临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
18F-NaF PET/CT冠状动脉斑块显像预测冠心病患者预后的价值
宇雪
李莉
靳春荣
洪钰
宋佳林
王波
王慧峰
司新成
师晓丽
武志芳
李思进
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20240228-00074
Prognostic value of 18F-NaF PET/CT coronary plaque imaging in patients with coronary heart disease
Yu Xue
Li Li
Jin Chunrong
Hong Yu
Song Jialin
Wang Bo
Wang Huifeng
Si Xincheng
Shi Xiaoli
Wu Zhifang
Li Sijin
Authors Info & Affiliations
Yu Xue
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
Li Li
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
Jin Chunrong
Department of Cardiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
Hong Yu
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
Song Jialin
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
Wang Bo
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
Wang Huifeng
Department of Cardiology, Taigang General Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030008, China
Si Xincheng
Department of Cardiology, Linfen Fourth People′s Hospital, Linfen 041000, China
Shi Xiaoli
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
Wu Zhifang
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
Li Sijin
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20240228-00074
323
73
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨 18F-NaF PET/CT冠状动脉斑块显像评估冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(CAD)患者长期预后的临床价值。

方法选取2015年9月至2022年10月多中心临床已确诊的54例CAD患者[男37例,女17例,年龄(57.2±9.8)岁]进行回顾性队列研究。患者在1周内完成 18F-NaF PET/CT及冠状动脉造影(CAG)检查,PET/CT显像均在山西医科大学第一医院进行。随访患者治疗后主要心血管不良事件(MACE)。建立ROC曲线,获得SUV max及冠状动脉主要分支所有病灶处SUV max累积值(S-SUV max)预测MACE的最佳阈值,采用Cox比例风险模型和Kaplan-Meier方法(log-rank检验)分析PET参数对MACE的预测价值。组间代谢参数差异行Mann-Whitney U检验。

结果54例患者中位随访时间为6.0(1.8,6.6)年,13例(24.1%)发生MACE,包括7例死亡、5例心肌梗死、1例严重心律失常。MACE患者S-SUV max明显高于非MACE组[2.64(2.08,4.49)与1.83(0.95,2.90); Z=-2.04, P=0.041];ROC曲线示S-SUV max预测MACE的最佳阈值为2.05(AUC=0.690);多因素Cox分析示,S-SUV max是MACE的强力预测因子[风险比( HR)=2.434(95% CI:1.547~3.828), P<0.001]。ROC曲线示SUV max预测MACE的最佳阈值为0.55(AUC=0.659),单因素Cox分析示SUV max是预测MACE的因素[ HR=10.192(95% CI:2.667~38.953), P=0.001]。在25例不完全血运重建(ICR)患者中,Kaplan-Meier分析示, 18F-NaF摄取阳性者[单支中度狭窄(狭窄40%~70%)病变处SUV max≥0.55]MACE发生率明显高于 18F-NaF摄取阴性者(5/14与0/11; χ 2=6.07, P=0.014)。

结论 18F-NaF PET/CT可作为CAD患者MACE的独立预测因子,并可定量评估中度冠状动脉狭窄的远期进展情况;未来其有望成为一种无创指导冠状动脉多支病变再血管化治疗决策的新方式。

冠状动脉疾病;心肌血管重建术;氟化钠;正电子发射断层显像术;体层摄影术,X线计算机
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical value of 18F-NaF PET/CT coronary plague imaging in evaluating the long-term prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted among 54 patients (37 males and 17 females, aged (57.2±9.8) years) diagnosed with CAD from a multicenter study between September 2015 and October 2022. All patients underwent 18F-NaF PET/CT and coronary angiography (CAG) within 1 week, and the PET/CT imaging was performed at the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were followed up. ROC curves were established to obtain the optimal thresholds of SUV max and accumulated SUV max of all lesions of main coronary artery branches (S-SUV max) for predicting MACE. Cox proportional risk model and Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test) were used to analyze the predictive value of PET parameters for MACE. Differences in metabolic parameters between 2 groups were compared by Mann-Whitney U test.

ResultsThe median follow-up time of the 54 patients was 6.0(1.8, 6.6) years, and 13(24.1%) patients developed MACE, including 7 deaths, 5 myocardial infarction and 1 severe arrhythmia. S-SUV max in MACE group was significantly higher than that in the non-MACE group (2.64(2.08, 4.49) vs 1.83(0.95, 2.90); Z=-2.04, P=0.041). ROC curve showed that the optimal threshold of S-SUV max for MACE prediction was 2.05 (AUC=0.690). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that S-SUV max was a strong predictor of MACE (hazard ratio ( HR)=2.434(95% CI: 1.547-3.828), P<0.001). ROC curve showed that the optimal threshold of SUV max to predict MACE was 0.55 (AUC=0.659), and univariate Cox analysis showed that SUV max was a factor to predict MACE ( HR=10.192 (95% CI: 2.667-38.953), P=0.001). In 25 patients with incomplete revascularization (ICR), Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the incidence of MACE in patients with positive 18F-NaF uptake (single medium stenosis (40%-70%) with SUV max≥0.55) was significantly higher than that in patients with negative 18F-NaF uptake (5/14 vs 0/11; χ 2=6.07, P=0.014).

Conclusions 18F-NaF PET/CT can be used as an independent predictor of MACE in patients with CAD and can quantitatively assess the long-term progression of moderate coronary artery stenosis. In the future, it is expected to be a new non-invasive way to guide the revascularization treatment decision of multi-vessel CAD.

Coronary artery disease;Myocardial revascularization;Sodium fluoride;Positron-emission tomography;Tomography, X-ray computed
Li Li, Email: mocdef.6ab21ililomoapiliem
引用本文

宇雪,李莉,靳春荣,等. 18F-NaF PET/CT冠状动脉斑块显像预测冠心病患者预后的价值 [J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2025,45(02):65-70.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20240228-00074

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
斑块进展、破裂及侵蚀是导致冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(简称冠心病;coronary artery disease, CAD)患者不良预后的重要原因 [ 1 ]。相关数据显示,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary artery intervention, PCI)患者中85.40%表现为冠状动脉多支血管病变,同时存在梗死相关的"罪犯血管"与引发心肌缺血的非"罪犯血管";在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI)患者中多支病变也高达40%,且多支病变患者死亡率更高、预后更差 [ 2 , 3 ]。然而,文献报道主要依据冠状动脉造影(coronary angiography, CAG)及临床指导的完全血运重建(complete revascularization, CR)术无法获得最佳预后 [ 4 ],其原因可能是CAG无法真正识别易损冠状动脉斑块的组织学特征 [ 5 ]。临床迫切需要寻找新的分子影像学技术指导多支病变CAD患者的再血管化治疗决策,继而改善预后。 18F-NaF PET/CT显像可靶向微钙化识别并量化斑块的易损性 [ 6 , 7 , 8 ],但其在预测多支病变CAD患者预后方面的价值尚不明确。本研究旨在探讨 18F-NaF PET/CT在预测多支病变CAD患者预后中的价值,以及能否为再血管化治疗决策提供新方法,进而早期评估及改善CAD患者的临床预后。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Ferraro RA , van Rosendael AR , Lu Y ,et al. Non-obstructive high-risk plaq ues increase the risk of future culprit lesions comparable to obstructive plaques without high-risk features: the ICONIC study [J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020,21(9):973-980. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa048 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Mancini GB , Hartigan PM , Bates ER ,et al. Prognostic importance of coronary anatomy and left ventricular ejection fraction despite optimal therapy: assessment of residual risk in the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation Trial[J]. Am Heart J, 2013,166(3):481-487. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.07.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Park DW , Clare RM , Schulte PJ ,et al. Extent, location, and clinical signi ficance of non-infarct-related coronary artery disease among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction [J]. JAMA, 2014,312(19):2019-2027. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.15095 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Lansky AJ , Ng VG , Maehara A ,et al. Gender and the extent of coronary atherosclerosis, plaque composition, and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012,5(3):Suppl-S62. S72DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.02.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Bom MJ , van der Heijden DJ , Kedhi E ,et al. Early detection and treatment of the vulnerable coronary plaque: can we prevent acute coronary syndromes?[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017,10(5):e005973. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005973 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Dietz M , Chironi G , Faraggi M . Reduced 18 F-sodium fluoride activity in coronary plaques after statin therapy [J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2021,22(8):e133. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab016 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Li L , Li X , Jia Y ,et al. Sodium-fluoride PET-CT for the non-invasive evaluation of coronary plaques in symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease: a cross-correlation study with intravascular ultrasound[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2018,45(12):2181-2189. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4122-0 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
刘纯宝兰晓莉张永学分子影像探测动脉粥样硬化易损斑块的靶点研究进展[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志 2016,36(6):560-564. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2016.06.022 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Liu CB , Lan XL , Zhang YX . Targets of molecularimaging for detection of atherosclerosis vulnerable plaques[J]. Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2016,36(6):560-564. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2016.06.022 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[9]
Lawton JS , Tamis-Holland JE , Bangalore S ,et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022,145(3):e18-e114. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Oqab Z , Kunadian V , Wood DA ,et al. Complete revascularization versus culprit-lesion-only PCI in STEMI patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the COMPLETE trial[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2023,16(9):e012867. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012867 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Visseren F , Mach F , Smulders YM ,et al. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice[J]. G Ital Cardiol (Rome), 2022,23(6):Suppl 1-e3. e115DOI: 10.1714/3808.37926 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Høilund-Carlsen PF , Sturek M , Alavi A ,et al. Atherosclerosis imaging with 18 F-sodium fluoride PET: state-of-the-art review [J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2020,47(6):1538-1551. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04603-1 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Fletcher AJ , Lembo M , Kwiecinski J ,et al. Quantifying microcalcification activity in the thoracic aorta[J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2022,29(3):1372-1385. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02458-w .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Kwiecinski J , Tzolos E , Meah MN ,et al. Machine learning with 18 F-sodium fluoride PET and quantitative plaque analysis on CT angiography for the future risk of myocardial infarction [J]. J Nucl Med, 2022,63(1):158-165. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262283 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Moss A , Daghem M , Tzolos E ,et al. Coronary atherosclerotic plaque activity and future coronary events[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2023,8(8):755-764. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1729 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Kwiecinski J , Tzolos E , Adamson PD ,et al. Coronary 18 F-sodium fluoride uptake predicts outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020,75(24):3061-3074. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.046 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Fletcher AJ , Tew YY , Tzolos E ,et al. Thoracic aortic 18 F-sodium fluoride activity and ischemic stroke in patients with established cardiovascular disease [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2022,15(7):1274-1288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.12.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Bossard M , Mehta SR . Complete or incomplete revascularization for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the PRAMI trial to COMPLETE[J]. Interv Cardiol Clin, 2020,9(4):433-440. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2020.06.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Mehta SR , Wang J , Wood DA ,et al. Complete revascularization vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention for angina-related quality of life in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the COMPLETE randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2022,7(11):1091-1099. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.3032 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Wood DA , Cairns JA , Wang J ,et al. Timing of staged nonculprit artery revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: COMPLETE trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019,74(22):2713-2723. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.051 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Xaplanteris P , Fournier S , Pijls N ,et al. Five-year outcomes with PCI guided by fractional flow reserve[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018,379(3):250-259. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803538 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Wang LJ , Han S , Zhang XH ,et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2019,19(1):49. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-019-1022-6 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
李莉,Email: mocdef.6ab21ililomoapiliem
B

宇雪:研究实施、统计学分析、论文撰写;李莉:研究设计及指导、论文修改、经费支持;靳春荣、洪钰、宋佳林、王波、王慧峰、司新成、师晓丽:研究实施;武志芳、李思进:研究指导、经费支持

C
所有作者声明无利益冲突
D
国家自然科学基金 (U22A6008)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号