临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
TransPRK与Epi-LASIK矫治薄角膜近视眼的临床疗效比较
侯杰
雷玉琳
郑秀云
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.06.011
Comparison of clinical effectiveness between transepithelial PRK and Epi-LASIK for myopia with thin cornea
Hou Jie
Lei Yulin
Zheng Xiuyun
Authors Info & Affiliations
Hou Jie
Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital, Jinan 250200, China
Lei Yulin
Zheng Xiuyun
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.06.011
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

背景单一步骤的经角膜上皮的准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术(TransPRK)是一种新型的表层切削术,术后角膜上皮愈合快,术眼刺激性小,但关于TransPRK术后临床效果的动态性观察、角膜生物力学性能以及角膜后表面形态等的变化研究鲜见报道。

目的评价TransPRK矫治薄角膜近视眼的手术效果及安全性,并与机械法准分子激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术(Epi-LASIK)进行比较。

方法采用前瞻性非随机对照研究设计,收集2013年6—12月在济南市明水眼科医院拟行表层准分子激光手术的近视及近视散光患者93例93眼,均纳入右眼进行分析。术眼术前角膜厚度为460~500 μm,其中TransPRK组46眼,Epi-LASIK组47眼,分别于术前及术后1周、1个月、3个月和6个月记录并比较2个组术眼的裸眼视力(UCVA)、屈光度、角膜上皮下雾状混浊(haze)程度、角膜生物力学参数、角膜后表面高度及Q值、角膜像差。

结果TransPRK组术后不同时间点视力和屈光度变化的眼数分布与Epi-LASIK组的差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。术后6个月,TransPRK组UCVA≥1.0者占93.9%,屈光度在±1.00 D以内者占90.9%,具有良好的安全性和稳定性。术后1个月haze最明显,TransPRK组有15眼出现haze,占32.6%,Epi-LASIK组有8眼出现haze,占17.4%,均在0.5级以下。TransPRK组haze的发生率略高于Epi-LASIK组,2个组间差异无统计学意义( χ 2=2.841, P=0.092)。2个组间角膜滞后量(CH)值和角膜阻力因子(CRF)值的总体差异均无统计学意义(CH: F 分组=0.000, P=0.999;CRF: F 分组=0.110, P=0.741),但2个组术眼术后CH值和CRF值均明显下降,不同时间点的总体比较差异均有统计学意义(CH: F 时间=103.658, P=0.000;CRF: F 时间=132.008, P=0.000),其中术后不同时间点CH值和CRF值均较术前明显降低,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.01),而术后各时间点间的相互比较差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。2个组间术后各时间点角膜后表面高度较术前均轻微后移,与术前值比较差异有统计学意义( F 时间=12.868, P=0.001),但组间比较差异无统计学意义( F 分组=1.923, P=0.169)。2个组手术前后不同时间点术眼角膜后表面Q值总体比较差异均无统计学意义( F 分组=0.191, P=0.663; F 时间=1.783, P=0.185)。2个组术眼术后各时间点角膜高阶像差均方根(RMS)值与球差值均较术前明显增加,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.01),但组间总体比较差异均无统计学意义(角膜RMS: F 分组=0.299, P=0.586;角膜球差: F 分组=1.290, P=0.259)。

结论TransPRK矫正薄角膜的近视眼术后视力和屈光稳定性较好,与Epi-LASIK比较无明显差异;术后早期角膜生物力学性能降低,但随着术后时间的延长逐步恢复;术后角膜后表面高度有轻微后移的现象,但并未影响后表面整体的非球面形态。

近视/手术疗法;准分子激光/治疗用途;屈光性角膜切削术;角膜生物力学;角膜地形图;术后并发症;前瞻性研究
ABSTRACT

BackgroundIntegrated transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) is a new kind of surface ablation and has a fast reepithelialization and uncorrective visual acuity (UCVA) recovery as well as slighter postoperative pain, and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK) has been recognized to be an effective method for myopia.But there have been few studies to evaluate the dynamic change of the corneal biomechanical properties and posterior corneal elevation after TransPRK.

ObjectiveThis study was to assess and compare the effectiveness and safety between TransPRK and Epi-LASIK for myopia with thin cornea.

MethodsThis study was approved by Ethic Committee of Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient.In this prospective non-randomized controlled study, 93 right eyes of 93 myopic patients with the central corneal thickness 460 to 500 μm were included in Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital from June to December 2013 under the informed consent.The eyes were divided into TransPRK group for 46 eyes and Epi-LASIK group for 47 eyes.UCVA, manifest refraction, haze, corneal biomechanical properties, posterior corneal elevation, Q-value and corneal high order wavefront aberration were analyzed before and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation, respectively, and the examination results were compared between the two groups.

ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the eyes of postoperative UCVA and manifest refraction between the TransPRK group and the Epi-LASIK group at various time points (all at P>0.05). Six months after surgery, the percentage of eyes with UCVA of 1.0 or better was 93.9%, and 90.9% eyes exhibited the targeted refraction in ±1.00 D in the TransPRK group.Corneal haze was most obvious 1 month after surgery in both groups, with the incidence of 32.6% (15/46) in the TransPRK group and 17.4% (8/47) in the Epi-LASIK group, but no significant difference was found in the eye numbers with haze between the two groups ( χ 2=2.841, P=0.092). No significant differences were seen in the corneal hysteresis(CH) values and corneal resistance factor(CRF) values between the two groups(CH: F group=0.000, P=0.999; CRF: F group=0.110, P=0.741), however, the postoperative CH values and CRF values were significantly declined in comparison with preoperative ones, with significant differences among various time points (CH: F time=103.658, P=0.000; CRF: F time=132.008, P=0.000), while there were no remarkable differences between any two time points in postoperation (all at P>0.05). Posterior corneal surface height shifted rearward 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery, showing remarkable differences in comparison with before surgery in both groups ( F time=12.868, P=0.001), but no significant differences between the two groups ( F group=1.923, P=0.169). No significant differences were found in Q-value between the two groups ( F group=0.191, P=0.663). Root mean square (RMS) and spherical aberration values elevated in postoperation compared with preoperation, with significant differences between them(all at P<0.01), but the comparison between intergroup was insignificant (RMS: F group=0.299, P=0.586; Spherical aberration: F group=1.290, P=0.259).

ConclusionsTransPRK for myopia with thin cornea is safe and stably effective like Epi-LASIK.TransPRK affects corneal biomechanical properties early after surgery but the effect gradually lessens over time.The posterior corneal elevation shows a tiny backward displacement, while posterior corneal asphericity has no change.

Myopia/surgery;Lasers, excimer/therapeutic use;Photorefractive keratectomy;Biomechanical phenomena, corneal;Postoperative complications;Corneal topography;Prospective study
Lei Yulin, Email: mocdef.6ab21246niluyiel
引用本文

侯杰,雷玉琳,郑秀云. TransPRK与Epi-LASIK矫治薄角膜近视眼的临床疗效比较[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2015,33(6):531-536.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.06.011

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
准分子激光角膜屈光手术在改变角膜前表面形态的同时也引起角膜的变薄,影响角膜正常的生物力学性能。与角膜板层激光屈光手术相比,表层激光手术无需制作角膜瓣,对于角膜偏薄的近视患者来说,可更好地保留术后角膜的生物力学性能 [ 1 ]。经角膜上皮的准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术(transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy,TransPRK)是非接触的、连续的角膜上皮去除联合PRK,目前已有全激光TransPRK的临床疗效及早期角膜组织的恢复情况的报道 [ 2 , 3 ],而关于TransPRK术后角膜生物力学变化、角膜后表面形态以及高阶像差改变等的研究鲜见报道。本研究中将TransPRK与机械法准分子激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术(epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis,Epi-LASIK)对角膜较薄的近视眼的临床疗效进行比较。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Dawson DG , Grossniklaus HE , McCarey BE . Biomechanical and wound healing characteristics of corneas after excimerlaser keratorefractive surgery:is there a difference between advanced surface ablation and sub-Bowman's keratomileusis?[J]. J Refract Surg, 2008,24(1):S90-96.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Fadlallah A , Fahed D , Khalil K . Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy:clinical results[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2011,37(10):1852-1857. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.029 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Luger MH , Ewering T , Arba-Mosquera S ,et al. Consecutive myopia correction with transepithelial versus alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy in contralateral eyes:one-year results[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2012,38(8):1414-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.028 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Fantes FE , Hanna KD , Waring GO Ⅲ ,et al. Wound healing after excimer laser keratomileusis (photorefractive keratectomy) in monkeys[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1990,108(5):665-675.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Camellin M , Wvler D . Epi-LASIK versus epi-LASEK[J]. J Refract Surg, 2008,24(1):S57-63.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Katsanevaki VJ , Kalyvianak MI , Kavroulaki DS ,et al. One-year clinical results after Epi-LASIK for myopia[J]. Ophthalmology, 2007,114(6):1111-1117.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
de Ortueta D , Arba Mosquera S , Baatz H . Aberration-neutral ablation pattern in hyperopic LASIK with the ESIRIS laser platform[J]. J Refract Surg, 2009,25(2):175-184.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
周雯陈湘Stojanovic A经上皮个性化表面切削术与器械法去上皮准分子激光角膜表面切削术在患者术后早期恢复情况的比较[J]中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 201113(4):290-294. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2011.04.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Roberts C . The cornea is not a piece of plastic[J]. J Refract Surg, 2000,16(4):407-413.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Qazi MA , Sanderson JP , Mahmoud AM ,et al. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009,35(10):1774-1788. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.041 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Kamiya K , Shimizu K , Ohmoto F . Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer[J]. J Refract Surg, 2009,25(10):888-893. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090917-10 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Shah S , Laiquzzaman M , Bhojwani R ,et al. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2007,48(7):3026-3031.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Zhang L , Wang Y . The shape of posterior corneal surface in normal, post-LASIK, and post-epi-LASIK eyes[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010,51(7):3468-3475. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4811 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Sun HJ , Park JW , Kim SW . Stability of the posterior corneal surface after laser surface ablation for myopial[J]. Cornea, 2009,28(9):1019-1022. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181a06f1ê .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Grzybowski DM , Roberts CJ , Mahmoud AM ,et al. Model for nonectatic increase in posterior corneal elevation after ablative procedures[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005,31(1):72-81.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
薛超王雁左彤飞秒激光与常规刀片准分子激光术后角膜后表面高度早期变化的对照研究[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201432(3):235-240. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2014.03.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
雷玉琳,Email: mocdef.6ab21246niluyiel
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号