物理·生物·技术
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
两种固体模体水等效特性的比较研究
王建华
王洵
任江平
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2011.03.019
Dosimetric characteristics of water equivalent for two solid water phantoms
WANG Jian-hua
Authors Info & Affiliations
WANG Jian-hua
Department of Radiation Oncology,Ningbo Treatment Center Lihuili Hosiptal,Ningbo 315041,China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2011.03.019
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的 对两种固体模体的水等效性及相关校准因子进行检测.方法 对美国MED-TEC公司虚拟水和德国PTW公司RW3两种同体模体不同深度处进行X线、电子线照射测量,得到深度电离量曲线与水模体中的进行比较,而水等效因子两种模体直接比较.按照国际原子能机构定义得到不同能量电子线深度比例因子(Cpl)与注量比例因子(hpl),比较两种模体间差异.结果 两种固体模体与水模体的深度电离量平均偏差在6 MV X线时为0.42%和0.16%(t:-6.15.P=0.001和t=-1.65,P=0.419),10 MV X线时为0.21%和0.31%(t=1.73,P=0.135和t:2.30.P=0.061),6 MeV电子线时为17.4%和14.5%(t=-1.37,P=0.208和t=-1.47,P=0.179),15 MeV 电子线时为7.0%和6.0%(t=-0.58,P=0.581和t=-0.90,P=0.395).两模体水等效因子变化均较大,但在参考测量点附近接近1,在6 MV X线时F=58.54、P=0.000,10 MV X线时F=0.21、P=0.662,6 MeV电子线时F=0.97、P=0.353,15 MeV电子线时F=0.14、P=0.717.随着电子线能量增加Cpl值增加(F=26.40,P=0.014)而hpl值减少(F=7.45,P=0.072).结论 若假设固体体模为完全水等效则会引入系统误差,因而在临床应用中要慎重。

固体水模体;水等效
ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the water equivalent of two solid water phantoms.Methods The X-ray and electron beam depth-ion curves were measured in water and two solid water phantoms,RW3 and Virtual Water.The water-equivalency correction factors for the two solid water phantoms were compared.We measured and calculated the range sealing factors and the fluence correction factors for the two solid water phantoms in the case of electron beams. Results The average differenee between the measurled ionization in solid water phantoms and water was 0.42%and 0.16%on 6 MV X-ray(t=-6.15.P=0.001and t=-1.65,P=0.419)and 0.21%and 0.31%on 10 MV X-ray(t=1.728,P=0.135 and t=-2.296,P=0.061),with 17.4%and 14.5%on 6 MeV electron beams(t=-1.37.P=0.208 and t=-1.47,P=0.179)and 7.0%and 6.0%on 15 MeV electron beams(t=-0.58.P=0.581 and t=-0.90,P=0.395).The water-equivalency correction factors for the two solid water Dhantoms varied slightly largely,F=58.54,P=0.000 on 6 MV X-ray,F=0.211.P=0.662 on 10 MV X.ray,F=0.97.P=0.353 on 6 MeV electron beams,F=0.14,P=0.717 on 15 MeV electron beams.However,they were almost equal to 1 near the referenee depths.The two solid water phantoms showed a similar tread of Cpl increasing(F=26.40,P=0.014)and hpl decreasing(F=7.45,P=0.072)with increasing energy.Conclusion The solid water phantom should undergo a quality control test before being clinical use.

SoIid Water phantom;Water equivalent
引用本文

王建华,王洵,任江平. 两种固体模体水等效特性的比较研究 : [J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2011,20(03):236-239.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2011.03.019

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
下载PDF至本地阅读
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号