急性中毒
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
敌草快混合百草枯中毒患者急性肾损伤的临床特点及危险因素分析
桂久玖
李柯
叶健萍
丁溢姣
唐虎
唐亚慧
吴斌
卢中秋
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2025.03.011
Clinical characteristics and risk factors analysis of acute kidney injury in patients with diquat mixed with paraquat poisoning
Gui Jiujiu
Li Ke
Ye Jianping
Ding Yijiao
Tang Hu
Tang Yahui
Wu Bin
Lu Zhongqiu
Authors Info & Affiliations
Gui Jiujiu
Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Emergency Critical Disease and Rescue Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China
Li Ke
Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Emergency Critical Disease and Rescue Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China
Ye Jianping
Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Emergency Critical Disease and Rescue Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China
Ding Yijiao
Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Emergency Critical Disease and Rescue Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China
Tang Hu
Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Emergency Critical Disease and Rescue Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China
Tang Yahui
Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Emergency Critical Disease and Rescue Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China
Wu Bin
Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Emergency Critical Disease and Rescue Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China
Lu Zhongqiu
Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Institute of Emergency Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Emergency Critical Disease and Rescue Medicine, Wenzhou 325000, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2025.03.011
3
2
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨敌草快(diquat, DQ)混合百草枯(paraquat, PQ)中毒患者急性肾损伤(acute kidney injury, AKI)的临床特点并分析其危险因素。

方法回顾性分析2016年1月20日至2024年6月10日本院急诊科收治的210例PQ、DQ以及混合中毒患者的临床资料。根据毒物检测结果,将患者分为PQ组、DQ组和混合中毒组,对比三组的临床指标、AKI发生率及严重程度。将混合中毒患者按院内是否发生AKI分为AKI组和非AKI组,比较两组各项指标的差异。采用单因素Logistic分析及最小绝对收敛和选择算子(least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, Lasso)回归法筛选危险因素,多因素Logistic回归建立模型,绘制受试者操作特征(receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC)曲线,分析混合中毒患者发生AKI的影响因素,并评估其预测价值。

结果共纳入PQ组88例,DQ组28例,混合中毒组57例。三组在年龄、死亡人数、服毒量、身体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、AKI发生率、脏器支持治疗率、入院全身炎症反应综合征评分(systemic inflammatory response syndrome score, SIRS评分)、入院急性生理及慢性健康评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ评分)、入院中毒严重度评分(PSS评分)等方面差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。三组均发生不同程度的AKI,其中混合中毒患者AKI发生率更高且病情更重。混合中毒患者中AKI组与非AKI组相比,AKI组在年龄、病死率、服毒量、入院SIRS评分、APACHEⅡ评分、PSS评分、入院血浆PQ浓度、入院血浆DQ浓度、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、单核细胞计数、血肌酐、降钙素原、C反应蛋白、丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶、血乳酸和胱抑素C方面均显著升高( P<0.05),而肾小球滤过率估算值(estimated glomerural filtration rate, eGFR)和二氧化碳分压显著降低( P<0.05)。混合中毒患者中,AKI组服毒后不同时间点的血肌酐值均高于非AKI组( P<0.05),且呈上升趋势,服毒后第五天达到峰值(212.19±101.67)μmol/L。Lasso-Logistic回归模型结果显示,年龄、服毒量、入院SIRS评分、APACHE Ⅱ评分、白细胞计数、单核细胞计数、二氧化碳分压为混合中毒患者发生AKI的危险因素,其中服毒量和入院SIRS评分是混合中毒患者发生AKI的独立危险因素,两者联合预测混合中毒患者发生AKI的ROC曲线下面积为0.991(95% CI:0.976~1.000),敏感度为0.940,特异度为1.000。

结论敌草快混合百草枯中毒相比PQ或DQ单纯中毒更容易发生AKI且病死率更高,服毒量和入院SIRS评分是混合中毒患者发生AKI的独立危险因素,两者联合检测对混合中毒后AKI的发生具有较高的预测价值。

敌草快;百草枯;混合中毒;急性肾损伤;临床特点;危险因素
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo explore the clinical characteristics and risk factors of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with diquat mixed with paraquat poisoning.

MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 210 patients admitted to the department of emergency at our hospital with paraquat, diquat or mixed poisoning from January 20, 2016, to June 10, 2024. Based on the detection results of plasma toxicants, patients were categorized into three groups: the paraquat group (PQ group), and the diquat group (DQ group), the diquat-paraquat mixed group (mixed group). We compared clinical indices, occurrence, and severity of AKI among these groups. In the mixed group, patients were further divided into AKI and non-AKI subgroups based on the presence of AKI during hospitalization, and differences in clinical indices between these subgroups were analyzed. Univariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regressions were used to screen risk factors, and multivariate logistic regression was applied to establish the model. ROC curves were generated, and factors influencing AKI occurrence in the mixed group were identified.

ResultsA total of 88 patients were included in the PQ group, 28 in the DQ group, and 57 in the mixed group. Significant differences were observed among the three groups in terms of age, mortality rate, ingestion amount, body mass index(BMI), occurrence of AKI, the incidence of organ support therapy, SIRS score, PSS score, and APACHE Ⅱ score on admission ( P < 0.05). All three groups exhibited various degrees of AKI, with the mixed group showing a higher proportion and more severe conditions. In the mixed group, compared with the non-AKI group, the AKI group showed significantly higher values for age, number of deaths, ingestion amount, SIRS score, PSS score, APACHE Ⅱ score, plasma PQ concentration on admission, plasma DQ concentration on admission, white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (NEUT), monocyte count (MONO), serum creatinine (SCr), procalcitonin (PCT), c-reactive protein (CRP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood lactic acid (Lac), and cystatin C (CysC) ( P < 0.05). Conversely, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) were significantly lower in the AKI group ( P < 0.05). Additionally, in the mixed group, SCr levels at various times post-poisoning were significantly higher compared with the non-AKI group ( P < 0.05), showing an increasing trend and peaking at 212.19 ± 101.67 μmol/L on the fifth day after poisoning. Age, ingestion amount, SIRS score on admission, WBC, MONO, and PCO 2 were extracted by Lasso-Logistic regression. Multivariate logistic regression identified ingestion amount and SIRS score on admission as the independent risk factors for the occurrence of AKI in the mixed group. The area under the ROC curve for ingestion amount and SIRS score on admission was 0.991 (95% CI: 0.976-1.000), the sensitivity was 0.940 and the specificity was 1.000.

ConclusionsThe diquat mixed with paraquat poisoning is associated with a higher incidence and greater severity of AKI compared with poisoning with either PQ or DQ alone. Additionally, ingestion amount and SIRS score on admission have been identified as independent risk factors for the occurrence of AKI in patients with the mixed poisoning. The combined assessment of these two factors improves AKI prediction in patients with the mixed poisoning.

Diquat;Paraquat;Mixed poisoning;Acute kidney injury;Clinical characteristics;Risk factors
Lu Zhongqiu, Email: mocdef.3ab61518046qzl
引用本文

桂久玖,李柯,叶健萍,等. 敌草快混合百草枯中毒患者急性肾损伤的临床特点及危险因素分析[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志,2025,34(03):350-358.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2025.03.011

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
联吡啶类除草剂主要包括百草枯(paraquat,PQ)和敌草快(diquat,DQ),均为常见的农药种类,具有缺乏特效解毒药且病死率高的特点。自2016年7月1日国内禁止百草枯水剂销售和使用起 [ 1 ],敌草快逐渐占据市场,相关中毒病例数也逐年增加,并常在中毒患者体内检测到两种毒物同时存在。通过前期研究发现,相较于单类中毒,DQ混合PQ中毒患者往往病情更重、预后更差 [ 2 ]。PQ和DQ主要通过肾脏排泄 [ 3 , 4 ],具有显著肾毒性,而急性肾损伤(acute kidney injury,AKI)是联吡啶类除草剂中毒常见且严重的并发症,与患者预后紧密相关,所以早期识别、诊断和治疗AKI至关重要。目前关于PQ、DQ以及混合中毒相关AKI的临床研究较为有限,本研究回顾性分析相关中毒患者临床资料,总结归纳混合中毒患者发生AKI相关临床特点、预后情况及危险因素,为早期干预和治疗决策提供临床依据。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
申桂英. 2016年7月1日起百草枯水剂在中国禁用[J]. 精细与专用化学品, 2016,24(7):47. DOI: 10.19482/j.cn11-3237.2016.07.012 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
陈潇荣,杜潇瀛,叶欢乐,. 敌草 快混合百草枯中毒患者临床特点分析 [J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2023,32(2):203-209. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2023.02.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
孟娜,孙艺青,董艳玲,. 敌草快的人体毒代动力学及血液灌流疗效评估[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2020,29(11):1403-1410. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2020.11.005 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Wang XZ , Wang XM , Zhu YY ,et al. ADME/T-based strategies for paraquat detoxification: Transporters and enzymes[J]. Environ Pollut, 2021,291:118137. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118137 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Levey AS , Stevens LA , Schmid CH ,et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2009,150(9):604-612. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Khwaja A . KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury[J]. Nephron Clin Pract, 2012,120(4):c179-c184. DOI: 10.1159/000339789 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
中国医师协会急诊医师分会. 急性百草枯中毒诊治专家共识(2022)[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2022,31(11):1435-1444. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2022.11.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
急性敌草快中毒诊断与治疗专家共识组. 急性敌草快中毒诊断与治疗专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2020,29(10):1282-1289. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2020.10.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Yang L , Xing GL , Wang L ,et al. Acute kidney injury in China: a cross-sectional survey[J]. Lancet, 2015,386(10002):1465-1471. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00344-X .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
杨理健. 当前要重视百草枯水剂换成敌草快销售使用[J]. 农业知识, 2016(28):1, 4.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
高艳霞,王艺博,李毅,. 急性百草枯中毒导致多器官损伤的临床观察[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2020,29(11):1411-1416. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2020.11.006 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
孟娜,孙艺青,刘亮,. 急性敌草快中毒86例临床分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2022,34(3):301-305. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220128-00105 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
杨莹,蒋臻,唐郭,. 百草枯中毒患者急性肾损伤风险预测[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2023,32(3):332-338. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2023.03.010 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Meng N , Sun Y , Dong Y ,et al. Prognostic value of plasma diquat concentration in patients with acute oral diquat poisoning: a retrospective study[J]. Front Public Health, 2024,12:1333450. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1333450 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Gu SY , Yeh TY , Lin SY ,et al. Unfractionated bone marrow cells attenuate paraquat-induced glomerular injury and acute renal failure by modulating the inflammatory response[J]. Sci Rep, 2016,6:23287. DOI: 10.1038/srep23287 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Hu X , Chen LH , Li TG ,et al. TLR3 is involved in paraquat-induced acute renal injury[J]. Life Sci, 2019,223:102-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.03.029 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Magalhães N , Carvalho F , Dinis-Oliveira RJ . Human and experimental toxicology of diquat poisoning: Toxicokinetics, mechanisms of toxicity, clinical features, and treatment[J]. Hum Exp Toxicol, 2018,37(11):1131-1160. DOI: 10.1177/0960327118765330 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
张华忠,孙昊,陈旭锋,. 敌草快中毒致急性肾损伤肾活检2例报道[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2022,31(8):1121-1123. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2022.08.018 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Zhou JN , Lu YQ . Lethal diquat poisoning manifests as acute central nervous system injury and circulatory failure: a retrospective cohort study of 50 cases[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2022,52:101609. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101609 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Song YX , Fan SL , Peng A ,et al. A retrospective analysis reveals a predictor of survival for the patient with paraquat intoxication[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2020,511:269-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.027 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
阚宝甜, 刘会 ,菅向东,. 急性百草枯中毒肾损伤指标动态变化的临床研究[J]. 中华劳动卫生职业病杂志, 2012,30(11):839-841. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2012.11.009 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Mohamed F , Endre Z , Jayamanne S ,et al. Mechanisms underlying early rapid increases in creatinine in paraquat poisoning[J]. PLoS One, 2015,10(3):e0122357. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122357 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Zheng Q , Zhao H , Jia D ,et al. Overexpression of TOLLIP protects against acute kidney injury after paraquat intoxication through inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation modulated by toll-like receptor 2/4 signaling[J]. Mediators Inflamm, 2021,2021:5571272. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5571272 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Zhang HZ , Zhang JS , Li JQ ,et al. Multi-omics analyses reveal the mechanisms of early stage kidney toxicity by diquat[J]. Toxics, 2023,11(2):184. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11020184 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
王韫文,赵敏. 71例急性敌草快中毒患者死亡危险因素分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2022,51(3):203-208. DOI: 10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2022.03.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
卢中秋,Email: mocdef.3ab61518046qzl
B

桂久玖:文章撰写、整理和提交;李柯、叶健萍、丁溢姣、唐虎:数据整理、统计分析;唐亚慧、吴斌:病例的收集和汇总;卢中秋:研究指导、论文修改、经费支持

C
所有作者声明无利益冲突
D
国家自然科学基金项目 (82302482)
国家中医药管理局-浙江省中医药管理局共建科技计划项目 (GZY-ZJ-KJ-23031)
温州市科技局重大科技创新攻关项目 (ZY2022023)
浙江省临床重点专科急诊医学科
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号