论著
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
切开复位内固定与肱骨头置换术对于肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者肩关节功能恢复的疗效比较
吕文强
王涛
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240628-00826
Efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation versus humeral head replacement in the recovery of shoulder joint function in patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus
Lyu Wenqiang
Wang Tao
Authors Info & Affiliations
Lyu Wenqiang
Department of Orthopedics, Xi 'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an 710075, Shaanxi Province, China
Wang Tao
Department of Orthopedics, Xi 'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an 710075, Shaanxi Province, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240628-00826
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的比较切开复位内固定与肱骨头置换术对于肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者肩关节功能恢复的疗效。

方法本研究为病例对照研究,选择2020年1月至2023年12月期间西安高新医院骨科接诊后采用手术治疗的肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者80例的数据实施回顾性分析。依据手术方法不同将患者分为两组:对照组( n=45)给予切开复位内固定治疗术,观察组( n=35)给予肱骨头置换术。比较两组患者的手术相关指标、术后3个月的治疗效果评级、肩关节活动度、肩关节功能状态、并发症发生率。

结果观察组术中失血量、手术时间、术后引流量、术后住院时间分别为(186.92±28.04)mL、(68.89±10.12)min、(57.89±11.25)mL、(10.18±2.41)d,均明显低于对照组的(218.23±35.57)mL、(98.26±15.34)min、(73.65±13.68)mL、(12.35±2.92)d,差异均有统计学意义( t=4.27、9.78、5.51、3.55,均 P < 0.05)。两组患者术后3个月的疗效差异无统计学意义[97.14%(34/35)比95.56%(43/45)]( χ 2=0.04, P > 0.05)。观察组患者在治疗后3个月的前屈上举、外旋、内旋的角度分别为(95.42±7.88)°,(61.37±6.56)°,(74.38±5.01)°,对照组分别为(93.68±7.75)°,(60.42±6.87)°,(73.75±4.92)°,差异均无统计学意义( t=-0.98、-0.62、-0.56,均 P > 0.05)。观察组在治疗后3个月的肩关节功能状态评分为(73.46±9.15)分,对照组为(71.75±8.66)分,差异无统计学意义( t=-0.85, P > 0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为2.86%(1/35),明显低于对照组的22.22%(10/45),差异有统计学意义( χ 2=4.70, P=0.030)。

结论针对肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者,切开复位内固定与肱骨头置换术两种方法均可以取得很好的肩关节功能恢复,而肱骨头置换术在围手术期的优势更为明显。

肱骨;骨折,粉碎性;骨折切开复位;骨折固定术,内;关节成形术,置换;肩关节;失血,手术;手术后并发症
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of open reduction and internal fixation versus humeral head replacement on postoperative recovery of shoulder joint function in a population of patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus.

MethodsThis study was a case-control study that retrospectively analyzed data from 80 patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus who underwent surgical treatment at the Department of Orthopedics at Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical method: the control group ( n = 45) received open reduction and internal fixation, while the observation group ( n = 35) underwent humeral head replacement. Surgery-related indexes, as well as therapeutic effect ratings, shoulder joint mobility, and shoulder joint function 3 months post-surgery, were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the incidence of complications occurring during the treatment was also compared between the two groups.

ResultsIn the observation group, the intraoperative blood loss, surgery duration, postoperative drainage amount, and length of hospital stay were (186.92 ± 28.04) mL, (68.89 ± 10.12) minutes, (57.89 ± 11.25) mL, and (10.18 ± 2.41) days, respectively, all of which were significantly lower than those in the control group, which were (218.23 ± 35.57) mL, (98.26 ± 15.34) minutes, (73.65 ± 13.68) mL, and (12.35 ± 2.92) days ( t = 4.27, 9.78, 5.51, 3.55, all P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the therapeutic effect between the two groups 3 months post-surgery [97.14% (34/35) vs. 95.56% (43/45), χ 2 = 0.04, P > 0.05]. At 3 months post-surgery, the angles of forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation in the observation group were (95.42 ± 7.88)°, (61.37 ± 6.56)°, and (74.38 ± 5.01)°, respectively, while in the control group they were (93.68 ± 7.75)°, (60.42 ± 6.87)°, and (73.75 ± 4.92)°, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant between the two groups ( t = -0.98, -0.62, -0.56, all P > 0.05). At 3 months post-surgery, the shoulder function score in the observation group was (73.46 ± 9.15), which was not significantly different from that in the control group [(71.75 ± 8.66), t = -0.85, P > 0.05]. The incidence of complications in the observation group was 2.86% (1/35), which was significantly lower than that in the control group [22.22% (10/45), χ 2 = 4.70, P = 0.030).

ConclusionsFor patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus, both open reduction and internal fixation and humeral head replacement can achieve good shoulder joint function recovery. However, humeral head replacement is more advantageous than open reduction and internal fixation during the perioperative period.

Humerus;Fractures, comminuted;Open fracture reduction;Fracture fixation,internal;Arthroplasty,replacement;Shoulder joint;Blood loss,surgical;Postoperative complications
Wang Tao, Email: mocdef.qabq5985843
引用本文

吕文强,王涛. 切开复位内固定与肱骨头置换术对于肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者肩关节功能恢复的疗效比较[J]. 中国基层医药,2025,32(03):414-419.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240628-00826

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
肱骨近端的骨折情况普遍,涉及的位置是肱骨大结节基底以上的区域,由于此处骨骼结构的特殊性,对于外力的承受力较弱,故骨折概率较高 1 , 2。这类骨折约占全身骨折总数的4%~5%;而在60岁以上的人群中,其发生率可高达70%,特别是对于65岁以上的老年人,其发病率仅次于髋部和桡骨远端骨折,成为这一年龄段常见的骨折类型 3 , 4。有研究显示,肱骨近端骨折的发病年龄有两个高峰,分别是30岁左右的青年人和60岁以上的老年人,其中老年人由于骨质疏松和低能量损伤的易感性,构成了主要的高风险群体 5 , 6。随着社会经济发展,人口老龄化趋势加速,加上交通事故增多以及暴力接触机会增加,预计在未来30年内,此类骨折的发病率可能会上升3倍以上 7。目前,老年肱骨近端骨折的处理方法多样,但缺乏统一的治疗标准,特别是对于Neer分型为Ⅲ型或Ⅳ型的复杂骨折 8 , 9 , 10 , 11。手术治疗包括内固定和人工肱骨头置换,其目标是稳定肩关节,促进早期功能锻炼和肩关节功能的恢复。然而,关于这两种手术方法的优缺点,目前还存在争议 8 , 9 , 10 , 11,需要更多数据来支持相关研究。本研究旨在比较切开复位内固定与肱骨头置换术治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折的疗效和肩关节功能恢复上的差异。现报告如下。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
赖草生,林鸿宽,周之平,. multiloc多维锁定肱骨髓内钉对肱骨近端骨折患者肩关节功能、抗内翻应力的影响[J]. 中国医药科学, 2020,10(24):211-213,221. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2020.24.059 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Lai CS , Lin HK , Zhou ZP ,et al. Effect of multiloc multi-dimensional locking humeral intramedullary nail on shoulder joint function and anti Varus stress in patients with proximal humeral fracture[J]. China Medicine and Pharmacy, 2020,10(24):211-213,221. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2020.24.059 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[2]
袁浩,程永刚,蔡执中. 肩袖修补术治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效与年龄、Neer分型的相关性分析[J]. 中国基层医药, 2024,31(5):668-674. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20231025-00333 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Yuan H , Cheng YG , Cai ZZ . Effectiveness of rotator cuff repair surgery in treating proximal humeral fractures and its association with patient age and Neer classification[J]. Chin J Prim Med Pharm, 2024,31(5):668-674. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20231025-00333 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[3]
周海,田雅峰,郑瑾萱,. 组合式外固定架治疗高危老年肱骨近端骨折患者术后凝血功能改变与年龄相关性分析[J]. 河北医药, 2024,46(3):335-339. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2024.03.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhou H , Tian YF , Zheng JX ,et al. Correlation of changes in coagulation function with the age of high-risk elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with a combined external fixator[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2024,46(3):335-339. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2024.03.003 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[4]
唐承杰,张挥武,刘晶晶,. 七味三七口服液联合新型可注射骨水泥螺钉对老年肱骨近端骨折患者的治疗效果分析[J]. 中国医药, 2023,18(1):99-102. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2023.01.023 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Tang CJ , Zhang HW , Liu JJ ,et al. Therapeutic effect of Qiwei Sanqi oral liquid combined with new injectable bone cement screws on elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures [J]. China Medicine, 2023,18(1):99-102. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2023.01.023 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[5]
詹恋胜,陈金武,徐显志. 3D打印技术辅助肩峰前外侧入路手术治疗Neer3、4型肱骨近端骨折的疗效[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023,27(6):6-11. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20230222 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhan LS , Chen JW , Xu XZ . Efficacy of 3D printing assisted anterolateral acromial approach in the treatment of Neer type 3,4 of proximal humeral fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023,27(6):6-11. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20230222 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[6]
李丛彬,唐博,肖海军. 自体髂骨植骨联合锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端骨折[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2023,26(2):214-217. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2023.02.018 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Li CB , Tang B , Xiao HJ . Autologous iliac bone graft combined with locking plate internal fixation for treatment of proximal humerus fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics, 2023,26(2):214-217. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2023.02.018 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[7]
赵焕融,马志华,马俊军,. 经三角肌入路与三角肌胸大肌间隙入路治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2023,16(11):1185-1189. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2023.11.16 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhao HR , Ma ZH , Ma JJ ,et al. Comparison of therapeutic effects between transdeltoid approach and deltoid-pectoralis major space approach in treatment of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine, 2023,16(11):1185-1189. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2023.11.16 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[8]
王星明,张良,白刚. 切开复位锁定加压钢板内固定与人工肱骨头置换治疗老年肱骨近端Neer3部分骨折的疗效分析[J]. 宁夏医科大学学报, 2018,40(7):806-809. DOI: 10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2018.07.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wang XM , Zhang L , Bai G . Effect of open reduction locking compression plate internal fixation and artificial humerus head replacement in the treatment of Neer3 partial fracture of proximal humerus in elderly patients[J]. Journal of Ningxia Medical University, 2018,40(7):806-809. DOI: 10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2018.07.014 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[9]
谢晓涛,周军杰,吕顺,. 老年肱骨近端骨折患者的锁定加压钢板内固定与人工肱骨头置换疗效对比分析[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2016,5(9):647-652. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2016.09.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Xie XT , Zhou JJ , Lyu S ,et al. Comparison of locking plate and hemiarthroplasty for three and four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint, 2016,5(9):647-652. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2016.09.002 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[10]
熊晨,衡立松,崔玉,. 钢板内固定与半肩关节置换治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折效果的meta分析[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2022,15(1):49-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2022.01.08 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Xiong C , Heng LS , Cui Y ,et al. Meta analysis of locking plate fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal Bone and Joint Surgery, 2022,15(1):49-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2022.01.08 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[11]
赵东华,杜云峰,王红星,. 半肩关节置换术与肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定对肱骨近端Ⅲ、Ⅳ型骨折患者的疗效[J]. 河南医学研究, 2022,31(4):677-680. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X.2022.04.028 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhao DH , Du YF , Wang HX ,et al. Effect of hemi-shoulder arthroplasty and locking proximal humeral plate internal fixation in patients with type Ⅲ and Ⅳ proximal humerus fractures[J]. Henan Medical Research, 2022,31(4):677-680. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X.2022.04.028 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[12]
李永伟,张强,梅青华. 肱骨近端内固定锁定系统治疗肱骨近端骨折的效果观察[J]. 临床医学工程, 2023,30(6):789-790. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2023.06.0789 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Li YW , Zhang Q , Mei QH . Observation on the Effect of Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System in the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures[J]. Clinical Medical & Engineering , 2023,30(6):789-790. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2023.06.0789 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[13]
田子睿,姚敏,王拥军,. 中文版Constant-Murley肩关节评分量表的研制与应用[J]. 中医正骨, 2019,31(5):20-21,25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6015.2019.05.005 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Tian ZR , Yao M , Wang YJ ,et al. Development and application of Chinese version of constant-murley shoulder scoring scale[J]. The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology, 2019,31(5):20-21,25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6015.2019.05.005 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[14]
范海平,程浩,陈岩召,. 两种术式在老年复杂性肱骨近端骨折患者中应用效果对比[J]. 中国医学创新, 2024,21(10):105-108. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2024.10.024 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Fan HP , Cheng H , Chen YZ ,et al. Comparison of the efficacy of the two operations in elderly patients with complex proximal humeral fractures[J]. Medical Innovation of China, 2024,21(10):105-108. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2024.10.024 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[15]
王文静,黎丁霜,马耿佳,. 骨六方联合正骨十四法小夹板外固定治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效观察[J]. 广州中医药大学学报, 2023,40(8):1942-1947. DOI: 10.13359/j.cnki.gzxbtcm.2023.08.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wang WJ , Li DS , Ma GJ ,et al. Observation on the therapeutic effect of No.6 orthopedics prescription combined with fourteen bone-setting manipulations and small-splint external fixation for the treatment of patients with proximal humeral fractures[J]. Journal of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023,40(8):1942-1947. DOI: 10.13359/j.cnki.gzxbtcm.2023.08.014 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[16]
赵晶晶,朱君涵,徐砜,. 锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效与年龄、Neer分型的相关性分析[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2022,37(12):1631-1634. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3697.2022.12.028 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhao JJ , Zhu JH , Xu F ,et al. Effect of locking plate in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture and the correlation with age and Neer type[J]. Journal of North Sichuan Medical College, 2022,37(12):1631-1634. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3697.2022.12.028 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[17]
白桓安,陆清达,刘趁心,. 不同固定方式治疗儿童肱骨近端骨折的有限元分析[J]. 医用生物力学, 2023,38(2):297-302,323. DOI: 10.16156/j.1004-7220.2023.02.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Bai HA , Lu QD , Liu CX ,et al. Finite element analysis on different internal fixations for treating proximal humeral fractures in children[J]. Journal of Medical Biomechanics, 2023,38(2):297-302,323. DOI: 10.16156/j.1004-7220.2023.02.014 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[18]
杨华,吕志华,雷礼琴,. 人工肱骨头置换术与切开复位内固定术治疗老年肱骨近端骨折患者的临床疗效[J]. 医疗装备, 2021,34(17):84,87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2021.17.038 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Yang H , Lyu ZH , Lei LQ ,et al. Clinical effect of artificial humerus head replacement and open reduction internal fixation in the treatment of elderly patients with proximal humerus fracture[J]. Medical Equipment, 2021,34(17):84,87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2021.17.038 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[19]
张晓东. 人工半肩关节置换术治疗复杂性肱骨近端骨折患者的效果[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2021,29(24):49-50. DOI: 10.13214/j.cnki.cjotadm.2021.24.028 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhang XD . Effect of artificial half-shoulder joint replacement in the treatment of complicated proximal humeral fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine, 2021,29(24):49-50. DOI: 10.13214/j.cnki.cjotadm.2021.24.028 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[20]
杨波,何苗. 切开复位内固定术与人工肱骨头置换术治疗肱骨近端骨折的效果及安全性分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2021,16(23):78-81. DOI: 10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2021.23.025 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Yang B , He M . Effect and safety analysis of open reduction and internal fixation and artificial humeral head replacement in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures[J]. China Practical Medical, 2021,16(23):78-81. DOI: 10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2021.23.025 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[21]
解金三,陈锋. 人工肱骨头置换术与微创锁定加压钢板内固定治疗对老年肱骨近端骨折患者临床疗效、疼痛及肩关节功能的影响[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2020,17(6):87-90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2020.06.026 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Xie JS , Chen F . The effects of humeral head replacement and internal fixation of minimally invasive locking compression plate on the clinical efficacy,pain and shoulder function of elderly patients with fractures of proximal humerus[J]. Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2020,17(6):87-90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2020.06.026 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
备注信息
A
王涛,Email: mocdef.qabq5985843
B

吕文强:酝酿和设计实验,采集数据,起草文章等;王涛:分析/解释数据,统计分析,采集数据,对文章的知识性内容作批评性审阅等

C
吕文强, 王涛. 切开复位内固定与肱骨头置换术对于肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者肩关节功能恢复的疗效比较[J]. 中国基层医药,2025,32(3):414-419. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20240628-00826.
D
所有作者声明不存在利益冲突
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号