预防研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
基于自动乳腺超声远程阅片模式进行乳腺癌筛查的前瞻性多中心队列研究
党晓智
高毅
顾翔
巨艳
易东生
林欢
任毅
袁筱婕
宋宏萍
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240204-00064
Prospective multicenter cohort study on breast cancer screening using an automated breast ultrasound with remote reading
Dang Xiaozhi
Gao Yi
Gu Xiang
Ju Yan
Yi Dongsheng
Lin Huan
Ren Yi
Yuan Xiaojie
Song Hongping
Authors Info & Affiliations
Dang Xiaozhi
Department of Ultrasound, Xijing Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an710032, China
Gao Yi
School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518060, China
Gu Xiang
School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen518060, China
Ju Yan
Department of Ultrasound, Xijing Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an710032, China
Yi Dongsheng
Department of Breast Surgery, Futian District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen518045, China
Lin Huan
Department of Breast, The Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou510130, China
Ren Yi
Department of Breast, Xuzhou Cancer Hospital, Xuzhou Hospital affiliated to Jiangsu University, Xuzhou221005, China
Yuan Xiaojie
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an710032, China
Song Hongping
Department of Ultrasound, Xijing Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an710032, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240204-00064
190
43
0
0
1
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的构建基于自动乳腺超声(ABUS)远程阅片模式的乳腺癌筛查网络,探讨ABUS远程阅片模式用于乳腺癌筛查的价值。

方法构建包括1个远程阅片中心和48个图像采集中心的远程乳腺癌筛查网络。2021年1月至2023年1月在各图像采集中心连续招募参与乳腺癌筛查的女性,由技师操作ABUS采集全乳标准化超声图像,通过PVBUS系统传输至远程阅片中心,由2位医师分别独立阅片并出具筛查报告。美国放射学会的乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)1类和2类为筛查结果阴性,建议筛查对象每年进行1次乳腺超声检查;BI-RADS 3类、4类和5类为筛查结果阳性,BI-RADS 3类者建议每6个月进行1次乳腺超声检查,BI-RADS 4类和5类者建议进行病理学检查。

结果共纳入完成ABUS筛查并随访满12个月女性10 344人。经远程阅片诊断为BI-RADS 1类6 164人,2类2 626人,3类1 404人,4类135人,5类15人。ABUS筛查阳性率为15.0%(1 554/10 344)。ABUS远程阅片模式用于乳腺癌筛查的检出率为3.7/1 000(38/10 344),灵敏度为97.4%(38/39),特异度为85.3%(8789/10 305)。检出的38例乳腺癌中,浸润性癌占92.1%(35/38),0期和Ⅰ期乳腺癌占63.2%(24/38)。

结论基于ABUS远程阅片模式的乳腺癌筛查,为解决我国各地医疗资源和医务人员水平不均衡的问题提供了高效、可行的解决路径,实现了优质医疗资源下沉,提高了高质量筛查服务的可及性,并取得了良好的筛查效果,为乳腺癌筛查提供了新的模式选择。

乳腺肿瘤;筛查;自动乳腺超声;远程放射学
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo construct a remote screening network for breast cancer based on automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and explore the value of ABUS with remote reading for breast cancer screening.

MethodsWe constructed a remote breast cancer screening network including one remote reading center and 48 image-acquisition centers. We recruited women to participate in breast cancer screening at one of these image-acquisition centers from January 2021 to January 2023. The technicians collected the whole breast images using the ABUS. The images were then sent to the reading center through the PVBUS System and interpreted independently by two radiologists using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). BI-RADS categories 1 and 2 indicate negative screening results, and women diagnosed with these categories were recommended for annual breast ultrasound screening. BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5 indicate positive results. Women with BI-RADS category 3 lesions were recommended for follow-up examinations every 6 months using ABUS or handheld ultrasound, while those with BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were suggested to undergo pathological examinations.

ResultsIn our study, we enrolled 10 344 women who completed the ABUS screening and were followed up for more than 12 months. After remote reading, 6 164 women were diagnosed with BI-RADS category 1 and 2 626 woman were within BI-RADS category 2. In contrast, 1 404 women were within BI-RADS category 3, a total of 135 women were within BI-RADS category 4, and 15 women were within BI-RADS category 5. The positive screening rate of ABUS was 15.0% (1 554/10 344). The ABUS with remote reading had a detection rate of 3.7/1 000 (38/10 344) for breast cancer screening, with a sensitivity of 97.4% (38/39) and a specificity of 85.3% (8 789/10 305). Among the 38 breast cancer cases detected, 92.1% (35/38) were invasive carcinomas, and 63.2% (24/38) were stage 0 or Ⅰ breast cancers.

ConclusionsBreast cancer screening based on ABUS with remote reading provided an efficient and feasible solution to the problem of unevenly distributed medical resources and medical staff levels in various regions of China, enabling the decentralization of high-quality medical resources and improving the accessibility of high-quality screening services. It has provided an alternative for breast cancer screening in China.

Breast cancer;Screening;Automated breast ultrasound;Teleradiology
Song Hongping, Email: mocdef.labiamxofph.gnos

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04527510)

引用本文

党晓智,高毅,顾翔,等. 基于自动乳腺超声远程阅片模式进行乳腺癌筛查的前瞻性多中心队列研究[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志,2024,46(11):1067-1075.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240204-00064

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
GLOBOCAN 2020年的估计数据显示,乳腺癌已经成为世界发病率第一的癌种,中国乳腺癌新发病42万例,居中国女性恶性肿瘤之首 1。筛查可以实现乳腺癌的早发现和早治疗,使乳腺癌的死亡率降低20%左右 2。我国于2009年和2012年先后启动了农村妇女两癌(乳腺癌、宫颈癌)筛查项目和城市癌症早诊早治项目,但2015年全国适龄女性乳腺癌筛查的覆盖率仅为21.4% 3,远低于韩国和欧美各国 4 , 5 , 6,也远低于《中国乳腺癌筛查方案》中提出的筛查目标 7。欧美各国利用乳腺X线摄影筛查乳腺癌已经取得了很好的效果,但与欧美女性相比,我国女性致密型腺体占比高 8,乳腺X线摄影的灵敏度较低 9,并且乳腺X线摄影设备在我国基层医院普及率低 10,因此我国的乳腺癌筛查方案推荐手持超声作为首选筛查方式 7。但是,因存在手持超声对操作者依赖性强、结果可重复性差、专业乳腺超声医师严重不足、筛查过程质控困难等问题,严重影响了乳腺癌筛查的可及性、有效性和可靠性 10 , 11。自动乳腺超声(automated breast ultrasound,ABUS)是专为乳腺癌筛查研发的设备,拥有规范化的采集协议,可获得全乳标准化超声图像,并在专用的工作站进行阅片,真正意义上实现了超声检查的扫诊分离 12。研究表明,ABUS用于乳腺癌筛查可以克服操作者依赖性强的局限性,实现两位超声医师同时分别独立阅片诊断,可能比手持超声更适合于乳腺癌筛查 13。目前罕见将ABUS与远程放射学相结合用于乳腺癌筛查的研究,我们基于ABUS,构建了远程乳腺癌筛查网络,前瞻性纳入进行筛查的女性,评价了ABUS远程阅片模式在真实环境中用于乳腺癌筛查的有效性和可靠性。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Sung H , Ferlay J , Siegel RL ,et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021,71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review[J]. Lancet, 2012,380(9855):1778-1786. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
王鑫,李燕婕,雷林,. 中国适龄女性乳腺癌筛查服务的可及性:筛查率及其构成分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2023,44(8):1302-1308. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20230103-00001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Song SY , Lee YY , Shin HY ,et al. Trends in breast cancer screening rates among Korean women: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2005-2020[J]. Epidemiol Health, 2022,44:e2022111. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2022111 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer screening in the European Union (2017)[EB/OL]. ( 2017-05) [2024-01-30]. https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2017-05/2017_cancerscreening_2ndreportimplementation_en_0.pdf.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
DeSantis CE , Ma J , Goding Sauer A ,et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017,67(6):439-448. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21412 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
妇幼健康司. 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发宫颈癌筛查工作方案和乳腺癌筛查工作方案的通知[EB/OL]. ( 2021-12-31) [2024-01-29]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/fys/s3581/202201/cad44d88acca4ae49e12dab9176ae21 c.shtml .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Liu J , Liu PF , Li JN ,et al. Analysis of mammographic breast density in a group of screening Chinese women and breast cancer patients[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014,15(15):6411-6414. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.15.6411 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Uematsu T , Izumori A , Moon WK . Overcoming the limitations of screening mammography in Japan and Korea: a paradigm shift to personalized breast cancer screening based on ultrasonography[J]. Ultrasonography, 2023,42(4):508-517. DOI: 10.14366/usg.23047 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Fan L , Strasser-Weippl K , Li JJ ,et al. Breast cancer in China[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014,15(7):e279-289. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70567-9 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Evans A , Trimboli RM , Athanasiou A ,et al. Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging[J]. Insights Imaging, 2018,9(4):449-461. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-018-0636-z .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
van Zelst J , Mann RM . Automated three-dimensional breast US for screening: technique, artifacts, and lesion characterization[J]. Radiographics, 2018,38(3):663-683. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170162 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Lee JM , Partridge SC , Liao GJ ,et al. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening[J]. Clin Imaging, 2019,55:119-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.01.019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Mendelson EB , Böhm-Vélez M , Berg WA ,et al. ACR BI-RADS ultrasound. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system[M]. Reston:American College of Radiology, 2013.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Berg WA , Vourtsis A . Screening breast ultrasound using handheld or automated technique in women with dense breasts[J]. J Breast Imaging, 2019,1(4):283-296. DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbz055 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Yu ZG , Jia CX , Liu LY ,et al. The prevalence and correlates of breast cancer among women in Eastern China[J]. PLoS One, 2012,7(6):e37784. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037784 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
马兰,连臻强,赵艳霞,. 基于1 501 753名中国农村妇女乳腺癌筛查的乳腺超声优化流程分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2021,43(4):497-503. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20190828-00549 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
National Cancer Center. Center for Cancer Control and Information Services. Cancer screening 2017[EB/OL]. [ 2024-05-14]. https://ganjoho.jp/public/qa_links/report/pdf/Cancer_Screening_Performance_Measures_2017.pdf
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Lee EH , Kim KW , Kim YJ ,et al. Performance of screening mammography: a report of the alliance for breast cancer screening in Korea[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2016,17(4):489-496. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.489 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Lehman CD , Arao RF , Sprague BL ,et al. National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the breast cancer surveillance consortium[J]. Radiology, 2017,283(1):49-58. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016161174 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Kwon MR , Choi JS , Lee MY ,et al. Screening outcomes of supplemental automated breast US in Asian women with dense and nondensebreasts[J]. Radiology, 2023,307(4):e222435. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.489 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Brem RF , Tabár L , Duffy SW ,et al. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study[J]. Radiology, 2015,274(3):663-673. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132832 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Hayward JH , Lee AY , Sickles EA ,et al. Prevalent vs incident screen: why does it matter?[J]. J Breast Imaging, 2024:wbad096. DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad096 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Duffy SW , Tabar L , Vitak B ,et al. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2003,39(12):1755-1760. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00259-4 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
Berg WA , Blume JD , Cormack JB ,et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer[J]. JAMA, 2008,299(18):2151-2163. DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[26]
Ohuchi N , Suzuki A , Sobue T ,et al. Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2016,387(10016):341-348. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00774-6 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[27]
Muratov S , Canelo-Aybar C , Tarride JE ,et al. Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020,20(1):795. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07289-z .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[28]
Hofvind S , Bjurstam N , Sørum R ,et al. Number and characteristics of breast cancer cases diagnosed in four periods in the screening interval of a biennial population-based screening programme[J]. J Med Screen, 2006,13(4):192-196. DOI: 10.1177/096914130601300406 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[29]
徐志坚,刘炬,陈万青,. 乳腺癌机会性筛查规范路径专家共识[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2024,33(1):6-18. DOI: 10.11735/j.issn.1004-0242.2024.01.A002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[30]
瞿亚军,吕青. 我国乳腺癌预防若干问题的思考[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2020,27(11):1334-1339. DOI: 10.7507/1007-9424.202009088 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[31]
葛河威,马飞. 关注我国乳腺癌筛查面临的问题[J]. 英国医学杂志中文版, 2022,25(10):582. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9742.2022.10.123
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[32]
Yang S , Gao X , Liu L ,et al. Performance and reading time of automated breast US with or without computer-aided detection[J]. Radiology, 2019,292(3):540-549. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019181816 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
宋宏萍,Email: mocdef.labiamxofph.gnos
B

党晓智:采集和分析数据、起草论文、统计分析;高毅:酝酿和设计实验、实施研究、指导和技术支持、经费支持;顾翔、易东生、林欢、任毅:实施研究、采集数据、行政和技术支持;巨艳、袁筱婕:统计分析数据;宋宏萍:酝酿和设计实验、实施研究、采集分析数据、论文审阅、研究指导、经费支持

C

ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04527510)

D
党晓智, 高毅, 顾翔, 等. 基于自动乳腺超声远程阅片模式进行乳腺癌筛查的前瞻性多中心队列研究[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2024, 46(11): 1067-1075. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240204-00064.
E
所有作者声明无利益冲突
F
国家自然科学基金面上项目 (82071934)
陕西省国际科技合作计划重点项目 (2020KWZ-022)
陕西省高等教育教学改革研究重点项目 (21JZ009)
空军军医大学临床研究项目 (2021LC2210)
深圳市高等院校稳定支持计划重点项目 (20220810144949003)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号