论著
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
腹腔注射烟草烟雾提取物制备小鼠慢性阻塞性肺疾病模型的评价
张倩
黄萍
李艳
姚秀娟
孙英
王炜
孙永昌
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2015.04.010
Evaluation of a mouse model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease induced by intraperitoneal injections of cigarette smoke extract
Zhang Qian
Huang Ping
Li Yan
Yao Xiujuan
Sun Ying
Wang Wei
Sun Yongchang
Authors Info & Affiliations
Zhang Qian
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
Huang Ping
Li Yan
Yao Xiujuan
Sun Ying
Wang Wei
Sun Yongchang
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2015.04.010
2235
116
9
0
1
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的对烟草烟雾提取物(CSE)腹腔注射诱导小鼠慢性阻塞性肺疾病(慢阻肺)模型进行评价并探讨可能的发病机制。

方法6~8周龄体重为21~23 g的SPF级近交系C57BL/6雄性小鼠36只,按照随机数字表法分为2组,每组18只,腹腔注射CSE建立小鼠慢阻肺模型,测定小鼠肺力学参数、肺泡灌洗液中细胞总数和细胞分类数目、观察肺组织病理学改变同时测量平均内衬间隔(MLI)及肺泡破坏指数(DI);检测基质金属蛋白酶12(MMP12)、中性粒细胞弹性蛋白酶(NE)和金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂1(TIMP1)及肺组织匀浆中促炎细胞因子[肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)–α、IL–1β及IL–6]、Th1型细胞因子IFN–γ、Th2型细胞因子IL–5、IL–13和中性粒细胞趋化因子的表达水平。

结果实验21、41和61 d,CSE组小鼠肺总量(TLC)分别为(0.73±0.02)、(0.83±0.04)和(0.97±0.02)ml,均显著高于对照组的(0.65±0.01)、(0.67±0.02)和(0.71±0.04)ml,差异有统计学意义( t值分别为4.109、3.666和5.994,均 P<0.01);41和61 d呼吸系统顺应性(compliance)分别为(0.041±0.002)和(0.039±0.001) ml/cmH 2O(1 cmH 2O=0.098 kPa),较对照组的(0.030±0.001)和(0.032±0.003)ml/cmH 2O均显著增加,差异有统计学意义( t值分别为4.788和2.508,均 P<0.05);41和61 d呼吸系统阻力分别为(0.959±0.016)和(0.976±0.020)cmH 2O·s·ml –1,均显著低于对照组的(1.043±0.022)和(1.085±0.043)cmH 2O·s·ml –1,差异有统计学意义( t值分别为2.928和2.321,均 P<0.05)。21、41和61 d肺泡灌洗液中细胞总数分别为(23.83±2.63)×10 4、(20.67±1.69)×10 4、(18.67±1.56)×10 4,明显高于对照组的(7.33±0.61)×10 4、(7.67±0.76)×10 4、(6.67±0.88)×10 4,差异有统计学意义( t值分别为6.119、7.027、6.685,均 P<0.01),其中以中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞为主。肺组织出现慢阻肺典型病理学改变,包括炎症细胞浸润,实验组3个时间点的MLI分别为(48.0±1.4)、(56.1±2.4)和(59.3±3.3)μm,显著高于对照组的(40.5±1.2)、(43.7±1.2)和(43.5±1.2)μm,差异有统计学意义( t值分别为4.015、4.695、4.612,均 P<0.01),DI分别为(15.2±1.3)%、(22.4±1.3)%、(23.8±1.0)%,高于对照组的(11.1±0.9)%、(10.8±1.0)%、(12.4±0.7)%,差异有统计学意义( t值分别为2.532、7.225、8.471,均 P<0.05)。MMP12和NE表达增加,TNF–α、IL–1β、IL–6、IFN–γ及KC较对照组小鼠均明显升高。

结论小鼠腹腔注射CSE可在较短时间内建立慢阻肺模型,肺部炎症和蛋白酶/抗蛋白酶失衡可能参与发病过程。

肺疾病,慢性阻塞性;肺气肿;模型,动物;烟草烟雾提取物
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo evaluate a mouse model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) induced by intraperitoneal injections of cigarette smoke extract (CSE), and to study the potential mechanisms.

MethodsMice were injected intraperitoneally with CSE at different time points to establish a mouse model of COPD. Mouse lung mechanics parameters were measured, and the total numbers and differentials of cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were counted. Pathological changes of lung tissue were observed and mean linear intercept (MLI) and alveolar destructive index (DI) were measured. The expressions of matrix metalloproteinases-12(MMP12), neutrophil elastase (NE), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1(TIMP1), pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), Th1 cytokines(IFN-γ), Th2 cytokines (IL-5, IL-13) and the neutrophil chemokine KC were determined in the lungs of all mice.

ResultsSignificant increase of total lung capacity(TLC) [(0.73±0.02), (0.83±0.04), (0.97±0.02)ml] was found in the CSE group as compared with the PBS control group [(0.65±0.01), (0.67±0.02), (0.71±0.04)ml, t=4.109, 3.666, 5.994, P<0.01] at day 21, 41, 61. Lung compliance was higher in the CSE group [(0.041±0.002) ml/cmH 2O (1 cmH 2O=0.098 kPa), (0.039±0.001) ml/cmH 2O] than the PBS control group [(0.030±0.001) ml/cmH 2O, (0.032±0.003) ml/cmH 2O, t=4.788, 2.508, P<0.05] at day 41, 61, but airway resistance in the lungs (R) was lower in the CSE group [(0.959±0.016) cmH 2O·s·ml -1, (0.976±0.020) cmH 2O·s·ml -1] than the PBS control group [(1.043±0.022) cmH 2O·s·ml -1, (1.085±0.043) cmH 2O·s·ml -1] ( t=2.928, 2.321, P<0.05). The total numbers of BALF cells in the CSE group [(23.83±2.63)×10 4, (20.67±1.69)×10 4, (18.67±1.56)×10 4] were increased compared with the PBS control group [(7.33±0.61)×10 4, (7.67±0.76)×10 4, (6.67±0.88)×10 4, t=6.119, 7.027, 6.685, P<0.01] at day 21, 41, 61, predominantly with neutrophils and macrophages. Typical COPD pathological changes of lung tissue were evident, including Inflammatory cell infiltration in the lung parenchyma and increased mean linear intercept (MLI) in the CSE group [(48.0±1.4), (56.1±2.4), (59.3±3.3)μm] as compared with the PBS control group [(40.5±1.2), (43.7±1.2), (43.5±1.2)μm, t=4.015, 4.695, 4.612, P<0.01] as well as increased alveolar destructive index (DI) in the CSE group [(15.2±1.3)%, (22.4±1.3)%, (23.8±1.0)%] as compared with the PBS control group [(11.1±0.9)%, (10.8±1.0)%, (12.4±0.7)%, t=2.532, 7.225, 8.471, P<0.05] at the 3 time points. The expressions of MMP12 and NE increased significantly in the CSE-treated mice. Pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, L-6), Th1 cytokine IFN-γ and KC all increased significantly in the CSE-treated mice as compared with the PBS-control mice.

ConclusionsA mouse model of COPD was successfully established by repeated intraperitoneal injections of CSE in a shorter period of time. Local inflammation and proteinase/anti-proteinase imbalance as a result of CSE-induced immunological responses may be the underlying mechanisms.

Obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic;Emphysema;Model, animal;Cigarette smoke extract
Sun Yongchang, Email: nc.defudabe.umccynus
Wang Wei, Email: nc.defudabe.umccnibor_yw
引用本文

张倩,黄萍,李艳,等. 腹腔注射烟草烟雾提取物制备小鼠慢性阻塞性肺疾病模型的评价[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2015,38(4):279-285.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2015.04.010

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(慢阻肺)是以持续性气流受限为特征的常见肺部疾病,气流受限呈进行性发展,伴有气道和肺对有害颗粒或气体所致慢性炎症反应的增加 [ 1 ],主要的病理学改变为肺气肿、慢性支气管炎、小气道重塑和肺动脉高压。慢阻肺为多因素诱发的临床综合征,发病机制复杂,其中吸烟是慢阻肺最为重要的发病因素之一,吸烟者中15%~20%的易感人群最终临床诊断为慢阻肺,表明慢阻肺与个体遗传因素可能存在一定的关系 [ 2 , 3 ]。鉴于慢阻肺的复杂性,建立与人类慢阻肺改变一致或相似的动物模型一直是国内外探索的热点 [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]。目前,制备慢阻肺模型常用的方法是烟草烟雾暴露,但这种方法造模时间长,需要特殊的烟雾暴露装置,而自制的暴露装置缺乏统一标准,烟雾暴露量常不一致。近来有文献报道通过腹腔注射烟草烟雾提取物(CSE)可在短时间内使小鼠产生肺气肿、支气管炎等慢阻肺样改变 [ 7 , 8 , 9 ],但其发生机制尚未明确;尤其是参与慢阻肺发病的炎症因子、蛋白酶/抗蛋白酶系统是否存在异常,尚缺乏比较全面的评价。另外,考虑到慢阻肺是一种慢性进行性疾病,在动物模型制备过程中,观察不同时间点气道炎症和肺气肿的动态变化,不但有助于认识疾病进展,而且有助于确立制备模型的最佳方法。因此,我们观察了不同时间点腹腔注射CSE对小鼠慢阻肺模型的影响,并对可能的机制进行初步研究。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2013年修订版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2013,36(4):255-264.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Croxton TL , Weinmann GG , Senior RM ,et al. Future research directions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2002,165(6):838-844.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Fletcher C , Peto R . The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction[J]. Br Med J, 1977,1(6077):1645-1648.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Sethi JM , Rochester CL . Smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Clin Chest Med, 2000,21(1):67-86.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Viegi G , Scognamiglio A , Baldacci S ,et al. Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)[J]. Respiration, 2001,68(1):4-19.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Barnes PJ , Shapiro SD , Pauwels RA . Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: molecular and cellular mechanisms[J]. Eur Respir J, 2003,22(4):672-688.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Zhang Y , Cao J , Chen Y ,et al. Intraperitoneal injection of cigarette smoke extract induced emphysema, and injury of cardiac and skeletal muscles in BALB/C mice[J]. Exp Lung Res, 2013,39(1):18-31.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Chen Y , Hanaoka M , Droma Y ,et al. Endothelin-1 receptor antagonists prevent the development of pulmonary emphysema in rats[J]. Eur Respir J, 2010,35(4):904-912.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Chen Y , Hanaoka M , Chen P ,et al. Protective effect of beraprost sodium, a stable prostacyclin analog, in the development of cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema[J]. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2009,296(4):L648-L656.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Wirtz HR , Schmidt M . Acute influence of cigarette smoke on secretion of pulmonary surfactant in rat alveolar type Ⅱ cells in culture[J]. Eur Respir J, 1996,9(1):24-32.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Braber S , Thio M , Blokhuis BR ,et al. An association between neutrophils and immunoglobulin free light chains in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2012,185(8):817-824.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
刘莉丽,孙永昌,陈颖,. 烟草烟雾提取物对CD4+T细胞向Th17细胞和调节性T细胞分化的影响[J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2014(7):519-525.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Jonasson S , Hedenstierna G , Hedenstrom H ,et al. Comparisons of effects of intravenous and inhaled methacholine on airway physiology in a murine asthma model[J]. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2009,165(2-3):229-236.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Braber S , Verheijden KA , Henricks PA ,et al. A comparison of fixation methods on lung morphology in a murine model of emphysema[J]. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2010,299(6):L843-L851.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Choe KH , Taraseviciene-Stewart L , Scerbavicius R ,et al. Methylprednisolone causes matrix metalloproteinase-dependent emphysema in adult rats[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003,167(11):1516-1521.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
龙颖姣,陈燕,陈平. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病动物模型构建及评价[J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2014,34(17):1327-1330.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Groneberg DA , Chung KF . Models of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Respir Res, 2004,5:18.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Leberl M , Kratzer A , Taraseviciene-Stewart L . Tobacco smoke induced COPD/emphysema in the animal model-are we all on the same page?[J]. Front Physiol, 2013,4:91.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Waterston RH , Lindblad-Toh K , Birney E ,et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome[J]. Nature, 2002,420(6915):520-562.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Churg A , Cosio M , Wright JL . Mechanisms of cigarette smoke-induced COPD: insights from animal models[J]. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2008,294(4):L612-L631.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Irvin CG , Bates JH . Measuring the lung function in the mouse: the challenge of size[J]. Respir Res, 2003,4:4.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Brusselle GG , Bracke KR , Maes T ,et al. Murine models of COPD[J]. Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 2006,19(3):155-165.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Vanoirbeek JA , Rinaldi M , De Vooght V ,et al. Noninvasive and invasive pulmonary function in mouse models of obstructive and restrictive respiratory diseases[J]. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 2010,42(1):96-104.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Chung KF , Adcock IM . Multifaceted mechanisms in COPD: inflammation, immunity, and tissue repair and destruction[J]. Eur Respir J, 2008,31(6):1334-1356.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
Taraseviciene-Stewart L , Scerbavicius R , Choe KH ,et al. An animal model of autoimmune emphysema[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2005,171(7):734-742.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[26]
Owen CA . Proteinases and oxidants as targets in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Proc Am Thorac Soc, 2005,2(4):373-385, 394-395.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[27]
Churg A , Zhou S , Wright JL . Series "matrix metalloproteinases in lung health and disease": Matrix metalloproteinases in COPD[J]. Eur Respir J, 2012,39(1):197-209.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[28]
Abboud RT , Vimalanathan S . Pathogenesis of COPD. Part I. The role of protease-antiprotease imbalance in emphysema[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2008,12(4):361-367.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[29]
Lim S , Roche N , Oliver BG ,et al. Balance of matrix metalloprotease-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease-1 from alveolar macrophages in cigarette smokers. Regulation by interleukin-10[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2000,162(4Pt 1):1355-1360.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[30]
Keatings VM , Collins PD , Scott DM ,et al. Differences in interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in induced sputum from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1996,153(2):530-534.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[31]
Morrison D , Strieter RM , Donnelly SC ,et al. Neutrophil chemokines in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and leukocyte-conditioned medium from nonsmokers and smokers[J]. Eur Respir J, 1998,12(5):1067-1072.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
孙永昌,Email: nc.defudabe.umccynus
B
王炜,Email: nc.defudabe.umccnibor_yw
C
国家自然科学基金 (81170039,81102250)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号