背景单一步骤的经角膜上皮的准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术(TransPRK)是一种新型的表层切削术,术后角膜上皮愈合快,术眼刺激性小,但关于TransPRK术后临床效果的动态性观察、角膜生物力学性能以及角膜后表面形态等的变化研究鲜见报道。
目的评价TransPRK矫治薄角膜近视眼的手术效果及安全性,并与机械法准分子激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术(Epi-LASIK)进行比较。
方法采用前瞻性非随机对照研究设计,收集2013年6—12月在济南市明水眼科医院拟行表层准分子激光手术的近视及近视散光患者93例93眼,均纳入右眼进行分析。术眼术前角膜厚度为460~500 μm,其中TransPRK组46眼,Epi-LASIK组47眼,分别于术前及术后1周、1个月、3个月和6个月记录并比较2个组术眼的裸眼视力(UCVA)、屈光度、角膜上皮下雾状混浊(haze)程度、角膜生物力学参数、角膜后表面高度及Q值、角膜像差。
结果TransPRK组术后不同时间点视力和屈光度变化的眼数分布与Epi-LASIK组的差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。术后6个月,TransPRK组UCVA≥1.0者占93.9%,屈光度在±1.00 D以内者占90.9%,具有良好的安全性和稳定性。术后1个月haze最明显,TransPRK组有15眼出现haze,占32.6%,Epi-LASIK组有8眼出现haze,占17.4%,均在0.5级以下。TransPRK组haze的发生率略高于Epi-LASIK组,2个组间差异无统计学意义( χ 2=2.841, P=0.092)。2个组间角膜滞后量(CH)值和角膜阻力因子(CRF)值的总体差异均无统计学意义(CH: F 分组=0.000, P=0.999;CRF: F 分组=0.110, P=0.741),但2个组术眼术后CH值和CRF值均明显下降,不同时间点的总体比较差异均有统计学意义(CH: F 时间=103.658, P=0.000;CRF: F 时间=132.008, P=0.000),其中术后不同时间点CH值和CRF值均较术前明显降低,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.01),而术后各时间点间的相互比较差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。2个组间术后各时间点角膜后表面高度较术前均轻微后移,与术前值比较差异有统计学意义( F 时间=12.868, P=0.001),但组间比较差异无统计学意义( F 分组=1.923, P=0.169)。2个组手术前后不同时间点术眼角膜后表面Q值总体比较差异均无统计学意义( F 分组=0.191, P=0.663; F 时间=1.783, P=0.185)。2个组术眼术后各时间点角膜高阶像差均方根(RMS)值与球差值均较术前明显增加,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.01),但组间总体比较差异均无统计学意义(角膜RMS: F 分组=0.299, P=0.586;角膜球差: F 分组=1.290, P=0.259)。
结论TransPRK矫正薄角膜的近视眼术后视力和屈光稳定性较好,与Epi-LASIK比较无明显差异;术后早期角膜生物力学性能降低,但随着术后时间的延长逐步恢复;术后角膜后表面高度有轻微后移的现象,但并未影响后表面整体的非球面形态。
BackgroundIntegrated transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) is a new kind of surface ablation and has a fast reepithelialization and uncorrective visual acuity (UCVA) recovery as well as slighter postoperative pain, and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK) has been recognized to be an effective method for myopia.But there have been few studies to evaluate the dynamic change of the corneal biomechanical properties and posterior corneal elevation after TransPRK.
ObjectiveThis study was to assess and compare the effectiveness and safety between TransPRK and Epi-LASIK for myopia with thin cornea.
MethodsThis study was approved by Ethic Committee of Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient.In this prospective non-randomized controlled study, 93 right eyes of 93 myopic patients with the central corneal thickness 460 to 500 μm were included in Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital from June to December 2013 under the informed consent.The eyes were divided into TransPRK group for 46 eyes and Epi-LASIK group for 47 eyes.UCVA, manifest refraction, haze, corneal biomechanical properties, posterior corneal elevation, Q-value and corneal high order wavefront aberration were analyzed before and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation, respectively, and the examination results were compared between the two groups.
ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the eyes of postoperative UCVA and manifest refraction between the TransPRK group and the Epi-LASIK group at various time points (all at P>0.05). Six months after surgery, the percentage of eyes with UCVA of 1.0 or better was 93.9%, and 90.9% eyes exhibited the targeted refraction in ±1.00 D in the TransPRK group.Corneal haze was most obvious 1 month after surgery in both groups, with the incidence of 32.6% (15/46) in the TransPRK group and 17.4% (8/47) in the Epi-LASIK group, but no significant difference was found in the eye numbers with haze between the two groups ( χ 2=2.841, P=0.092). No significant differences were seen in the corneal hysteresis(CH) values and corneal resistance factor(CRF) values between the two groups(CH: F group=0.000, P=0.999; CRF: F group=0.110, P=0.741), however, the postoperative CH values and CRF values were significantly declined in comparison with preoperative ones, with significant differences among various time points (CH: F time=103.658, P=0.000; CRF: F time=132.008, P=0.000), while there were no remarkable differences between any two time points in postoperation (all at P>0.05). Posterior corneal surface height shifted rearward 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery, showing remarkable differences in comparison with before surgery in both groups ( F time=12.868, P=0.001), but no significant differences between the two groups ( F group=1.923, P=0.169). No significant differences were found in Q-value between the two groups ( F group=0.191, P=0.663). Root mean square (RMS) and spherical aberration values elevated in postoperation compared with preoperation, with significant differences between them(all at P<0.01), but the comparison between intergroup was insignificant (RMS: F group=0.299, P=0.586; Spherical aberration: F group=1.290, P=0.259).
ConclusionsTransPRK for myopia with thin cornea is safe and stably effective like Epi-LASIK.TransPRK affects corneal biomechanical properties early after surgery but the effect gradually lessens over time.The posterior corneal elevation shows a tiny backward displacement, while posterior corneal asphericity has no change.
侯杰,雷玉琳,郑秀云. TransPRK与Epi-LASIK矫治薄角膜近视眼的临床疗效比较[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2015,33(6):531-536.
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.06.011版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
除非特别声明,本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编委会的观点。

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。