实验研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
甲基纤维素滴眼液使用和存放过程中的微生物监测分析
宫瑞中
张红
王丽
王峻峰
王婧
张琳
冀明
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.09.010
Microbial monitoring analysis of methylcellulose eye drops during use and storage
Gong Ruizhong
Zhang Hong
Wang Li
Wang Junfeng
Wang Jing
Zhang Lin
Ji Ming
Authors Info & Affiliations
Gong Ruizhong
Department of Pharmacy, Shanxi Eye Hospital, Taiyuan 030002, China
Zhang Hong
Wang Li
Wang Junfeng
Wang Jing
Zhang Lin
Ji Ming
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.09.010
463
40
0
0
1
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

背景目前大多数滴眼剂为多剂量包装,为保证滴眼液在使用中的安全性,对滴眼液瓶开启后使用过程中的微生物相关研究很有必要。

目的研究甲基纤维素(MC)滴眼液开启后在社区常温、社区冷藏及病区常温3种环境下使用和存放时微生物污染情况及保持无菌的时间。

方法将MC滴眼液按照模拟试验的温度、湿度和污染指数等环境的不同分为社区常温组、社区冷藏组和病区常温组,每个环境组取含或不含防腐剂尼泊金乙酯的MC滴眼液各200支,其中分为启封药物和不启封药物。由专业人员开启滴眼液瓶并标注开启时间,模拟点眼操作每次1滴,每日3次,每次药液空气中暴露时间为5~10 s,用后分别在相应环境中存放。分别于药瓶开启后1、2、3、4、5、6、7、8、9和10 d的8:00取样,由同一检验员进行细菌培养和真菌培养,并通过全自动微生物分析系统进行菌种鉴定。

结果药瓶开启后社区常温组、社区冷藏组和病区常温组无防腐剂启封药细菌阳性率均在30%左右,而未启封药物未见微生物生长。药瓶开启后10 d,社区常温组、社区冷藏组和病区常温组无防腐剂的启封药细菌培养阳性率分别为30%、32%和36%,而含防腐剂药物的启封药细菌阳性率分别为15%、19%和23%,组内比较差异均有统计学意义( χ 2=6. 452、4. 448、4. 063,均 P<0. 05);根据Scheffè法计算社区常温组与社区冷藏组、病区常温组与社区冷藏组以及病区常温组与社区常温组间无防腐剂启封药细菌阳性率差值的95%可信区间( CI)分别为–0. 166~0. 126、–0. 110~0. 190和–0. 088~0. 208,而含防腐剂启封药物细菌阳性率差值的95% CI分别为–0. 159~0. 079、–0. 089~0. 169和–0. 043~0. 203,尚不能认为不同环境间差异有统计学意义。培养的微生物经鉴定分别为藤黄微球菌、鲁氏不动杆菌、枯草芽孢杆菌、抗辐射不动杆菌、香味菌和木糖葡萄球菌。

结论防腐剂尼泊金乙酯可以降低MC滴眼液使用过程中的微生物污染率;滴眼液的常见使用环境对MC滴眼液的微生物污染情况无明显影响。MC滴眼液污染的菌群均属于大气、土壤等环境菌种,并非眼部常见致病菌。

滴眼液;药物污染;药品保存;细菌/分离和纯化;甲基纤维素滴眼液;杀菌防腐剂;尼泊金乙酯
ABSTRACT

BackgroundIt is imperative for the microbial monitor after opening the bottle of eyedrops in order to ensure the safety during use of ophthalmic solutions with multi-dose packaging.

ObjectiveThis study was to research the microbiological properties and sterile duration of methylcellulose (MC) eye drops in three common environmental conditions, including room temperature condition of community, refrigeration condition of community and room temperature condition of hospital.

MethodsMC eye drops were assigned to the community room temperature group, community refrigeration group and hospital room temperature group, and 200 bottles of MC eye drops with or without ethylparaben were collected in each group, including sealed or unsealed drugs at average. The containers of all the eye drops were opened and the opening times were record. The drugs was admistered 1 drop for 3 times per day, with the opening period for 5-10 seconds. Then the drugs were preserved in different environments based on grouping. Microbial isolation and purification were performed by the same lab technician at 8: 00 from 1 through 10 days after opening of drugs with automatic microbial analyzer.

ResultsIn the unsealed MC eye drops without ethylparaben, the bacterial positive rates were about 30% in the community room temperature group, community refrigeration group and hospital room temperature group, but no microbial colony was seen in the sealed eye drops. Ten days after opening of containers, the bacterial cultured rates were 30%, 32% and 36% in the eye drops without ethylparaben in the community room temperature group, community refrigeration group and hospital room temperature group, and those in the eye drops with ethylparaben were 15%, 19% and 23%, respectively, showing significant differences between the eye drops with and without ethylparaben ( χ 2=6. 452, 4. 448, 4. 063, all at P<0. 05). The 95% confidence interval ( CI) of difference values of intergroup bacterial rates were -0. 166-0. 126, -0. 110-0. 190 and -0. 088-0. 208 between the community room temperature group and the community refrigeration group, between the hospital room temperature group and the community refrigeration group, between the hospital room temperature group and the community room temperature group respectively in the unsealed eye drops without ethylparaben, and those in the unsealed eye drops with ethylparaben were -0. 159-0. 079, -0. 089-0. 169 and -0. 043-0. 203 respectively, indicating insignificant differences among the groups. Cultured bacteria were identified as Micrococcus luteus, Acinetobacter lwoffii, Bacillus subtilis, Acinetobacter radioresistens, Myroides and Staptococcus xylosus.

ConclusionsEthylparaben can reduce the contamination rate of microorganisms after opening of MC eye drops. Three environmental conditions do not play an influence on microbial contamination of MC eye drops after opening. The bacteria of contaminated eye drops appear to be common microorganisms in atmosphere and soil, rather than eye common pathogens.

Ophthalmic solutions;Drug contamination;Preservatives, pharmaceutical;Bacteria/isolation & purification;Methylcellulose eye drops;Antibacterial preservative;Ethylparaben
Gong Ruizhong, Email: mocdef.3ab61kjyky
引用本文

宫瑞中,张红,王丽,等. 甲基纤维素滴眼液使用和存放过程中的微生物监测分析[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2015,33(9):816-819.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.09.010

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
眼科常用药物剂型为滴眼剂,其安全性一直受到关注 [ 1 ]。滴眼剂的有效期指药品未开启状态下的有效保存期限,而容器开启后药物的合理使用期限却鲜有研究。绝大多数药物的滴眼液为多剂量包装,容器开启后容易被空气中的微生物污染,成为眼部感染的潜在原因 [ 2 , 3 ]。为保证滴眼液在使用中的安全性,对滴眼液瓶开启后使用过程中的微生物相关研究很有必要。本研究中采用微生物直接接种培养法观察含或不含防腐剂尼泊金乙酯的甲基纤维素(methyl cellulose,MC)滴眼液在病区常温、社区常温和社区冷藏等3种环境中进行细菌和真菌检查并进行菌种鉴定。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
陈祖基滴眼液中防腐剂的利弊及其使用对策[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201331(11):1003-1005. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2013.11.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
吴伟何梅凤马淑媚滴眼液的潜在风险及合理使用探讨[J]中国实用医药杂志 20105(26):50-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7555.2010.26.029 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
孙旭光高时运王智群滴眼瓶颈口微生物污染可能性的临床观察[J]眼科 19998(4):238.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
梁丽娟姜起栋黄薇瑞格列奈微生物限度检查方法的建立[J]中国医院药学杂志 201232(16):1314-1318. doi: 10.13286/j.cnki.chinhosppharmacyj.2012.16.028 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Kodym A , Zawisza T , Taberska J ,et al. Physicochemical and microbiological properties of eye drops containing cefuroxime[J]. Acta Pol Pharm, 2006,63(4):293-299.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Chédru-Legros V , Fines-Guyon M , Chérel A ,et al. In vitro stability of fortified ophthalmic antibiotics stored at-20 degrees C for 6 months[J]. Cornea, 2010,29(7):807-811. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181c32573 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Rojanarata T , Tankul J , Woranaipinich C ,et al. Stability of fortified cefazolin ophthalmic solutions prepared in artificial tears containing surfactant-based versus oxidant-based preservatives[J]. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 2010,26(5):485-490. doi: 10.1089/jop.2010.0036 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
林文中何伟黎华抗青光眼滴眼液中防腐剂对眼部影响[J]中国实用眼科杂志 201331(6):664-667. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2013.06.004 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
陆文80例门诊干眼病病因调查分析[J]中国伤残医学 201321(10):417-418. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6567.2013.10.368 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
赵堪兴杨培增眼科学[M]8版.北京人民卫生出版社 201330.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
杨汝文医院门诊部空气微生物监测分析[J]检验医学与临床 20063(5):225-226.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Rahman MQ , Tejwani D , Wilson JA ,et al. Microbial contamination of preservative free eye drops in multiple application containers[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2006,90(2):139-141.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
宫瑞中,Email: mocdef.3ab61kjyky
B
山西省科技厅基金项目 (20120313024-8)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号