临床论著
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
孤立性肺结节的临床评估
方振剑
佘晖
董芳
黄明朝
柳德灵
赖国祥
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2013.07.006
Clinical evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2013.07.006
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的 通过单因素与多因素Logistic回归分析筛选出与孤立性肺结节(SPN)恶性概率相关因素,建立恶性概率临床估算模型,并评价其在SPN良恶性鉴别中的作用.方法 回顾性分析182例SPN患者(A组)的临床资料,记录其性别、年龄、吸烟史、戒烟史、恶性肿瘤病史、癌胚抗原(CEA)、结节部位、最大直径、密度、空泡征、空洞征、空气支气管征、非良性钙化、分叶征、棘突征、毛刺、胸膜凹陷征、血管集束征、增强峰值、计算机断层扫描(PET)最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、病理共21项临床资料,通过单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析筛选出恶性SPN的独立危险因素,建立恶性概率临床估算模型.另选取确诊的SPN患者45例作为B组,验证该模型的预测价值.结果 单因素分析结果显示性别、年龄、非下叶分布、最大直径、实性、部分实性、空气支气管征、非良性钙化、分叶征、毛刺征、胸膜凹陷征、CT增强值≥15 HU、PET检查SUVmax≥2.5在SPN良恶性中的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析结果进一步提示:女性、年龄、分叶征、短毛刺及胸膜凹陷征是恶性SPN的独立危险因素,而实性则提示良性可能.建立恶性概率临床估算模型:P=ex/(1+ex),x=-3.399+ 1.382×性别+0.056×年龄+1.377×分叶征+1.498×短毛刺-2.096×实性+1.005×胸膜凹陷征,其中e为自然对数.选取P=0.663为截点,利用B组数据验证该评估模型,其灵敏度为86.5%,特异度为62.5%,阳性预测值为91.4%,阴性预测值为50.0%,准确度为82.2%.结论 对于SPN,女性、年龄、分叶征、短毛刺及胸膜凹陷征是恶性的独立危险因素,而实性则是独立保护因素,通过Logistic回归建立的恶性概率临床估算模型准确度较高,有较好的临床应用价值。

孤立性肺结节;诊断,鉴别;肿瘤;Logistic模型;恶性概率
ABSTRACT

Objective To screen the clinical factors affecting the malignant probability of solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) with univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis,and to establish a clinical prediction model,evaluate its test effectiveness in the differential diagnosis in SPN.Methods A retrospective cohort study included 182 patients with diagnosis of SPN (group A).Clinical data included gender,age,smoking history,quitting smoking,history of tumor,serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA),location,diameter,density,vacuole sign,cavity,airbronchogram,calcifcation,lobulation,spiculate sign,spiculation,pleural indentation sign,vascular convergence sign,enhanced CT value,the maximum standard uptake value (SUV~x) of positron-emission tomography (PET),pathological diagnosis were collected.The independent predictors of malignancy were estimated with univariate and multivariate analysis,then the clinical prediction model to identify malignant was established.Other 45 SPN patients (group B) were used to tested value of the model.Results Univariate analysis showed that gender,age,no lower lobe location,diameter,density,airbronchogram,calcification,lobulation,spiculation,pleural indentation sign,enhanced CT value ≥ 15 HU,SUVm,≥ 2.5 of PET significantly affected judgment of SPN of benign or maligant (P < 0.05).Multivariate analysis revealed that female,age,lobulation,short spiculation,pleural indentation sign was the independent predictors of malignancy in patient with SPN,solid nodule suggested benign.The clinical prediction model to identify malignant was established:P =ex/ (1 + ex),x =-3.399 +1.382 × gender + 0.056 × age + 1.377 × lobulation + 1.498 × spiculation-2.096 × solid + 1.005 × pleural indentation sign,e was natural logarithm.P =0.663 was as cut-off point,group B was used to test value of the model:the sensitivity was 86.5%,the specificity was 62.5%,the positive predictive value was 91.4%,the negative predictive value was 50.0%,the accuracy was 82.2%.Conclusions As for SPN,female,age,lobulation,short spiculation and pleural indentation sign is the independent predictor of malignancy in patient with SPN,solid nodule suggests benign.The prediction model is sufficient to estimate the malignancy of patient with SPN.

Solitary pulmonary nodule;Diagnosis,differential;Neoplasms;Logistic models;Proability of malignancy
引用本文

方振剑,佘晖,董芳,等. 孤立性肺结节的临床评估 : [J]. 中国医师进修杂志,2013,36(07):17-21.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2013.07.006

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
下载PDF至本地阅读
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号