胸部损伤
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
全胸腔镜下腔镜接骨板内固定与剖胸接骨板内固定治疗多发肋骨骨折的疗效比较
毕磊
晨正宇
邓意平
艾成
杨富瑜
吕忠柱
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20241019-00611
Comparative efficacy of internal fixation with video thoracoscopy-assisted rib plating and open thoracotomy in the treatment of multiple rib fracture
Bi Lei
Chen Zhengyu
Deng Yiping
Ai Cheng
Yang Fuyu
Lyu Zhongzhu
Authors Info & Affiliations
Bi Lei
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 402760, China
Chen Zhengyu
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 402760, China
Deng Yiping
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 402760, China
Ai Cheng
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 402760, China
Yang Fuyu
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 402760, China
Lyu Zhongzhu
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 402760, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20241019-00611
2
1
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的比较全胸腔镜下腔镜接骨板内固定与剖胸接骨板内固定治疗多发肋骨骨折的疗效。

方法采用回顾性队列研究分析2021年5月至2023年5月重庆医科大学附属璧山医院收治的65例多发肋骨骨折患者的临床资料,其中男42例,女23例;年龄19~75岁[(51.6±7.0)岁]。33例行全胸腔镜下腔镜接骨板内固定(胸腔镜组),32例行剖胸接骨板内固定治疗(剖胸组)。比较2组手术切口长度、术中出血量、手术时长、术后胸腔闭式引流管带管时长、术后胸腔引流量、住院时长;术后6、12、24、48、72 h视觉模拟评分(VAS);术前,术后7 d、6个月及末次随访时用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)及最大呼气峰流速(PEF);术后6个月及末次随访时骨折愈合优良率;术后并发症发生率。

结果患者均获随访12~24个月[(15.2±2.2)个月]。胸腔镜组手术切口长度为(4.3±1.5)cm,术中出血量为(65.2±15.0)ml,手术时长为(68.8±13.1)min,均短于或少于剖胸组的(7.2±1.7)cm、(93.3±16.3)ml、(93.7±15.9)min( P<0.01)。胸腔镜组术后带管时长为(3.8±1.5)d,术后胸腔引流量为(357.3±38.6)ml,住院时长为(12.3±1.7)d,均少于或短于剖胸组的(5.9±1.8)d、(424.9±45.4)ml、(18.6±2.5)d( P<0.01)。术后6、12、24、48 h,胸腔镜组VAS分别为(5.1±1.6)分、(4.7±1.5)分、(4.2±1.5)分、(3.9±1.3)分,均低于剖胸组的(8.4±1.8)分、(7.3±1.5)分、(6.3±1.3)分、(5.2±1.2)分( P<0.01);2组术后72 h VAS差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。术前、术后6个月及末次随访时,2组FVC、FEV1和PEF差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05);术后7 d,胸腔镜组FVC为(4.17±0.25)L,FEV1为(2.24±0.24)L,PEF为(5.53±0.50)L/s,均高于剖胸组的(4.01±0.23)L、(2.12±0.21)L、(5.23±0.42)L/s( P<0.05)。术后6个月,胸腔镜组骨折愈合优良率为94%(31/33),剖胸组骨折愈合优良率为97%(31/32)( P>0.05);末次随访时,2组骨折愈合优良率均为100%( P>0.05)。胸腔镜组并发症发生率为15%(5/33),低于剖胸组的41%(13/32)( P<0.05)。

结论与剖胸接骨板内固定相比,全胸腔镜下腔镜接骨板内固定治疗多发肋骨骨折具有手术创伤小、术后早期疼痛减轻且肺功能恢复快、并发症少等优点。

胸部损伤;肋骨骨折;胸腔镜检查;骨折固定术,内
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of internal fixation with video thoracoscopy-assisted rib plating and open thoracotomy in the treatment of multiple rib fracture.

MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 65 patients with multiple rib fracture who were admitted to Affiliated Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between May 2021 and May 2023, including 42 males and 23 females, aged 19-75 years [(51.6±7.0)years]. Of all, 33 patients were treated with internal fixation with video thoracoscopy-assisted rib plating (thoracoscopy group), while other 32 patients treated with internal fixation with open thoracotomy (thoracotomy group). Two groups were compared in terms of surgical incision length, intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, duration of postoperative drainage tube placement, postoperative chest tube drainage, and length of hospital stay. Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were detected preoperatively, at 7 days, 6 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up. The excellent and good rate of fracture healing was evaluated at 6 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up. The incidence of postoperative complications was also assessed.

ResultsAll the patients were followed up for 12-24 months [(15.2±2.2)months]. The surgical incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and surgical duration were (4.3±1.5)cm, (65.2±15.0)ml, and (68.8±13.1)minutes in the thoracoscopy group, shorter or less than (7.2±1.7)cm, (93.3±16.3)ml, and (93.7±15.9)minutes in the thoracotomy group ( P<0.01). The duration of drainage tube placement, postoperative chest tube drainage volume and length of hospital stay were (3.8±1.5)days, (357.3±38.6)ml and (12.3±1.7)days in the thoracoscopy group, shorter or less than (5.9±1.8)days, (424.9±45.4)ml, and (18.6±2.5)days in the thoracotomy group ( P<0.01). At 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, the VAS scores in the thoracoscopy group were (5.1±1.6)points, (4.7±1.5)points, (4.2±1.5)points, and (3.9±1.3)points, significantly lower than those in the thoracotomy group [(8.4±1.8)points, (7.3±1.5)points, (6.3±1.3)points, and (5.2±1.2)points] ( P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the VAS scores between the two groups at 72 hours postoperatively ( P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in FVC, FEV1 and PEF between the two groups preoperatively, at 6 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). At 7 days postoperatively, FVC, FEV1 and PEF were (4.17±0.25)L, (2.24±0.24)L, and (5.53±0.50)L/s in the thoracoscopy group, significantly higher than those in the thoracotomy group [(4.01±0.23)L, (2.12±0.21)L, and (5.23±0.42)L/s] ( P<0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, the excellent and good rate was 94% (31/33) in the thoracoscopy group and 97% (31/32) in the thoracotomy group ( P>0.05). At the last follow-up, the excellent and good rate in both groups were 100% ( P>0.05). The incidence of complications was 15% (5/33) in the thoracoscopy group, lower than 41% (13/32) in the thoracotomy group ( P<0.05).

ConclusionCompared with internal fixation with open thoracotomy in the treatment of multiple rib fracture, the internal fixation with video thoracoscopy-assisted rib plating has the advantages of less surgical trauma, milder pain at the early stage after surgery, earlier postoperative recovery of pulmonary function and fewer complications.

Thoracic injuries;Rib fractures;Thoracoscopy;Fracture fixation, internal
Lyu Zhongzhu, Email: mocdef.aabnisuhzgnohzvl
引用本文

毕磊,晨正宇,邓意平,等. 全胸腔镜下腔镜接骨板内固定与剖胸接骨板内固定治疗多发肋骨骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华创伤杂志,2025,41(03):289-296.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20241019-00611

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
多发肋骨骨折通常由交通事故、高处坠落、跌倒、暴力击打等高能量损伤因素所致,其发病率呈逐年上升趋势,常伴有创伤性气胸、血胸、血气胸、肺挫裂伤等,不仅会引起胸壁剧烈疼痛、呼吸困难等症状,还可能因胸廓稳定性破坏导致连枷胸,出现反常呼吸,进而引发呼吸、循环功能障碍,显著增加患者的致残率和病死率,严重威胁患者生命健康,给患者家庭及社会带来沉重负担 1 , 2。目前,对于多发肋骨骨折的治疗主要包括非手术治疗和手术治疗。非手术治疗以吸氧、止痛、固定胸廓、防治肺部并发症等对症支持治疗为主,但长期卧床制动易引发肺部感染、肺不张、下肢深静脉血栓等并发症,且骨折愈合不良可导致胸廓畸形愈合,影响患者呼吸功能及生活质量 3 , 4。手术治疗旨在恢复胸廓完整性和稳定性,减少并发症,促进康复 5 , 6。传统剖胸手术能在直视下复位和固定骨折断端,但其在原有创伤基础上造成二次损伤,手术创伤大,术中出血多,术后切口疼痛剧烈,恢复慢,住院时长延长,且手术切口长、美观度差,对患者心理也会产生负面影响,使部分患者对手术治疗存在顾虑,依从性不佳 7 , 8 , 9。近年来,随着胸腔镜技术及手术材料学的快速发展,全胸腔镜下腔镜接骨板内固定术逐渐应用于治疗多发肋骨骨折,该术式具有创伤小、疼痛轻、恢复快、住院时间短等优势,且能够在一定程度上减少肺部并发症的发生,同时其切口小、美观度好,患者接受度相对较高 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14。但尚未见全胸腔镜下腔镜接骨板内固定治疗多发肋骨骨折临床效果的全面报道。为此,笔者采用回顾性队列研究分析2021年5月至2023年5月重庆医科大学附属璧山医院收治的65例多发肋骨骨折患者的临床资料,比较全胸腔镜下腔镜接骨板内固定与传统剖胸内固定的疗效,为该骨折治疗方法的选择提供参考。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
余小平,陈检明,钟京,. 早期与晚期切开复位内固定治疗严重肋骨骨折合并呼吸衰竭的疗效比较[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2022,38(11):1006-1011. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20220427-00313 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Oppizzi G , Xu D , Patel T ,et al. Open reduction internal fixation of rib fractures: a biomechanical comparison between the RibLoc U Plus ® system and anterior plate in rib implants [J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2023,49(1):383-391. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02075-x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Hisamune R , Kobayashi M , Nakasato K ,et al. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing nonoperative and operative management of chest trauma with multiple rib fractures[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2024,19(1):11. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00540-z .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Craxford S , Owyang D , Marson B ,et al. Surgical management of rib fractures after blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2022,104(4):249-256. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0148 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
乔贵宾,陈刚. 创伤性肋骨骨折的处理:广东胸外科行业共识(2017年版)[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2018,25(5):362-367. DOI: 10.7507/1007-4848.201710008 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
浙江省医学会创伤医学分会胸部创伤学组,肋骨胸骨创伤诊治:浙江省胸外科专家共识(2021版)编审委员会. 肋骨胸骨创伤诊治:浙江省胸外科专家共识(2021版)[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志:电子版, 2021,14(2):89-99. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2021.02.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Wasfie T , Sowa M , White H ,et al. Rib plating outcomes in elderly trauma patients with multiple rib fractures: A community hospital experience[J]. Am Surg, 2023,89(8):3519-3521. DOI: 10.1177/00031348231161713 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Sawyer E , Wullschleger M , Muller N ,et al. Surgical rib fixation of multiple rib fractures and flail chest: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Surg Res, 2022,276:221-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.055 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
葛健君,周顺楷,叶锋,. 完全胸腔镜下与剖胸肋骨内固定治疗连枷胸的疗效比较[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2022,38(11):999-1005. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20220427-00314 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Wang Z , Jia Y , Li M . The effectiveness of early surgical stabilization for multiple rib fractures: a multicenter randomized controlled trial[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2023,18(1):118. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-023-02203-7 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Castater C , Hazen B , Davis C ,et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic internal rib fixation[J]. Am Surg, 2022,88(5):994-996. DOI: 10.1177/00031348211060450 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Beks RB , Peek J , de Jong MB ,et al. Fixation of flail chest or multiple rib fractures: current evidence and how to proceed. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2019,45(4):631-644. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-1020-x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
余小平,易云峰,陈松林,. 多发肋骨骨折微创治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2020,36(10):950-955. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20200407-00285 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Wang D , Xu Y , Wang Q ,et al. A cohort study on the comparison of complications, short-term efficacy, and quality of life between thoracoscopic surgery and traditional surgery in the treatment of rib fractures[J]. Contrast Media Mol Imaging, 2022,2022:2079098. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2079098 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
孙兵,车晓明. 视觉模拟评分法(VAS)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2012,28(6):645.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
赵昊昱,孔令驰,杨凯,. 临床骨愈合评估方法研究进展[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021,23(11):1003-1007. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20210221-00088 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
张皓,封婷,裴志杰,. 不同时机切开复位内固定治疗多发肋骨骨折疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2022,38(2):155-165. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20210808-00427 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Elkbuli A , Baroutjian A , Hai S . In response to: A multicenter, prospective, controlled cli nical trial of surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with severe, nonflall fracture patterns (chest wall injury society nonflall) [J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2020,89(4):e122-e123. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002845 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
王通,宋金涛,闰天生,. 电视胸腔镜辅助肋骨接骨板治疗多发肋骨骨折合并血气胸[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016,16(3):245-248,278. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2016.03.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
杜峰,吴卫春,许坚. 经听诊三角行后肋肋骨骨折内固定术[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2018,18(12):1131-1132. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2018.12.021 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Wang D , Wang X , Wang Q ,et al. Comparative study of wound outcomes and surgical strategies: Internal fixation versus external stabilization in rib fracture patients with traumatic chest wounds[J]. Int Wound J, 2024,21(4):e14548. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14548 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Merchant NN , Onugha O . Novel extra-thoracic VATS minimally invasive technique for management of multiple rib fractures[J]. J Vis Surg, 2018,4:103. DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.05.08 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
周雪涛,张东升,张国亮,. 3D 打印技术在复杂肋骨骨折隧道式手术治疗中的应用[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2019,35(4):354-358. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2019.04.010 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Wang J , Sun Z , Liu Y ,et al. Clinical effect of the internal fixation for rib fracture with single utility port complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2024,19(1):59. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02517-0 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
Daskal Y , Paran M , Korin A ,et al. Multiple rib fractures:does flail chest matter?[J]. Emerg Med J, 2021,38(7):496-500. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210999 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[26]
Kakazu O , Ohta M , Touyama T . Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for chest trauma[J]. Kyobu Geka, 2024,77(4):268-271.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[27]
张书豪,沈庆伟,袁勇,. 开胸与胸腔镜下记忆合金环抱器内固定治疗肋骨骨折的疗效比较[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2024,26(7):523-527. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2024.07.009 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[28]
孙灿,刘炳春,翟春波,. 胸腔镜胸内固定术与传统开胸手术治疗多发肋骨骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2024,24(7):488-493. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2024.07.005 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[29]
Sweet AAR , Beks RB , Ijpma FFA ,et al. Epidemiology of combined clavicle and rib fractures: a systematic review[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2022,48(5):3513-3520. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01701-4 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[30]
余长永,宋月坤,朱康宇,. 肋骨骨折患者发生心肌挫伤预测模型的构建及其临床应用价值[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2024,40(8):715-726. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20240403-00262 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[31]
Zhang J , Hong Q , Mo X ,et al. Complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for rib fractures: Series of 35 cases[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2022,113(2):452-458. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.01.065 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[32]
Lin ZW , Long JT , Lin WK . Short-term follow-up of single-port thoracoscopic rib fracture reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of multiple rib fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2024,145(1):71. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05647-1 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[33]
周攀,吴中权,朱杰,. 胸腔镜微创手术治疗多发肋骨骨折并连枷胸的临床效果[J]. 中国骨伤, 2025,38(1):47-54. DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230319 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[34]
Shi J , Liu J . Retrospective cohort study of video-assisted thoracoscopic precise positioning reduction and internal fixation and thoracotomy reduction and internal fixation in treating multiple rib fractures[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2024,40(8):1632-1637. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9196 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
吕忠柱,Email: mocdef.aabnisuhzgnohzvl
B

毕磊:研究实施、数据采集及统计学分析、论文撰写;晨正宇、邓意平:研究实施、论文修改;艾成、杨富瑜:研究实施;吕忠柱:研究设计及实施、论文审定、经费支持

C
毕磊, 晨正宇, 邓意平, 等. 全胸腔镜下腔镜接骨板内固定与剖胸接骨板内固定治疗多发肋骨骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2025, 41(3): 289-296. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20241019-00611.
D
所有作者声明不存在利益冲突
E
重庆市璧山区社会民生领域科技计划项目 (BSKJ20210035)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号