目的探讨剖宫产术中小剂量艾司氯胺酮单次静脉注射对初产妇产后抑郁的影响。
方法本研究为前瞻性随机对照研究,选取2021年1月至2023年12月西安国际医学中心医院接受计划性椎管内麻醉剖宫产的初产妇106例作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将初产妇分为对照组和观察组,每组53例。两组产妇在麻醉药物种类和使用方法上保持统一。观察组在胎儿娩出及脐带剪断后的5 min,通过静脉给予小剂量的艾司氯胺酮(0.2 mg/kg,溶解在0.9%氯化钠注射液10 mL中),而对照组则仅接受等量的0.9%氯化钠注射液作为安慰剂处理。比较两组在产后不同时间段(产后静脉注射3 d、7 d、14 d、30 d、42 d)的爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评分、产后抑郁症的发病率及术后3 d内发生的药物不良反应情况,同时评估宫缩疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。
结果观察组在产后3 d、7 d、14 d、30 d、42 d的EPDS评分分别为(6.23±1.21)分、(5.82±1.77)分、(6.14±1.20)分、(5.33±1.19)分、(6.01±1.23)分,均明显低于对照组的(8.99±1.28)分、(8.91±2.11)分、(9.03±1.94)分、(10.40±2.68)分、(9.28±1.84)分,差异均有统计学意义( t=11.40、8.16、9.22、12.58、10.75,均 P < 0.001)。观察组产妇在产后7 d、14 d的产后抑郁发生率均低于对照组产妇[3.77%(2/53)比16.98%(9/53),3.77%(2/53)比15.09%(8/53), χ 2=4.97、3.97, P=0.026、0.046]。两组行计划性椎管内麻醉经腹剖宫产手术的产妇在产后3 d内的用药不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义[15.09%(8/53)比11.32%(6/53), χ 2=0.32, P=0.566]。观察组在术后3 h、6 h、12 h、24 h的宫缩疼痛VAS评分分别为(2.13±0.28)分、(2.55±0.33)分、(2.73±0.35)分、(3.06±0.37)分,均明显低于对照组的(4.35±0.46)分、(5.43±0.36)分、(5.68±0.35)分、(5.26±0.43)分,差异均有统计学意义( t=30.01、42.93、43.38、28.23,均 P < 0.001)。
结论剖宫产术中小剂量艾司氯胺酮单次静脉注射可以在剖宫产后的短期内有效缓解初产妇情绪困扰,对于降低初产妇抑郁症发病率具有重要临床意义。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of a single intravenous injection of low-dose esketamine during cesarean section on postpartum depression in primiparas.
MethodsThis study is a prospective randomized controlled trial involving 106 primiparas who underwent scheduled intrathecal anesthesia for cesarean section at Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023. The participants were randomly assigned to either the control group or the observation group, with 53 women in each group, using a random number table method. Both groups received the same type and method of anesthesia. In the observation group, 5 minutes after the delivery of the fetus and the clamping of the umbilical cord, a low dose of esketamine (0.2 mg/kg, dissolved in 10 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride injection) was administered intravenously. The control group received an equivalent volume of 0.9% sodium chloride injection as a placebo. The score of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at various postpartum time intervals (3, 7, 14, 30, and 42 days), the incidence of postpartum depression, and any adverse drug reactions occurring within 3 days postoperatively were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the score of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for contraction pain was assessed.
ResultsThe scores of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the observation group at 3, 7, 14, 30, and 42 days postpartum were (6.23 ± 1.21), (5.82 ± 1.77), (6.14 ± 1.20), (5.33 ± 1.19), and (6.01 ± 1.23), respectively. These scores were significantly lower than those in the control group [(8.99 ± 1.28), (8.91 ± 2.11), (9.03 ± 1.94), (10.40 ± 2.68), (9.28 ± 1.84), t = 11.40, 8.16, 9.22, 12.58, 10.75, all P < 0.001]. The incidence of postpartum depression in the observation group at 7 and 14 days postpartum was significantly lower than that in the control group [3.77% (2/53) vs. 16.98% (9/53), 3.77% (2/53) vs. 15.09% (8/53), χ² = 4.97, 3.97, P = 0.026, 0.046]. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions within 3 days postoperatively between the two groups of women who underwent scheduled intrathecal anesthesia for cesarean section [15.09% (8/53) vs. 11.32% (6/53), χ² = 0.32, P = 0.566]. The scores of the Visual Analog Scale for contraction pain in the observation group at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively were (2.13 ± 0.28), (2.55 ± 0.33), (2.73 ± 0.35), and (3.06 ± 0.37), respectively. These scores were significantly lower than those in the control group [(4.35 ± 0.46), (5.43 ± 0.36), (5.68 ± 0.35), (5.26 ± 0.43), t = 30.01, 42.93, 43.38, 28.23, all P < 0.001].
ConclusionsA single intravenous injection of low-dose esketamine during cesarean section can effectively alleviate emotional distress in primiparas in the short term after surgery, which has significant clinical implications for reducing the incidence of postpartum depression.
王露,王彬荣,吕玉珠,等. 剖宫产术中单次静脉注射小剂量艾司氯胺酮对初产妇产后抑郁的影响[J]. 中国基层医药,2025,32(03):371-376.
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240706-00872版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
除非特别声明,本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编委会的观点。
王露:酝酿和设计实验、采集数据、起草文章等;王彬荣:采集数据、获取研究经费、支持性贡献等;吕玉珠:分析/解释数据、支持性贡献等、行政、技术或材料支持等;郑琴:采集数据、支持性贡献、指导等;商燕:统计分析、对文章的知识性内容作批评性审阅、获取研究经费等

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。