实验研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
激光周边虹膜成形术中光凝兔青光眼模型不同部位虹膜的效果比较
谢茂松
徐国兴
周碧婷
游俊妹
黄谊红
陈振明
王珏
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2017.04.006
Effect comparison of laser peripheral iridoplasty at different sites of iris in pigment rabbit glaucoma
Xie Maosong
Xu Guoxing
Zhou Biting
You Junmei
Huang Yihong
Chen Zhenming
Wang Jue
Authors Info & Affiliations
Xie Maosong
Eye Institute of Fujian Province, First Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China
Xu Guoxing
Eye Institute of Fujian Province, First Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China
Zhou Biting
Medical Technology and Engineering College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China
You Junmei
Medical Technology and Engineering College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China
Huang Yihong
Medical Technology and Engineering College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China
Chen Zhenming
Medical Technology and Engineering College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China
Wang Jue
Medical Technology and Engineering College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2017.04.006
1438
29
0
0
1
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

背景激光周边虹膜成形术(LPI)能使虹膜收缩变平,房角增宽,在临床上用于青光眼的治疗。但目前临床上对LPI的最佳作用部位尚无定论。

目的探讨选择不同部位虹膜行LPI对青光眼疗效的影响。

方法取健康成年雄性灰兔40只,用含质量分数0.3%卡波姆和质量分数0.025%地塞米松的复方卡波姆溶液0.1 ml行兔右眼前房注射建立青光眼动物模型,然后将模型眼按随机数字表法随机分为模型对照组、角巩膜缘对应部位组、距角巩膜缘1个光斑对应部位组和距角巩膜缘2个光斑对应部位组,每组各10只。按照分组描述部位应用532 nm激光对角巩膜缘对应部位组、距角巩膜缘1个光斑对应部位组和距角巩膜缘2个光斑对应部位组实验眼行LPI,光斑直径为500 μm,能量为300 mW,曝光时间为0.3 s,激光击射24个点,模型对照组未行LPI。用Schiötz眼压计记录术前及术后2、4、7、14、30 d各组兔的眼压并计算房水流畅系数(C值),用超声生物显微镜(UBM)测定上述时间点兔眼前房深度(ACD)、房角开放度数(AA)和距巩膜突500 μm半径内的房角开放距离(AOD500)。于术后30 d摘取兔眼球,采用苏木精-伊红染色法观察各组兔眼房角的形态学改变。

结果UBM检查显示,与模型对照组比较,LPI各组兔眼房角均明显增宽,以距角巩膜缘1个光斑对应部位组最为明显,距角巩膜缘2个光斑对应部位组效果最不明显。与模型对照组比较,角巩膜缘对应部位组、距角巩膜缘1个光斑对应部位组、距角巩膜缘2个光斑对应部位组兔眼眼压均明显下降,C值均明显增加,AA和AOD500均明显增加,总体比较差异均有统计学意义(眼压: F 分组=16.848, P<0.01;C值: F 分组=9.629, P<0.01;AA: F 分组=62.336, P<0.01;AOD500: F 分组=77.779, P<0.01)。与各自LPI组内术前值比较,兔眼术后2、4、7、14、30 d眼压均明显下降,C值、AA和AOD500值均明显增加,总体比较差异均有统计学意义(眼压: F 时间=3.041, P=0.011;C值: F 时间=4.311, P<0.01;AA: F 时间=14.627, P<0.01;AOD500: F 时间=20.378, P<0.01)。与模型对照组比较,角巩膜缘对应部位组、距角巩膜缘1个光斑对应部位组兔眼各时间点ACD值均明显增加,而距角巩膜缘2个光斑对应部位组与其相似,总体比较差异有统计学意义( F 分组=18.017, P<0.01),各组兔眼LPI前后不同时间点ACD的总体比较差异无统计学意义( F 时间=0.022, P=1.000)。苏木精-伊红染色可见各LPI组术后30 d兔眼房角处小梁网和房角粘连均被拉开,房角不同程度增宽。

结论LPI可使青光眼模型兔眼房角增宽,眼压下降。在距离角巩膜缘1个光斑处虹膜上行LPI效果最佳。

青光眼/手术;虹膜/手术;激光疗法;眼压;前房角;治疗效果;激光周边虹膜成形术;灰兔
ABSTRACT

BackgroundLaser peripheral iridoplasty (LPI) is widely used in the treatment of glaucoma by flattening the iris and widening angle of anterior chamber (AA). However, no evidence suggests the optimal site of LPI in iris.

ObjectiveThis study was to compare the therapeutic effects of LPI at different sites of iris for glaucoma.

MethodsGlaucoma models were established in the right eyes of 40 healthy adult male pigment rabbits by intrachamber injection of 0.1 ml compound carbomer solution with 0.3% carbomer and 0.025% dexamethasone.The models were randomly divided into model control group, corneoscleral limbus group, one spot from corneoscleral limbus group and two spots from corneoscleral limbus group.LPI was performed at corresponding site of iris by 532 nm argon laser with the spot diameter 500 μm, energy 300 mW, exposure time 0.3 seconds and laser number 24 spots, and the rabbits in the model control group did not receive LPI.Intraocular pressure (IOP), coefficient of outflow facility (C value) were measured and calculated with Schiötz tonometer before LPI and 2, 4, 7, 14 and 30 days after LPI, and anterior chamber depth (ACD), AA, anterior chamber angle opening distance within 500 μm radius from scleral spur (AOD500) were measured with ultrasound biomicroscope (UBM). The eyeballs were extracted 30 days after LPI, and the chamber angle were observed under the optical microscope after hematoxylin and eosin staining.The use and care of the animals complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health.

ResultsUBM showed that compared with the model control group, the anterior chamber angle was evidently widened in all the LPI groups, with the best effectiveness in the one spot from corneoscleral limbus group and the worst one in the two spots from corneoscleral limbus group.Compared with the model control group, the IOP was evidently reduced, and C values, AA and AOD500 were significantly increased in the corneoscleral limbus group, one spot from corneoscleral limbus group and two spots from corneoscleral limbus group after LPI, showing significant differences among the four groups (IOP: F group=16.848, P<0.01; C value: F group=9.629, P<0.01; AA: F group=62.336, P<0.01; AOD500: F group=77.779, P<0.01). IOP was reduced and C value, AA and AOD500 were increased in 2, 4, 7, 14 and 30 days after LPI as compared with before LPI, with significant differences over time (IOP: F time=3.041, P=0.011; C value: F time=4.311, P<0.01; AA: F time=14.627, P<0.01; AOD500: F time=20.378, P<0.01). Compared with the model control group, the ACD was significantly increased in the corneoscleral limbus group and one spot from corneoscleral limbus group, and that in the two spots from corneoscleral limbus group was significantly reduced, and the ACD was insignificantly increased over time after LPI ( F group=18.017, P<0.01; F time=0.022, P=1.000). Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed that the trabecular meshwork and adhesion of tissure were reopened and the anterior chamber angle was widened after LPI.

ConclusionsLPI can widen anterior chamber angle and lower the IOP.The best therapeutic outcome for glaucoma is displayed when LPI is performed at the iris site corresponding to one spot from the corneoscleral limbus.

Glaucoma/surgery;Iris/surgery;Laser therapy;Intraocular pressure;Anterior chamber angle;Treatment outcome;Laser peripheral iridoplasty;Rabbits, pigment
Xu Guoxing, Email: mocdef.3ab61xgxumjf
Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20133518120006); College Students Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Project of China (201510392027)
引用本文

谢茂松,徐国兴,周碧婷,等. 激光周边虹膜成形术中光凝兔青光眼模型不同部位虹膜的效果比较[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2017,35(4):307-313.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2017.04.006

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
青光眼是主要的致盲眼病之一,统计数据表明2010年全球有210万人因青光眼而致盲,420万人因青光眼而视力下降 [ 1 ]。闭角型青光眼在亚洲人群中发病比例较高,据统计中国窄房角的人群有2 820万,房角关闭人群有910万,其中170万人因青光眼而致双眼盲 [ 2 ]。激光周边虹膜成形术(laser peripheral iridoplasty,LPI)是一种简单而有效的治疗方法,使房角开放,减少青光眼急性发作的风险 [ 3 , 4 ]。近年来LPI在临床上青光眼治疗中的应用逐渐增多,疗效比较肯定。但是,LPI过程中激光光凝虹膜的部位对疗效有无影响,国内外研究甚少。本研究旨在探讨采用LPI光凝虹膜不同部位对兔青光眼模型房角的影响。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Bourne RR , Taylor HR , Flaxman SR et al. Number of people blind or visually impaired by glaucoma worldwide and in world regions 1900-2010:a Meta-analysis[J/OL]PLoS One 201611(10)∶e0162229[2016-05-27]http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0162229.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Ng WS Ang GS Azuara-Blanco A Laser peripheral iridoplasty for angle-closure[DB/OL]Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012,(2)∶CD006746[2016-08-21]http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006746.pub3/full. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006746.pub3 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Lai J , Choy BN , Shum JW . Management of primary angle-closure glaucoma[J]Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 20165(1)∶5962. DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000180 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Fu J , Qing GP , Wang NL et al. Efficacy of laser peripheral iridoplasty and iridotomy on medically refractory patients with acute primary angle closure:a three year outcome[J]Chin Med J (Engl) 2013126(1)∶4145.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
徐岩陈祖基宋洁贞复方卡波姆诱发的兔高眼压模型与其它兔高眼压模型的比较研究[J]中华眼科杂志 200238(3)∶172175.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Xu Y , Chen ZJ , Song JZ . A study of experimental carbomer glaucoma and other experimental glaucoma in rabbits[J]Chin J Ophthalmol 200238(3)∶172175.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
李凤鸣眼科全书[M]北京:人民卫生出版社 199617651774.
[7]
王宁利刘文活体超声显微镜眼科学[M]北京:科学出版社 20025051.
[8]
王玉慧刘志成张昆亚人眼与兔眼虹膜组织力学特性的相关性分析[J]医疗设备信息 200217(6)∶1921.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wang YH , Liu ZC , Zhang KY et al. A research on relativity of biomechanical properties of iris tissue between human and rabbits[J]Inf Med Equip 200217(6)∶1921.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Mochizuki H , Takenaka J , Sugimoto Y et al. Comparison of the prevalence of plateau iris configurations between angle-closure glaucoma and open-angle glaucoma using ultrasound biomicroscopy[J]J Glaucoma 201120(5)∶315318. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e3d2da .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Ramakrishnan R , Mitra A , Abdul KM et al. To study the efficacy of laser peripheral iridoplasty in the treatment of eyes with primary angle closure and plateau iris syndrome,unresponsive to laser peripheral iridotomy,using anterior-segment OCT as a tool[J]J Glaucoma 201625(5)∶440446. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000307 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Lee JR , Choi JY , Kim YD et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy with iridoplasty in primary angle closure suspect:anterior chamber analysis by pentacam[J]Korean J Ophthalmol 201125(4)∶252256. DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.4.252 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Sng CC , Aquino MC , Liao J et al. Anterior segment morphology after acute primary angle closure treatment:a randomised study comparing iridoplasty and medical therapy[J]Br J Ophthalmol 2016100(4)∶542548. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307087 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
杜宁静陈琦莫梓坚改良氩激光周边虹膜成形术后前房角的改变[J]眼科研究 200321(1)∶5658.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Du NJ , Chen Q , Mo ZJ et al. Change of anterior chamber angle after modified argon laser peripheral iridoplasty[J]Chin Ophthal Res 200321(1)∶5658.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Mochizuki H , Takenaka J , Sugimoto Y et al. Comparison of the prevalence of plateau iris configurations between angle-closure glaucoma and open-angle glaucoma using ultrasound biomicroscopy[J]J Glaucoma 201120(5)∶315318. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e3d2da .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
林仲张袆草激光周边虹膜切除术后前房及房角形态评价方法的研究进展[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201129(2)∶174178. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2011.02.019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Lin Z , Zhang YC . Evaluation methods of anterior chamber and angle structures after laser peripheral iridotomy[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201129(2)∶174178. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2011.02.019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Liu J , Lamba T , Belyea DA . Peripheral laser iridoplasty opens angle in plateau iris by thinning the cross-sectional tissues[J/OL]Clin Ophthalmol 2013718951897[2016-09-12]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792924/. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S47297 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Yoong LJC , O'Connor J , Soon AG et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography changes to the anterior chamber angle in the short-term following laser peripheral iridoplasty[J]J Curr Glaucoma Pract 20148(1)∶16. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1152 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Lee JR , Choi JY , Kim YD et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy with iridoplasty in primary angle closure suspect:anterior chamber analysis by pentacam[J]Korean J Ophthalmol 201125(4)∶252256. DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.4.252 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Wright C , Tawfik MA , Waisbourd M et al. Primary angle-closure glaucoma:an update[J]Acta Ophthalmol 201694(3)∶217225. DOI: 10.1111/aos.12784 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Lam DS , Tham CC , Lai JS et al. Current approaches to the management of acute primary angle closure[J]Curr Opin Ophthalmol 200718(2)∶146151. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32808374c9 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Narayanaswamy A , Baskaran M , Perera SA et al. Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty for primary angle-closure glaucoma:a randomized controlled trial[J]Ophthalmology 2016123(3)∶514521. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
徐国兴,Email: mocdef.3ab61xgxumjf
B
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目 (20133518120006)
国家级"大学生创新创业训练项目" (201510392027)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号