目的比较切开复位内固定与肱骨头置换术对于肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者肩关节功能恢复的疗效。
方法本研究为病例对照研究,选择2020年1月至2023年12月期间西安高新医院骨科接诊后采用手术治疗的肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者80例的数据实施回顾性分析。依据手术方法不同将患者分为两组:对照组( n=45)给予切开复位内固定治疗术,观察组( n=35)给予肱骨头置换术。比较两组患者的手术相关指标、术后3个月的治疗效果评级、肩关节活动度、肩关节功能状态、并发症发生率。
结果观察组术中失血量、手术时间、术后引流量、术后住院时间分别为(186.92±28.04)mL、(68.89±10.12)min、(57.89±11.25)mL、(10.18±2.41)d,均明显低于对照组的(218.23±35.57)mL、(98.26±15.34)min、(73.65±13.68)mL、(12.35±2.92)d,差异均有统计学意义( t=4.27、9.78、5.51、3.55,均 P < 0.05)。两组患者术后3个月的疗效差异无统计学意义[97.14%(34/35)比95.56%(43/45)]( χ 2=0.04, P > 0.05)。观察组患者在治疗后3个月的前屈上举、外旋、内旋的角度分别为(95.42±7.88)°,(61.37±6.56)°,(74.38±5.01)°,对照组分别为(93.68±7.75)°,(60.42±6.87)°,(73.75±4.92)°,差异均无统计学意义( t=-0.98、-0.62、-0.56,均 P > 0.05)。观察组在治疗后3个月的肩关节功能状态评分为(73.46±9.15)分,对照组为(71.75±8.66)分,差异无统计学意义( t=-0.85, P > 0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为2.86%(1/35),明显低于对照组的22.22%(10/45),差异有统计学意义( χ 2=4.70, P=0.030)。
结论针对肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者,切开复位内固定与肱骨头置换术两种方法均可以取得很好的肩关节功能恢复,而肱骨头置换术在围手术期的优势更为明显。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of open reduction and internal fixation versus humeral head replacement on postoperative recovery of shoulder joint function in a population of patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus.
MethodsThis study was a case-control study that retrospectively analyzed data from 80 patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus who underwent surgical treatment at the Department of Orthopedics at Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical method: the control group ( n = 45) received open reduction and internal fixation, while the observation group ( n = 35) underwent humeral head replacement. Surgery-related indexes, as well as therapeutic effect ratings, shoulder joint mobility, and shoulder joint function 3 months post-surgery, were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the incidence of complications occurring during the treatment was also compared between the two groups.
ResultsIn the observation group, the intraoperative blood loss, surgery duration, postoperative drainage amount, and length of hospital stay were (186.92 ± 28.04) mL, (68.89 ± 10.12) minutes, (57.89 ± 11.25) mL, and (10.18 ± 2.41) days, respectively, all of which were significantly lower than those in the control group, which were (218.23 ± 35.57) mL, (98.26 ± 15.34) minutes, (73.65 ± 13.68) mL, and (12.35 ± 2.92) days ( t = 4.27, 9.78, 5.51, 3.55, all P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the therapeutic effect between the two groups 3 months post-surgery [97.14% (34/35) vs. 95.56% (43/45), χ 2 = 0.04, P > 0.05]. At 3 months post-surgery, the angles of forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation in the observation group were (95.42 ± 7.88)°, (61.37 ± 6.56)°, and (74.38 ± 5.01)°, respectively, while in the control group they were (93.68 ± 7.75)°, (60.42 ± 6.87)°, and (73.75 ± 4.92)°, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant between the two groups ( t = -0.98, -0.62, -0.56, all P > 0.05). At 3 months post-surgery, the shoulder function score in the observation group was (73.46 ± 9.15), which was not significantly different from that in the control group [(71.75 ± 8.66), t = -0.85, P > 0.05]. The incidence of complications in the observation group was 2.86% (1/35), which was significantly lower than that in the control group [22.22% (10/45), χ 2 = 4.70, P = 0.030).
ConclusionsFor patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus, both open reduction and internal fixation and humeral head replacement can achieve good shoulder joint function recovery. However, humeral head replacement is more advantageous than open reduction and internal fixation during the perioperative period.
吕文强,王涛. 切开复位内固定与肱骨头置换术对于肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者肩关节功能恢复的疗效比较[J]. 中国基层医药,2025,32(03):414-419.
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240628-00826版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
除非特别声明,本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编委会的观点。
吕文强:酝酿和设计实验,采集数据,起草文章等;王涛:分析/解释数据,统计分析,采集数据,对文章的知识性内容作批评性审阅等

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。