023176):758-761. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.115807-20221216-00374 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Luo CY Jiao P Tu SM . Clinical significance of RAC3 expression in glioma tissue and its effect on migration and invasion ability of glioma cells[J]. Chin J Endocr Surg 2023176):758-761.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[19]
Bandura A . Self-efficacy:toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J]. Psychol Rev 1977842):191-215. DOI: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
钱春艳付旭东韩晓霞. 自我效能干预对胶质瘤患者术后自我管理效能、心理状态及癌因性疲乏的影响[J]. 癌症进展 2023213):265-268. DOI: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2023.21.03.08 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Qian CY Fu XD Han XX et al. Effect of self-efficacy intervention on postoperative self-management efficacy,psychological state and cancer-related fatigue of patients with glioma[J]. Oncology Progress 2023213):265-268.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[21]
虞倩倩傅翠霞陈丽琴. 基于自我效能的心理护理在改善乳腺癌患者自我效能感及生活质量中的应用[J]. 国际护理学杂志 20224117):3109-3112. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20200605-00786 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
孔芳芳谢丹. Orem自护模式结合支持性护理干预对妇科肿瘤患者生活质量的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志 20222820):2765-2769. 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20220125-00416 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Kong FF Xie D . Effects of Orem self-care model combined with supportive nursing intervention on quality of life of gynecological tumor patients[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs 20222820):2765-2769.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[23]
王珊尤慧华成园园. 基于认知行为疗法的护理干预在喉癌患者中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志 20222812):1649-1652. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20211020-04727 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wang S You HH Cheng YY . Effects of nursing intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with laryngeal cancer[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs 20222812):1649-1652.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[24]
杨艳红孔薇马艳. 认知行为干预对子宫内膜癌手术患者心理状态、自我效能及生活质量的影响[J]. 癌症进展 20211918):1937-1940. DOI: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2021.19.18.27 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Yang YH Kong W Ma Y et al. Effect of cognitive-behavioral intervention on the mental state,self-efficacy,and quality of life of patients undergoing endometrial carcinoma surgery[J]. Oncology Progress 20211918):1937-1940.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[25]
陈雪虹冯燕李海燕. 认知行为疗法联合家庭康复干预对改善抑郁症患者效果的影响[J]. 中国实用护理杂志 20193535):2725-2730. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2019.35.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Chen XH Feng Y Li HY . Effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy combined with family rehabilitation therapy on improving depression patients[J]. Chin J Prac Nurs 20193535):2725-2730.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
备注信息
A
李波,Email: mocdef.6ab217399745obil
B

高波:研究设计、干预实施、论文撰写、修改;宗雪荣:研究设计、论文撰写、干预实施、数据整理;田婷婷:干预实施、数据收集;李萌萌:干预实施、数据收集;王微:研究设计、干预指导;李波:研究设计、论文修改

C
高波,宗雪荣,田婷婷,等.集束化认知行为干预在脑胶质瘤术后患者中的应用研究[J].中华现代护理杂志,2024,30(23):3195-3200. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20240401-01751.
D
所有作者声明无利益冲突
E
济宁市科技局2022年重点研发计划 (2022YXNS031)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号