目的观察高通量血液透析联合血液灌流治疗尿毒症的临床效果。
方法选取2020年1月至2022年12月在温州医科大学附属衢州医院(衢州市人民医院)尿毒症患者80例为研究对象,进行前瞻性随机对照研究,采用随机数字表法分组,研究组40例采用高通量血液透析联合血液灌流治疗;对照组40例采用高通量血液透析治疗。采用竞争性酶联免疫法、免疫荧光测定法、全自动生化分析仪、免疫透射比浊法检测毒素清除、钙磷代谢、免疫功能、血管内皮功能;比较两组毒素清除情况、钙磷代谢、免疫功能、血管内皮功能的差异。
结果与治疗前比较,治疗后两组甲状旁腺激素(PTH)、血肌酐、β 2-微球蛋白、血尿素氮、血磷、晚期糖基化终末产物(AGEs)、细胞间黏附分子-1(ICAM-1)、同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)均降低[PTH:(353.28±50.26)ng/L比(235.26±31.51)ng/L、(357.17±52.18)ng/L比(174.16±26.35)ng/L;肌酐:(969.47±110.44)µmol/L比(511.57±91.96)µmol/L、(957.58±121.99)µmol/L比(414.37±87.41)µmol/L;β 2-微球蛋白:(40.27±7.98)mg/L比(22.06±3.26)mg/L、(41.65±8.40)mg/L比(17.70±3.43)mg/L;血尿素氮:(30.64±5.63)mmol/L比(14.02±2.80)mmol/L、(30.04±5.90)mmol/L比(10.07±1.94)mmol/L;血磷:(2.23±0.49)mmol/L比(1.80±0.36)mmol/L、(2.26±0.53)mmol/L比(1.53±0.31)mmol/L;Hcy:(35.87±5.34)µmol/L比(30.93±4.65)µmol/L、(36.21±5.27)µmol/L比(20.26±4.53)µmol/L;ICAM-1:(574.96±56.81)ng/L比(419.87±40.76)ng/L、(569.84±52.37)ng/L比(384.51±35.12)ng/L;AGEs:(330.41±43.69)mg/L比(297.64±38.59)mg/L、(326.98±41.25)mg/L比(165.42±15.74)mg/L],血钙、免疫球蛋白G(IgG)、免疫球蛋白M(IgM)、免疫球蛋白A(IgA)、CD 4 +、CD 4 +/CD 8 +、补体3(C3)、补体4(C4)均升高[血钙:(1.90±0.43)mmol/L比(2.27±0.32)mmol/L、(1.93±0.46)mmol/L比(2.61±0.36)mmol/L;IgG:(7.73±1.56)g/L比(9.21±2.04)g/L、(7.82±1.62)g/L比(10.7±2.02)g/L;IgM:(0.42±0.07)g/L比(1.29±0.11)g/L、(0.40±0.08)g/L比(1.52±0.08)g/L;IgA:(0.44±0.16)g/L比(1.54±0.25)g/L、(0.48±0.19)g/L比(1.93±0.38)g/L;CD 4 +:(32.77±5.71)%比(38.18±4.92)%、(32.11±5.34)%比(46.07±4.95)%;CD 4 +/CD 8 +:(1.07±0.14)比(1.29±0.15)、(1.07±0.17)比(1.61±0.26);C3:(0.80±0.12)g/L比(1.01±0.20)g/L、(0.79±0.14)g/L比(1.19±0.23)g/L;C4:(0.32±0.15)g/L比(0.67±0.17)g/L、(0.33±0.14)g/L比(0.86±0.12)g/L],两组比较,差异均有统计学意义( t=12.01、19.47、33.98、33.72、17.64、20.36、22.75、24.28、19.25、22.77、4.71、29.54、32.01、27.39、-5.06、-11.39、-4.79、-9.65、-61.55、-97.13、-36.63、-32.21、-7.71、-16.90、-5.78、-11.34、-9.21、-13.28、-13.25、-33.73,均 P < 0.05),且与对照组比较,研究组均更优( t=-9.40、-4.84、-5.82、-7.33、-3.59、-10.40、-4.16、-20.07、4.47、3.28、5.43、7.14、6.73、3.73、5.76,均 P < 0.05)。
结论高通量血液透析联合血液灌流治疗尿毒症可有效改善钙磷代谢及血管内皮功能,提高免疫功能与毒素清除率。
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of high-flux hemodialysis combined with hemoperfusion in patients with uremia.
MethodsEighty patients with uremia who received treatment at the Quzhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People's Hospital) from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected for this prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants were grouped using a random number table method, with 40 patients in the study group receiving high-flux hemodialysis combined with hemoperfusion, and 40 patients in the control group receiving high-flux hemodialysis alone. Toxicity clearance, calcium-phosphate metabolism, immune function, and vascular endothelial function were assessed using competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunofluorescence assay, fully automated biochemical analyzers, and immunoturbidimetric assay. The differences in toxicity clearance, calcium-phosphate metabolism, immune function, and vascular endothelial function were compared between the two groups.
ResultsCompared with before treatment, both groups showed a significant decrease in parathyroid hormone (PTH), blood creatinine, β 2-microglobulin, blood urea nitrogen, blood phosphorus, advanced glycation end products (AGEs), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and homocysteine (Hcy) after treatment. Specifically, PTH levels decreased from (353.28 ± 50.26) ng/L to (235.26 ± 31.51) ng/L in the control group and from (357.17 ± 52.18) ng/L to (174.16 ± 26.35) ng/L in the study group; blood creatinine decreased from (969.47 ± 110.44) µmol/L to (511.57 ± 91.96) µmol/L in the control group and from (957.58 ± 121.99) µmol/L to (414.37 ± 87.41) µmol/L in the study group; β 2-microglobulin decreased from (40.27 ± 7.98) mg/L to (22.06 ± 3.26) mg/L in the control group and from (41.65 ± 8.40) mg/L to (17.70 ± 3.43) mg/L in the study group; blood urea nitrogen decreased from (30.64 ± 5.63) mmol/L to (14.02 ± 2.80) mmol/L in the control group and from (30.04 ± 5.90) mmol/L to (10.07 ± 1.94) mmol/L in the study group; blood phosphorus decreased from (2.23 ± 0.49) mmol/L to (1.80 ± 0.36) mmol/L in the control group and from (2.26 ± 0.53) mmol/L to (1.53 ± 0.31) mmol/L in the study group ; Hcy decreased from (35.87 ± 5.34) µmol/L to (30.93 ± 4.65) µmol/L in the control group and from (36.21 ± 5.27) µmol/L to (20.26 ± 4.53) µmol/L in the study group; ICAM-1 decreased from (574.96 ± 56.81) ng/L to (419.87 ± 40.76) ng/L in the control group and from (569.84 ± 52.37) ng/L to (384.51 ± 35.12) ng/L in the study group; AGEs levels decreased from (330.41 ± 43.69) mg/L to (297.64 ± 38.59) mg/L in the control group and from (326.98 ± 41.25) mg/L to (165.42 ± 15.74) mg/L in the study group. Conversely, compared with before treatment,blood calcium, immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin M, immunoglobulin A, CD 4 +, CD 4 +/CD 8 + ratio, complement 3, and complement 4 all increased after treatment. Specifically, blood calcium increased from (1.90 ± 0.43) mmol/L to (2.27 ± 0.32) mmol/L in the control group and from (1.93 ± 0.46) mmol/L to (2.61 ± 0.36) mmol/L in the study group; IgG increased from (7.73 ± 1.56) g/L to (9.21 ± 2.04) g/L in the control group and from (7.82 ± 1.62) g/L to (10.7 ± 2.02) g/L in the study group; IgM increased from (0.42 ± 0.07) g/L to (1.29 ± 0.11) g/L in the control group and from (0.40 ± 0.08) g/L to (1.52 ± 0.08) g/L in the study group; IgA increased from (0.44 ± 0.16) g/L to (1.54 ± 0.25) g/L in the control group and from (0.48 ± 0.19) g/L to (1.93 ± 0.38) g/L in the study group; CD 4 + increased from (32.77 ± 5.71)% to (38.18 ± 4.92)% in the control group and from (32.11 ± 5.34)% to (46.07 ± 4.95)% in the study group; the CD 4 +/CD 8 + ratio increased from (1.07 ± 0.14) to (1.29 ± 0.15) in the control group and from (1.07 ± 0.17) to (1.61 ± 0.26) in the study group; C3 increased from (0.80 ± 0.12) g/L to (1.01 ± 0.20) g/L in the control group and from (0.79 ± 0.14) g/L to (1.19 ± 0.23) g/L in the study group; and C4 increased from (0.32 ± 0.15) g/L to (0.67 ± 0.17) g/L in the control group and from (0.33 ± 0.14) g/L to (0.86 ± 0.12) g/L in the study group. All these differences were statistically significant between the two groups ( t = 12.01, 19.47, 33.98, 33.72, 17.64, 20.36, 22.75, 24.28, 19.25, 22.77, 4.71, 29.54, 32.01, 27.39, -5.06, -11.39, -4.79, -9.65, -61.55, -97.13, -36.63, -32.21, -7.71, -16.90, -5.78, -11.34, -9.21, -13.28, -13.25, -33.73, all P < 0.05). Additionally, when compared with the control group, the study group showed superior results ( t = -9.40, -4.84, -5.82, -7.33, -3.59, -10.40, -4.16, -20.07, 4.47, 3.28, 5.43, 7.14, 6.73, 3.73, 5.76, all P < 0.05).
ConclusionsHigh-flux hemodialysis combined with hemoperfusion for the treatment of uremia can effectively improve calcium and phosphorus metabolism and vascular endothelial function, as well as enhance immune function and toxicity clearance rate.
翁明祥,李玉芳,刘春雅. 高通量血液透析联合血液灌流治疗尿毒症的效果观察[J]. 中国基层医药,2025,32(03):397-403.
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240705-00870版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
除非特别声明,本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编委会的观点。
翁明祥:采集数据、起草文章;李玉芳:统计分析、技术支持;刘春雅:设计试验、起草文章

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。