临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
年龄相关性白内障患者中角膜内皮赘疣的临床特征分析
温悦
许梦尧
张钦
鲍永珍
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20230304-00074
Clinical features of cornea guttata in patients with age-related cataract
Wen Yue
Xu Mengyao
Zhang Qin
Bao Yongzhen
Authors Info & Affiliations
Wen Yue
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ocular Disease and Optometry Science, Beijing 100044, China
Xu Mengyao
Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing 100730, China
Zhang Qin
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ocular Disease and Optometry Science, Beijing 100044, China
Bao Yongzhen
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ocular Disease and Optometry Science, Beijing 100044, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20230304-00074
36
7
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的分析年龄相关性白内障患者角膜内皮赘疣(guttata)的患病率及危险因素。

方法采用横断面研究设计,选取2018年8月至2019年7月于北京大学人民医院眼科诊断为年龄相关性白内障拟行手术治疗的1 472例患者的完整病历资料,年龄50~89岁。根据角膜内皮显微镜图像判定guttata,计算guttata的总体患病率,以及不同性别、眼别、年龄分布的患病率;将患者分为guttata组96例130眼和非guttata组1 376例2 814眼,比较组间患者一般情况的差异。双眼患者纳入右眼进行分析,比较guttata组与非guttata组的角膜内皮细胞密度(CD)、细胞面积变异系数(CV)、六边形细胞百分比(6A)、眼轴长度(AL)、角膜白到白距离(WTW)、前房深度、角膜顶点厚度的差异,通过多因素Logistic回归分析guttata患病的危险因素;比较不同guttata分级间各影响因素的差异和guttata患者双眼各眼球生物测量参数差异。

结果在1 472例患者中,guttata患者96例(占6.52%);男性guttata的患病率为4.04%,明显低于女性的8.20%,差异有统计学意义( χ 2=10.058, P=0.002);guttata患者平均年龄为(71.19±8.57)岁;其中男24例、女72例;单眼guttata患者共62例;孤立guttata患者共39例。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,女性( OR=2.124,95% CI:1.306~3.455)、眼轴长( OR=1.201,95% CI:1.083~1.332)、前房深度浅( OR=0.439,95% CI:0.252~0.766)、角膜顶点厚度大( OR=1.008,95% CI:1.001~1.015)为guttata患病的危险因素。不同分级间单眼guttata与双眼guttata患者比例和孤立guttata与非孤立guttata患者比例比较差异均有统计学意义( χ 2=25.492、15.362,均 P<0.05)。不同guttata分级的CD、角膜顶点厚度差异均有统计学意义( F=3.264、5.784,均 P<0.05),其中guttata分级1的CD明显大于分级≥3,角膜顶点厚度明显薄于分级≥3,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.017)。单眼患者的患眼与对侧眼以及双眼guttata患者的双眼CD、CV、6A、AL、WTW、前房深度、角膜顶点厚度比较差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。

结论与guttata患病相关的危险因素有女性、长AL、浅前房、厚的角膜顶点厚度。单眼guttata以及孤立guttata患者的分级更低,随着分级增加,角膜顶点厚度增加,guttata患者的双眼眼球结构无明显差异。

角膜内皮赘疣;年龄相关性白内障;患病率;眼球生物测量参数
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence and risk factors of cornea guttata in patients with age-related cataract.

MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted.A total of 1 472 patients aged 50-89 years with complete medical records, who were diagnosed with age-related cataract and to undergo surgery, were enrolled at Peking University People's Hospital from August 2018 to July 2019.The presence of guttata was determined according to the specular microscopy images and the overall prevalence of guttata was calculated, as well as the prevalence rates of different gender, eye, and age distribution.Patients were divided into a guttata group (96 cases 130 eyes) and a non-guttata group (1 376 cases 2 814 eyes), and the differences in general information between groups were compared.The corneal endothelial cell density (CD), coefficient of variation of cell size (CV), fraction of hexagonal cells (6A), axial length (AL), white to white (WTW), anterior chamber depth, and corneal vertex thickness were compared between the two groups, and only the right eye of the patient with both eyes affected was included for analysis.The risk factors of guttata were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.Differences in influencing factors among different guttata grades were compared, and the differences in biometric parameters of each eye in both eyes of guttata patients were compared.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People's Hospital (No.2023PHB198-001).

ResultsOf the 1 472 patients, 96(6.52%) patients had cornea guttata.The prevalence rate of guttata in males was 4.04%, which was significantly lower than 8.20% in females ( χ 2=10.058, P=0.002).The average age of patients in the guttata group was (71.19±8.57) years old, with 24 males and 72 females, including 62 patients with monocular guttata and 39 patients with isolated guttata.Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that female (odds ratio [ OR]=2.124, 95% confidence interval [ CI]: 1.306-3.455), greater AL ( OR=1.201, 95% CI: 1.083-1.332), shallow anterior chamber depth ( OR=0.439, 95% CI: 0.252-0.766), and greater corneal vertex thickness ( OR=1.008, 95% CI: 1.001-1.015) were risk factors for guttata.There were statistically significant differences in the proportion of monocular guttata and biocular guttata among different grades groups, and between isolated guttata and non-isolated guttata ( χ 2=25.492, 15.362; both P<0.05).Differences in CD and corneal vertex thickness among different grades groups were statistically significant ( F=3.264, 5.784; both P<0.05).The CD was significanty higher and the corneal vertex thickness was significantly thinner in the grade 1 than in the grade ≥3 (both P<0.017).There was no statistically significant difference in binocular CD, CV, 6A, AL, WTW, anterior chamber depth, and corneal vertex thickness between both eyes of monocular or binocular guttata patients (all P>0.05).

ConclusionsThe risk factors of guttata include female, long AL, shallow anterior chamber depth, and thick corneal vertex thickness.The guttata grade of monocular guttata and isolated guttata patients is lower.With the increase of grade, the corneal vertex thickness increases.There is no difference in ocular structure between both eyes of guttata patients.

Cornea guttata;Age-related cataract;Prevalence;Ocular biometric parameters
Bao Yongzhen, Email: mocdef.aabniszyoabrd
引用本文

温悦,许梦尧,张钦,等. 年龄相关性白内障患者中角膜内皮赘疣的临床特征分析[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2025,43(03):243-249.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20230304-00074

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
角膜内皮赘疣(cornea guttata)由角膜内皮细胞产生的胶原和基底膜异常赘生物组成,其具体形成机制尚存在争议 [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]。guttata在裂隙灯显微镜下呈现银箔样外观,在角膜内皮显微镜下表现为边界清晰的类圆形暗区 [ 4 , 5 ]。guttata的总体患病率为3.3%~9.2%,多见于老年女性,其发生可能与眼球解剖结构有关,如前房深度、眼轴长度、中央角膜厚度等 [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]。尽管多数患者无明显临床症状,但guttata会增加眼内光散射,影响患者的视觉质量 [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]。目前,尚缺乏针对中国人群的guttata相关流行病学研究数据。白内障术前角膜内皮显微镜检查的普及有助于筛选guttata患者。本研究拟探讨年龄相关性白内障患者的guttata患病率、危险因素等临床特征,以及guttata分级的影响因素,旨在为guttata相关的眼球解剖学特征、发生机制研究提供依据和新思路。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Kitagawa K , Fujisawa A , Mizuno T ,et al. Twenty-three cases of primary cornea guttata[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol 200145(1)∶93-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-5155(00)00295-1 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Zoega GM , Arnarsson A , Sasaki H ,et al. The 7-year cumulative incidence of cornea guttata and morphological changes in the corneal endothelium in the Reykjavik Eye Study[J]. Acta Ophthalmol 201391(3)∶212-218. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02360.x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Son HS , Villarreal G Jr, Meng H ,et al. On the origin of ' guttae ' [J]. Br J Ophthalmol 201498(9)∶1308-1310. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305069 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Moshirfar M , Y Liu H , Vaidyanathan U ,et al. Diagnosis and management of pseudoguttata:a literature review [J]. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 20198(3)∶156-162.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Ong Tone S , Kocaba V , Böhm M ,et al. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy:the vicious cycle of Fuchs pathogenesis[J/OL]. Prog Retin Eye Res 202180100863[2024-06-16]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32438095. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100863 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Nagaki Y , Hayasaka S , Kitagawa K ,et al. Primary cornea guttata in Japanese patients with cataract:specular microscopic observations[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol 199640(4)∶520-525.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Higa A , Sakai H , Sawaguchi S ,et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for cornea guttata in a population-based study in a southwestern island of Japan:the Kumejima study[J]. Arch Ophthalmol 2011129(3)∶332-336. DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.372 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Zoega GM , Fujisawa A , Sasaki H ,et al. Prevalence and risk factors for cornea guttata in the Reykjavik Eye Study[J]. Ophthalmology 2006113(4)∶565-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Kitagawa K , Kojima M , Sasaki H ,et al. Prevalence of primary cornea guttata and morphology of corneal endothelium in aging Japanese and Singaporean subjects[J]. Ophthalmic Res 200234(3)∶135-138. DOI: 10.1159/000063656 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Price FW Jr, Feng MT . Impact of corneal guttata on cataract surgery results[J/OL]. J Cataract Refract Surg 201945(11)∶1692[2024-06-16]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31706533. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.08.048 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Watanabe S , Oie Y , Fujimoto H ,et al. Relationship between corneal guttae and quality of vision in patients with mild Fuchs ' endothelial corneal dystrophy [J]. Ophthalmology 2015122(10)∶2103-2109. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Augustin VA , Weller JM , Kruse FE ,et al. Influence of corneal guttae and nuclear cataract on contrast sensitivity[J]. Br J Ophthalmol 2021105(10)∶1365-1370. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315206 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Vogt A Weitere Ergebnisse der Spaltlampenmikroskopie des vordern Bulbusabschnittes[J]. Graefes Arhiv für Ophthalmologie 192110663-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857927.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Amin SR , Baratz KH , McLaren JW ,et al. Corneal abnormalities early in the course of Fuchs ' endothelial dystrophy [J]. Ophthalmology 2014121(12)∶2325-2333. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Nahum Y , Canton V , Ponzin D ,et al. Prevalence of guttae in the graft following corneal transplantation[J]. Br J Ophthalmol 201599(12)∶1660-1663. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306569 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
徐英男龙潭谢立信Fuchs角膜内皮营养不良患者白内障手术的临床观察[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 201416(1)∶41-44. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2014.01.009 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Xu YN , Long T , Xie LX . Clinical observations of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy after cataract surgery[J]. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201416(1)∶41-44. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2014.01.009 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[17]
范巍张广斌角膜内皮营养不良患者飞秒激光辅助白内障手术观察[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志 201840(1)∶40-44. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1477.2018.01.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Fan W , Zhang GB . Observation on the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery for patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy[J]. Chin J Ocul Traum Occupat Eye Dis 201840(1)∶40-44. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1477.2018.01.011 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[18]
Leonard BC , Jalilian I , Raghunathan VK ,et al. Biomechanical changes to Descemet ' s membrane precede endothelial cell loss in an early-onset murine model of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy [J]. Exp Eye Res 201918018-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.11.021 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Matthaei M , Hribek A , Clahsen T ,et al. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy:clinical,genetic,pathophysiologic,and therapeutic aspects[J]. Annu Rev Vis Sci 20195151-175. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-091718-014852 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Brunette I , Sherknies D , Terry MA ,et al. 3-D characterization of the corneal shape in Fuchs dystrophy and pseudophakic keratopathy[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201152(1)∶206-214. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4101 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Huang J , Tepelus TC , Baghdasaryan E ,et al. Correlation between guttata severity and thickness of Descemet ' s membrane and the central cornea [J]. Curr Eye Res 201944(8)∶849-855. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1600194 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Kocaba V , Katikireddy KR , Gipson I ,et al. Association of the gutta-induced microenvironment with corneal endothelial cell behavior and demise in fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018136(8)∶886-892. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.2031 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Bajaj RP , Fliotsos MJ , Pradeep T ,et al. Peripheral-to-central ratio of guttae:validity and reliability of an objective method to characterize severity of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021259(3)∶685-690. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04985-1 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
鲍永珍,Email: mocdef.aabniszyoabrd
B

温悦:实施研究、收集数据、分析数据、文章撰写;许梦尧:设计试验、收集数据;张钦:设计试验、文章写作指导;鲍永珍:设计试验、指导研究、对文章的知识性内容作批评性审阅及定稿

C
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
D
国家重点研发计划 (2020YFC2008200)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号