上颈椎疾患
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
Jefferson骨折复位钢板的设计、改良及初步临床应用
夏虹
尹庆水
林宏衡
马向阳
许俊杰
吴增晖
艾福志
王建华
王智运
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2015.05.010
Design, modification and clinical application of Jefferson-fracture reduction plate
Xia Hong
Yin Qingshui
Lin Hongheng
Ma Xiangyang
Xu Junjie
Wu Zenghui
Ai Fuzhi
Wang Jianhua
Wang Zhiyun
Authors Info & Affiliations
Xia Hong
Department of Orthopaedics, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command(Liuhuaqiao Hospital), Guangzhou 510010, China
Yin Qingshui
Lin Hongheng
Ma Xiangyang
Xu Junjie
Wu Zenghui
Ai Fuzhi
Wang Jianhua
Wang Zhiyun
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2015.05.010
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的介绍Jefferson骨折复位钢板系统(Jefferson-fracture reduction plate,JeRP)及其相关参数,评估其改良前后的临床疗效。

方法对Jefferson骨折患者应用螺旋CT三维重建排除寰椎横韧带断裂后,采用原型JeRP系统进行手术治疗,分析其初步临床应用的疗效及出现的问题。根据应用中的不足,通过寰椎三维重建模型,进行应用解剖学研究并测量相关解剖数据,重新确定寰椎侧块上、下位螺钉的最佳进钉点和长度,根据该数据设计、改良JeRP钢板并予以临床应用。术后采用颈椎过伸、过屈位X线片评估是否存在寰枢椎不稳,应用CT扫描观察骨折愈合情况。

结果8例Jefferson骨折患者行经口咽寰椎骨折复位、原型JeRP钢板内固定术,术后平均随访6.3个月,所有患者术后枕颈部疼痛逐渐改善,咽后壁切口愈合良好,未见感染,骨折均达到解剖复位及骨性愈合,术后随访未见寰枢椎失稳,但其中3例患者因寰椎侧块上位螺钉穿破寰枕关节而导致颈椎活动受限。针对此问题,并通过应用解剖学测量,模拟置钉显示寰椎侧块外1/3平分线与寰椎上、下关节面交点所形成线段的中点作为寰椎侧块上位螺钉的进钉点,可保证JeRP钢板侧块上位螺钉不穿透上关节面,同时可保证足够空间置入下位螺钉,具备临床可行性。根据此结果设计出改良JeRP钢板,应用于4例Jefferson骨折患者,术后影像学检查证实所有螺钉均位于寰椎的侧块中。

结论原型JeRP初步应用显示较好的疗效,但仍存在寰椎侧块上位螺钉穿透寰枕关节的可能;改良后钢板的设计更加符合寰椎的解剖结构,基本可以保证螺钉位于侧块中。

颈寰椎;脊柱骨折;内固定器;骨折固定术,内
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo introduce the design, modification and clinical application of Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP), which was designed for the surgical treatment of Jefferson-fracture of the atlas, and evaluate the clinical effects.

MethodsJeRP system was designed for the treatment of patients with Jefferson fractures without rupture of the transverse ligament. Eight patients were treated operatively with the JeRP system for reduction and fixation of the fracture. Three-dimensional spiral CT was used to determine the integrity of the transverse ligament. During the preliminary clinical application, the clinical results were satisfied. But there were some disadvantages. The entry point of the superior screw of the mass was much too high, causing the screw penetrate into the atlantooccipital joint. Three-dimension Computed tomography images were used to analyze the anatomic characters of atlas. The relative anatomic parameter of the atlas was obtained. According to it, the Jefferson-fracture reduction plate was modified. The modified JeRP was applied clinically in another 4 patients. Extension and flexion X-ray were used to determine whether there was atlatoaxial dislocation after the operation. CT was used to determine whether there was bony fusion.

ResultsEight patients with Jefferson fractures without rupture of the transverse ligament were treated with the original JeRP. The mean follow-up time was 6.3 months. Neck pain was significantly alleviated after surgery in all patients. There was no infection or wound breakage. The reduction of the fracture was satisfied in all patients. Bony fusion was achieved in 3 months. No atlantoaxial dislocation was found in all patients during follow-up. Of the 8 patients, three complained about the movement restriction of the neck. The radiological examination found the upper screw of lateral mass breaking into the atlas-occipital joint. Anatomic structure of C 1 lateral mass was measured using 1 mm CT scans. The optimal entry points and other parameters for the screws of the mass were determined. According to the anatomic parameters, we modified the JeRP. Another 4 patients with Jefferson fractures without rupture of the transverse ligament were treated operatively using this modified JeRP system. The preliminary clinical results were satisfactory. No screw penetrating into the atlas-occipital joint happened.

ConclusionAlthough the preliminary results of the application of JeRP were satisfactory, there was a highratio of atlas-occipital joint violated during lateral mass screw insertion. The modified JeRP can avoid this complication.

Cervical atlas;Spinal fractures;Internal fixators;Fracture fixation, internal
引用本文

夏虹,尹庆水,林宏衡,等. Jefferson骨折复位钢板的设计、改良及初步临床应用[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2015,35(5):527-535.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2015.05.010

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
寰椎骨折,除后弓骨折外其余类型骨折均对上颈椎稳定性产生明显影响,称为不稳定型骨折 [ 1 ]。长期以来,对于不伴有神经损害的成人单纯寰椎骨折,由于位置特殊,手术风险较大,多采牵引、外固定支架等保守治疗 [ 2 , 3 ]。但对于骨折分离明显的患者,保守治疗由于骨折得不到很好的复位、同时外固定时间长、确切的固定难以保证,常导致骨折不愈合或枕颈关节对位不佳,造成患者的枕颈部疼痛、功能障碍 [ 4 ]。即使行手术治疗,既往临床上也多采用后路寰枢椎融合术或枕颈融合术治疗寰椎爆裂性骨折 [ 5 ],虽然稳定性得到很好地恢复,但枕颈部的运动功能基本丧失,影响患者的生活质量。
基于此,一种创伤较小、卧床时间短、可以使骨折复位、固定效果佳、同时保留寰枢椎功能的手术方式,将是针对寰椎爆裂性骨折的理想治疗方法。目前文献已有这方面研究的报道。Koller等 [ 6 ]通过生物力学试验证实寰椎单节段内固定对寰椎爆裂性骨折固定充分。Ruf等 [ 7 ]对6例合并横韧带损伤的不稳定型Jefferson骨折患者行经口咽单节段固定,并取得良好的效果。胡勇等 [ 8 ]也报告了利用重建钢板及Axis钢板治疗寰椎骨折的初步临床疗效分析,但该内固定器械并非寰椎骨折的专用器械,对不稳定型寰椎骨折可能无法将骨折断端复位。
基于上述情况,旨在实现寰椎骨折解剖复位的同时保留颈椎活动度,广州军区广州总医院研制了经口咽前路寰椎骨折复位内固定系统(transoralpharynxgeal atlas fracture reduction plate system, TAFRP) [ 9 ]。我们对寰椎进行了解剖学测量,理论上证实了寰椎具有足够的解剖安放空间。2006年,在TAFRP系统的基础上,我们对TAFRP系统进行进一步改进,研制了Jefferson骨折复位钢板(Jefferson-fracture reduction plate, JeRP)内固定系统 [ 10 ]。该系统目前在临床应用中逐步改进,已从原型JeRP系统发展到改良型JeRP系统,并进一步应用于临床。焦云龙和尹庆水 [ 10 ]通过6例新鲜上颈椎标本模拟寰椎前弓双骨折,以JeRP系统模拟行内固定并测量固定后上颈椎的活动度,证实了JeRP系统治疗不稳定型Jefferson骨折具有较好的生物力学性能。
本研究利用CT三维重建数据,测量正常国人寰椎的解剖参数,以及JeRP系统的相关技术参数;回顾性分析2008年4月至2013年12月期间应用原型及改良型JeRP系统治疗Jefferson骨折患者的病历资料,采用颈椎正、侧位,动力位及张口位X线片和CT评估术后是否存在寰枢椎不稳和植骨融合情况;总结治疗中遇到的问题和JeRP系统改良的情况。目的在于:(1)测量JeRP系统的相关技术参数;(2)评估JeRP系统治疗Jefferson骨折的临床疗效。
参考文献
[1]
夏虹,赵卫东,黄文华,. 寰椎不同类型骨折对上颈椎稳定性影响的生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2003,21(5):495-497.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Hadley MN , Dickman CA , Browner CM ,et al. Acute traumatic atlas fractures: management and long term outcome[J]. Neurosurgery, 1988,23(3):31-35.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Levine AM , Edwards CC . Treatment of injuries in the C1-C2 complex[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 1986,17(1):31-44.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Cattrysse E , Barbero M , Kool P ,et al. 3D morphometry of the transverse and alar ligaments in the occipitoatlanto-axial complex: an in vitro analysis[J]. Clin Anat, 2007,20(8):892-898.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Hein C , Richter HP , Rath SA . Atlantoaxial screw fixation for the treatment of isolated and combined unstable jefferson fracturesexperiences with 8 patients[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2002,144(11):1187-1192.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Koller H , Resch H , Tauber M ,et al. A biomechanical rationale for C1-ring osteosynthesis as treatment for displaced Jefferson burst fractures with incompetency of the transverse atlantal ligament[J]. Eur Spine J, 2010,19(8):1288-1298.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Ruf M , Melcher R , Harms J . Transoral reduction and osteosynthesis C1 as a function-preserving option in the treatment of unstable Jefferson fractures[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004,29(7):823-827.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
胡勇,马维虎,顾勇杰,. 经口咽入路内固定治疗孤立性寰椎骨折临床疗效分析[J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2011,9(3):131-134.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
廖穗祥,夏虹. 寰椎骨折前路复位内固定系统的研制及相应部位的解剖学测量[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2007,23(24):3815-3818.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
焦云龙,尹庆水. JeRP治疗不稳定型Jefferson骨折的应用解剖及生物力学评价[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2009,27(3):340-343.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Oda T , Panjabi MM , Crisco JJ 3rd,et al. Experimental study of atlas injuries. II. Relevance to clinical diagnosis and treatment[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1991,16(10 Suppl):S466-S473.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
<x>Sp</x> <x>ence</x> KF Jr, Decker S , Sell KW . Bursting atlantal fracture associated with rupture of the transverse ligament[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1970,52(3):543-549.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Kakarla UK , Chang SW , Theodore N ,et al. Atlas fractures[J]. Neurosurgery, 2010(66):3 Suppl-60. 67
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
林宏衡,夏虹. 寰椎骨折治疗进展[J]. 中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志, 2012,4(5):393-397.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Al-Holou WN , Park P , <x>Wan</x> <x>g</x> AC ,et al. Modified transoral approach with an inferiorly based flap[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2010,17(4):464-468.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
尹庆水,艾福志,章凯,. 经口咽前路寰枢椎复位钢板治疗难复性寰枢椎脱位疗效观察[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2008,28(3):177-181.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A

治疗性研究Ⅳ级

B
十二五军队重点项目 (BWS11C065)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号