目的观察邮票植皮联合负压封闭引流(VSD)技术对糖尿病足部溃疡(DFU)的临床效果。
方法选取2020年1月至2022年12月丽水市中心医院收治的DFU患者80例为研究对象进行前瞻性研究,根据随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各40例;对照组采用VSD技术治疗;观察组给予邮票植皮联合VSD技术治疗;比较两组围手术期指标(创面愈合时间、住院时间、换药次数、肉芽组织生长进度)、疼痛情况[采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估]、足背血流动力学(足背动脉内径、动脉血流速度)、足部功能(采用Maryland足功能评分评估)和术后并发症发生情况。
结果观察组创面愈合时间、住院时间分别为(21.54±5.32)d、(27.08±5.97)d,短于对照组的(26.69±5.66)d、(31.49±6.80)d( t=4.19、3.08,均 P < 0.05)。观察组换药次数为(5.11±1.14)次,少于对照组的(8.07±1.59)次( t=9.56, P < 0.001)。观察组肉芽组织生长进度为(3.12±0.64)mm,快于对照组的(2.09±0.48)mm( t=8.14, P < 0.001);观察组术后1、2、3个月VAS评分分别为(3.52±0.65)分、(2.33±0.42)分、(1.40±0.26)分,低于对照组的(3.96±0.71)分、(2.74±0.44)分、(1.78±0.34)分( t=2.89、4.26、5.615,均 P < 0.05);术后3个月,观察组足背动脉内径、动脉血流速度分别为(2.64±0.44)mm、(36.42±6.28)cm/s,高于对照组的(2.18±0.41)mm、(30.97±5.33)cm/s( t=4.83、4.18,均 P < 0.001);术后3个月,观察组疼痛、足部功能、外观、活动度评分分别为(39.28±6.70)分、(48.10±7.22)分、(7.94±1.54)分、(12.15±2.35)分,高于对照组的(33.46±6.89)分、(43.08±6.68)分、(5.38±1.06)分、(10.69±2.16)分( t=3.83、3.22、8.66、2.89,均 P < 0.05);两组皮片坏死/移位、血肿积液、感染、溃疡复发等术后并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义( P > 0.05)。
结论邮票植皮联合VSD技术可显著加快DFU患者创面愈合,降低术后疼痛,改善足背血流动力学,提高足部功能,且安全性较好。
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of stamp skin grafting combined with vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
MethodsA prospective study was conducted involving 80 patients with diabetic foot ulcers admitted to Lishui Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022. The patients were divided into an observation group and a control group, with 40 patients in each group, using a random number table method. The control group received treatment with vacuum-sealing drainage technology, while the observation group was treated with stamp skin grafting combined with vacuum sealing drainage. The two groups were compared based on several perioperative indicators, including wound healing time, length of hospital stay, number of dressing changes, and progress of granulation tissue growth. Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. Additionally, dorsalis pedis blood flow dynamics were evaluated, focusing on the diameter of the dorsalis pedis artery and arterial blood flow velocity. Foot function was assessed using the Maryland Foot Function Scale. The occurrence of postoperative complications was recorded.
ResultsThe wound healing time and length of hospital stay in the observation group were (21.54 ± 5.32) days and (27.08 ± 5.97) days, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(26.69 ± 5.66) days, (31.49 ± 6.80) days, t = 4.19, 3.08, both P < 0.05]. The number of dressing changes in the observation group was (5.11 ± 1.14), which was significantly fewer than that in the control group [(8.07 ± 1.59), t = 9.56, P < 0.001]. The progress of granulation tissue growth in the observation group [(3.12 ± 0.64) mm] was faster that in the control group [(2.09 ± 0.48) mm, t = 8.14, P < 0.001]. At 1, 2, and 3 months post-surgery, the Visual Analog Scale scores for the observation group were (3.52 ± 0.65), (2.33 ± 0.42), and (1.40 ± 0.26), respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group [(3.96 ± 0.71), (2.74 ± 0.44), (1.78 ± 0.34), t = 2.89, 4.26, 5.615, all P < 0.05). At 3 months post-surgery, the diameter of the dorsalis pedis artery and arterial blood flow velocity in the observation group were (2.64 ± 0.44) mm and (36.42 ± 6.28) cm/s, respectively, which were greater than those in control group [(2.18 ± 0.41) mm, (30.97 ± 5.33) cm/s, t = 4.83, 4.18, both P < 0.001]. At 3 months post-surgery, the scores for pain, foot function, appearance, and range of motion in the observation group were (39.28 ± 6.70), (48.10 ± 7.22), (7.94 ± 1.54), and (12.15 ± 2.35), respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group [(33.46 ± 6.89), (43.08 ± 6.68), (5.38 ± 1.06), and (10.69 ± 2.16), t = 3.83, 3.22, 8.66, 2.89, all P < 0.05]. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications, including skin flap necrosis/dislocation, hematoma accumulation, infection, and ulcer recurrence, between the two groups ( P > 0.05).
ConclusionsStamp skin grafting combined with vacuum sealing drainage can significantly accelerate wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers, reduce postoperative pain, improve dorsalis pedis blood flow dynamics, enhance foot function, and demonstrate good safety.
毛幸,蔡晓斌,吴炳林,等. 邮票植皮联合负压封闭引流技术治疗糖尿病足部溃疡的效果观察[J]. 中国基层医药,2025,32(03):377-381.
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240712-00896版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
除非特别声明,本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编委会的观点。
毛幸:采集数据、起草文章;蔡晓斌、吴炳林:统计分析;刘舜平、蓝益南:采集数据;江洵:技术支持;设计试验、文章修订

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。