临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
不同准分子激光角膜屈光手术对近视眼角膜滞后量和角膜阻力因子的影响
吴东芳
邓应平
王顺清
邱乐梅
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.06.013
Influence of different types of corneal laser refractive surgeries on corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in myopic eyes
Wu Dongfang
Deng Yingping
Wang Shunqing
Qiu Lemei
Authors Info & Affiliations
Wu Dongfang
Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
Deng Yingping
Wang Shunqing
Qiu Lemei
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.06.013
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

背景准分子激光角膜屈光手术因术后痛苦小、视力恢复快、有效性佳和预测性好,成为目前治疗屈光不正的主流方法,但术后角膜生物力学性能降低可导致继发圆锥角膜、角膜扩张等并发症,因此准分子激光角膜屈光术后角膜生物力学的研究是临床上受到关注的问题之一。

目的研究不同准分子激光角膜屈光手术对角膜生物力学的影响。

方法采用前瞻性非随机对照的研究方法,纳入拟行角膜屈光手术的中度近视患者82例164眼,按手术方式的不同将患者分为前弹力层下激光角膜磨镶术(SBK)组(30例60眼)、准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术(LASIK)组(27例54眼)和准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)组(25例50眼),3个组受检者基线特征均相匹配。利用眼反应分析仪(ORA)分别测定和比较不同手术方式组术眼术前及术后1周和5个月的角膜滞后量(CH)值和角膜阻力因子(CRF)值,并分析角膜切削厚度与CH、CRF手术前后差值的关系。

结果不同时间点SBK、LASIK、LASEK组间CH和CRF的总体比较差异均无统计学意义( F 分组=2.17, P=0.08; F 分组=2.67, P=0.07),各组不同时间点间CH值和CRF值的总体比较差异均有统计学意义( F 时间=41.90, P=0.00; F 时间=49.65, P=0.00),3个组术后1周、5个月,CH、CRF值均较术前明显下降,差异均有统计学意义(均 P=0.00)。对角膜切削厚度与CH、CRF的差值分析发现,术后1周至术后5个月,角膜切削厚度与CH差值均不相关(均 R 2=0.000),但与CRF差值呈弱相关(1周: Y=3.253+0.010 XR 2=0.007;5个月: Y=1.073+0.021 XR 2=0.004)。

结论SBK、LASIK、LASEK术后术眼的角膜CH和CRF值均下降,导致角膜的生物力学变化,3种手术方式对角膜生物力学的影响相似,CRF在评价角膜屈光手术后角膜生物力学变化方面比CH更有价值。

角膜/生理;近视/手术;弹性组织;生物力学;激光角膜原位磨镶术;激光上皮下角膜磨镶术;前弹力层下激光角膜磨镶术
ABSTRACT

BackgroundRefractive surgery has propelled itself forward to become widely performed surgical procedure nowadays.After the surgery, corneal biomechanics decreases lead to keratoconus and corneal ectasia.Doctors pay more attention to biomechanics changes after refractive surgeries.

ObjectiveThis clinical study was to investigate the influence of different laser refractive surgeries on corneal biomechanics.

MethodsA prospective nonrandomized and controlled clinical study was designed.One hundred and sixty-four eyes of 82 patients with moderate myopia were enrolled.The patients were divided into sub-Bowman keratomileusis(SBK) group (60 eyes of 30 patients), laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK) group (54 eyes of 27 patients) and laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) group(50 eyes of 25 patients), with the matched demography among the three groups.Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were detected by ocular response analyzer (ORA) before and 1 week, 5 months after refractive surgery.The correlations between stromal ablation depth and postoperative changing values of CH or CRF were analyzed.

ResultsSignificant differences were found in CH and CRF at different time points in the three groups ( F time=41.90, P=0.00; F time=49.65, P=0.00), and the CH and CRF values were significantly lower 1 week and 5 months after surgery than those before surgery (all at P=0.00). However, no significant difference of CH or CRF was seen at all time points among the three groups ( F group=2.17, P=0.08; F group=2.67, P=0.07). No correlation was found between corneal ablation depth and CH in 1 week and 5 months after surgery (both at R 2=0.000), however, weaker correlations were seen between corneal ablation depth and CRF 1 week and 5 months after surgery ( Y=3.253+ 0.010 X, R 2=0.007; Y=1.073+ 0.021 X, R 2= 0.004).

ConclusionsSBK, LASIK and LASEK lead to the change of corneal biomechanics by altering CH and CRF, they play the same influence on cornea.CRF appears to be an useful indicator in evaluating corneal biomechanical changes after laser refractive surgery.

Cornea/physiology;Myopia/surgery;Elastic tissue;Biomechanics;Keratomileusis, laser in situ;Keratomileusis, laser subepithelial;Keratomileusis, sub-Bowman
Deng Yingping, Email: mocdef.3ab61855pyd
引用本文

吴东芳,邓应平,王顺清,等. 不同准分子激光角膜屈光手术对近视眼角膜滞后量和角膜阻力因子的影响[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2015,33(6):541-545.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.06.013

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
准分子激光角膜屈光手术因术后痛苦小、视力恢复快、有效性佳和预测性好,成为目前治疗屈光不正的主流方法,随着相关技术和手术器械的发展,准分子激光角膜屈光术后患者的满意度和安全性逐渐提高,但术中对角膜组织的切削不可避免地会改变角膜结构,影响角膜生物力学的稳定性,可导致继发圆锥角膜、角膜扩张等并发症发生 [ 1 , 2 ]。研究表明,准分子激光角膜屈光手术对角膜组织的切削量与角膜生物力学的稳定性下降明显相关,切削组织越多,角膜滞后量(corneal hysteresis,CH)和角膜阻力因子(corneal resistance factor,CRF)的变化量越大,且不同的术式对角膜生物力学变化的影响不同 [ 2 ]。用于测定角膜生物力学的方法包括离体角膜轴向拉伸试验、角膜膨胀法和离体全眼球角膜测定法,目前用于活体角膜生物力学性能的研究方法为眼反应分析仪(ocular response analyzer,ORA)测定法。本研究中采用ORA测定不同准分子激光角膜屈光手术前后CH和CRF的变化,比较准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术(laser in situ keratomileusis,LASIK)、准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(laser subepithelial keratomileusis,LASEK)、前弹力层下激光角膜磨镶术(sub-Bowman keratomileusis,SBK)3种手术方式对角膜生物力学的影响,并分析角膜切削厚度与CH、CRF改变值之间的关系。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Fontes BM , Ambrósio R Jr, Velarde GC ,et al. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes[J]. J Refract Surg, 2011,27(3):209-215. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100415-02 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
周行涛董子献进一步提高激光角膜屈光手术后患者满意度[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201331(6):521-523. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2013.06.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Ambrósio R Jr, Wilson SE . Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis:etiology, prevention, and treatment[J]. J Refract Surg, 2001,17(3):350-379.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Baek T , Lee K , Kagaya F ,et al. Factors affecting the forward shift of posterior corneal surface after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Ophthalmology, 2001,108(2):317-320.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Slade SG . Thin-flap laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2008,19(4):325-329. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328302cc77 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Elsheikh A , Wang D , Rama P ,et al. Experimental assessment of human corneal hysteresis[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2008,33(3):205-213. doi: 10.1080/02713680701882519 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Laiquzzaman M , Bhojwani R , Cunliffe I ,et al. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects:relevance in clinical context[J]. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 2006,34(2):114-118. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01185.x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Hjortdal JO , Jensen PK . In vitro measurement of corneal strain, thickness, and curvature using digital image processing[J]. Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 1995,73(1):5-11.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
刘睿褚仁远汪琳健康人角膜滞后量和阻力因子量测量值及相关因素分析研究[J]中华眼科杂志 200844(8):715-719.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Kirwan C , O'Keefe M . Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser:findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2008,86(2):215-218. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01023.x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Azar DT , Ghanem RC , de la Cruz J ,et al. Thin-flap (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) versus thick-flap laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia:case-control analysis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008,34(12):2073-2078. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
倪寿翔郁继国包芳军近视LASIK术后角膜生物力学参数变化的相关性[J]国际眼科杂志 201010(12):2305-2307.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Sullivan-Mee M , Billingsley SC , Patel AD ,et al. Ocular response analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2008,85(6):463-470. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181784673 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Martola EL , Baum JL . Central and peripheral corneal thickness.A clinical study[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1968,79(1):28-30.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Lu F , Xu S , Qu J ,et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2007,143(4):616-622.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Hayes S , Boote C , Lewis J ,et al. Comparative study of fibrillar collagen arrangement in the corneas of primates and other mammals[J]. Anat Rec (Hoboken), 2007,290(12):1542-1550. doi: 10.1002/ar.20613 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Ehongo A , De Maertelaer V , Pourjavan S . Effect of topical corneal anaesthesia on ocular response analyzer parameters:pilot study[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2009,29(5):325-328. doi: 10.1007/s10792-008-9239-x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
邓应平,Email: mocdef.3ab61855pyd
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号