临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
初始复苏时不同通气方式对院内心脏骤停患者短期预后的影响
陈植炜
官运杰
张舒娇
吕慧洪
林志鸿
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2025.03.015
The impact of different ventilation modalities during initial resuscitation on short-term outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest
Chen Zhiwei
Guan Yunjie
Zhang Shujiao
Lyu Huihong
Lin Zhihong
Authors Info & Affiliations
Chen Zhiwei
Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, China
Department of Emergency, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350212, China
Guan Yunjie
Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, China
Zhang Shujiao
Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, China
Lyu Huihong
Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, China
Lin Zhihong
Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, China
Department of Emergency, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350212, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2025.03.015
7
2
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的研究初始复苏时不同通气方式对成人院内心脏骤停(in-hospital cardiac arrest, IHCA)患者短期预后的影响。

方法回顾性纳入福建医科大学附属第一医院2019年9月至2021年12月所有住院及入住急诊抢救室、观察室且年龄≥18岁成人患者,记录期间所有发生IHCA且复苏期间均接受气道管理的患者的一般资料、基础疾病及短期预后等指标。根据复苏时接受的通气方式分为非高级气道组和高级气道组。主要结局为自主循环恢复(return of spontaneous circulation, ROSC)≥20 min,次要结局为出院存活及出院存活良好神经功能。Logistic回归分析不同通气方式对成人IHCA患者短期预后的影响,并构建成人IHCA患者ROSC的预测模型,用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)评估模型的预测效能。

结果最终纳入285例成人IHCA患者。其中非高级气道组75例,高级气道组210例。所有患者中,ROSC≥20 min的127例,出院存活51例,出院存活良好神经功能35例。Logistic回归分析显示通气方式、肾上腺素使用剂量,骤停地点是影响成人IHCA患者ROSC的独立危险因素;与非高级气道相比,高级气道管理与ROSC率更高相关( OR=3.698,95% CI: 1.844~7.419, P<0.001),但不同通气方式对成人IHCA患者出院存活( OR=1.097,95% CI: 0.506~2.376, P=0.815)及出院存活良好神经功能( OR=0.548,95% CI: 0.224~1.339, P=0.187)的影响差异无统计学意义。将通气方式、肾上腺素使用剂量,骤停地点作为预测变量代入多因素Logistic回归模型中构建成人IHCA患者ROSC的预测模型,绘制受试者操作特性(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线,得出模型AUC值0.735 ( 0.678~0.793)。亚组分析显示,早期高级气道管理能提高非心源性心脏骤停患者ROSC率,但不能改善心源性心脏骤停患者ROSC率,且与患者更低的出院存活及更差的出院存活神经功能相关。

结论与非高级气道相比,复苏时高级气道管理可提高成人IHCA患者ROSC率,但并不能改善患者出院存活及出院存活良好神经功能。通气方式、肾上腺素使用剂量,骤停地点是影响成人IHCA患者ROSC的独立危险因素,以上述指标构建成人IHCA患者ROSC的预测模型具有中度的预测能力。

院内心脏骤停;心肺复苏;气道管理;气管插管;预测模型
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of different ventilation modalities during initial resuscitation on short-term outcomes in adult patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).

MethodsThis retrospective study included adult patients (age ≥18 years) admitted to the emergency resuscitation or observation units of our hospital from September 2019 to December 2021. Demographic data, comorbidities, and short-term outcomes of IHCA patients who underwent airway management during resuscitation were recorded. Participants were stratified into non-advanced airway and advanced airway groups based on ventilation modality. The primary outcome was defined as sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) ≥20 min, and secondary outcomes included survival to discharge and favorable neurological status at discharge. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of different ventilation modalities on short-term outcomes among adult IHCA patients. and developed a prediction model of ROSC for adult IHCA patients, and its predictive performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic.

ResultsAmong 285 IHCA patients (non-advanced airway: n=75; advanced airway: n=210), 127 achieved ROSC ≥20 min, 51 survived to discharge, and 35 had favorable neurological outcomes. Logistic regression identified ventilation modality, epinephrine dose, and arrest location as independent predictors of ROSC in adult IHCA patients. Advanced airway management demonstrated significantly higher ROSC rates compared to non-advanced interventions ( OR=3.698, 95% CI:1.844-7.419, P<0.001). However, no significant associations were observed between ventilation modalities and survival to discharge ( OR=1.097, 95% CI:0.506-2.376, P=0.815) or favorable neurological outcomes at discharge ( OR=0.548, 95% CI:0.224-1.339, P=0.187). Ventilation modality, epinephrine dose, and arrest location were incorporated as predictors in a multivariable logistic regression model to develop a ROSC prediction model for adult IHCA patients. The discriminative ability of model was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, yielding an AUC of 0.735 (95% CI:0.678-0.793). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that early advanced airway management significantly enhanced ROSC rates in noncardiac etiology cases, whereas no such benefit was observed in cardiac etiology cases, while this intervention correlated with decreased survival to discharge rates and deteriorated neurological outcomes among survivors.

ConclusionsAdvanced airway management demonstrated improved ROSC rates in adult IHCA cases, while showing no significant improvement in survival rates or favorable neurological outcomes at discharge. Ventilation modality, epinephrine dose, and arrest location are independent predictors of ROSC. A model integrating these factors exhibits moderate predictive utility for IHCA outcomes.

In-hospital cardiac arrest;Cardiopulmonary resuscitation;Airway management;Tracheal intubation;Predictive model.
Lin Zhihong, Email: mocdef.3ab61hznilzf
引用本文

陈植炜,官运杰,张舒娇,等. 初始复苏时不同通气方式对院内心脏骤停患者短期预后的影响[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志,2025,34(03):382-388.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2025.03.015

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
心脏骤停(cardiac arrest, CA)致残致死率高,已成为全球重大公共卫生问题之一。虽然我国急救医疗体系已经取得了十足的进步,CA患者的复苏成功率较前提高,但复苏后存活率及达到良好神经功能预后比例未见明显改善 [ 1 ]。《中国心脏骤停与心肺复苏报告(2022年版)概要》指出,中国七大地理区域成人院内心脏骤停(in-hospital cardiac arrest, IHCA)发病率为8.4%,存活出院率为9.4%,神经功能预后良好率为6.7% [ 2 ]。因此高质量的心肺复苏(cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR)对患者的生存至关重要 [ 3 ],而气道管理作为CPR过程中的重要组成部分,选择合适的通气方式可显著影响患者预后。心肺复苏早期主要的通气方式包括口对口,口-面罩,球囊-面罩,口咽通气管,声门上气道(supraglottic airway, SGA),包括喉罩、喉管,气管插管(endotracheal intubation, ETI)等。其中口-面罩,球囊-面罩,口咽通气管等统称为基础气道,声门上气道(喉罩、喉管)及气管插管等统称为高级气道。目前IHCA患者CPR过程中的最佳通气方式及其管理的时机仍然存在争议。
目前对IHCA患者气道管理的经验大多是由院外心脏骤停(out-hospital cardiac arrest, OHCA)患者气道管理的研究结论中推断而来 [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]。然而,IHCA患者骤停的特征和处理方式与OHCA患者并不完全相同 [ 7 ],目前尚不清楚这些在OHCA患者中的研究结果是否可以应用于IHCA期间的气道管理,因此有必要进一步探究IHCA患者最佳的通气方式及管理时机。本研究试图探索初始复苏时,非高级气道与高级气道两种不同的通气方式对IHCA患者短期预后的影响。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
兰超,张强,雷如意,. 心脏骤停救治现状及2023年研究热点[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2024,33(1):6-10. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2024.01.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
中国心脏骤停与心肺复苏报告编写组,徐峰,陈玉国. 中国心脏骤停与心肺复苏报告(2022年版)概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2023,38(10):1005-1017. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2023.10.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Wik L . Rediscovering the importance of chest compressions to improve the outcome from cardiac arrest[J]. Resuscitation, 2003,58(3):267-269. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00267-3 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Merchant RM , Topjian AA , Panchal AR ,et al. Part 1: executive summary: 2020 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J]. Circulation, 2020,142(16_suppl_2):S366-S468. DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000918 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Nolan JP , Sandroni C , Böttiger BW ,et al. European resuscitation council and European society of intensive care medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2021,47(4):369-421. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06368-4 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Soar J , Böttiger BW , Carli P ,et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: adult advanced life support[J]. Resuscitation, 2021,161:115-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Andersson A , Arctaedius I , Cronberg T ,et al. In-hospital versus out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: characteristics and outcomes in patien ts admitted to intensive care after return of spontaneous circulation [J]. Resuscitation, 2022,176:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.04.023 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Jennett B , Bond M . Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage[J]. Lancet, 1975,1(7905):480-484. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92830-5 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Perkins GD , Travers AH , Berg RA ,et al. Part 3: adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations[J]. Resuscitation, 2015,95:e43-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.041 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Berdowski J , Berg RA , Tijssen JGP ,et al. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies[J]. Resuscitation, 2010,81(11):1479-1487. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.006 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Virani SS , Alonso A , Aparicio HJ ,et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: a report from the American heart association[J]. Circulation, 2021,143(8):e254-e743. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Thompson LE , Chan PS , Tang FM ,et al. Long-term survival trends of medicare patients after in-hospital cardiac arrest: insights from get with the guidelines-resuscitation®[J]. Resuscitation, 2018,123:58-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.10.023 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Kumar G , Nanchal R . Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013,368(7):680. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1215155 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Kleinman ME , Brennan EE , Goldberger ZD ,et al. Part 5: adult basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J]. Circulation, 2015,132(18):Suppl 2-S414. S435DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
宏欣,裴红红. 心脏骤停的多途径防治[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2025,34(1):12-16. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2025.01.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Jabre P , Penaloza A , Pinero D ,et al. Effect of bag-mask ventilation vs endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest: a randomized clinical t rial [J]. JAMA, 2018,319(8):779-787. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.0156 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Andersen LW , Granfeldt A , Callaway CW ,et al. Association between tracheal intubation during adult in-hospital cardiac arrest and survival[J]. JAMA, 2017,317(5):494-506. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.20165 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Weisfeldt ML , Becker LB . Resuscitation after cardiac arrest: a 3-phase time-sensitive model[J]. JAMA, 2002,288(23):3035-3038. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.23.3035 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Chan PS , Krumholz HM , Nichol G ,et al. Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008,358(1):9-17. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa0706467 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Donnino MW , Salciccioli JD , Howell MD ,et al. Time to administration of epinephrine and outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest with non-shockable rhythms: retrospective analysis of large in-hospital data registry[J]. BMJ, 2014,348:g3028. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g3028 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Souchtchenko SS , Benner JP , Allen JL ,et al. A review of chest compression interruptions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and strategies for the future[J]. J Emerg Med, 2013,45(3):458-466. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.01.023 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Hope Kilgannon J , Jones AE , Shapiro NI ,et al. Association between arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest and in-hospital mortality[J]. JAMA, 2010,303(21):2165-2171. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.707 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Bradley SM , Zhou YS , Ramachandran SK ,et al. Retrospective cohort study of hospital variation in airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest and the association with patient survival: insights from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation[J]. Crit Care, 2019,23(1):158. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2426-5 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
林志鸿,Email: mocdef.3ab61hznilzf
B

陈植炜:研究设计、论文撰写及修改;官运杰:数据收集;张舒娇:统计学分析及文献支持;吕慧洪:数据整理;林志鸿:研究设计、论文审阅、指导及修改

C
所有作者声明无利益冲突
D
福建省科技厅引导性项目 (2021Y0014)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号